Study of NGX-1998 for the Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia

NCT ID: NCT01228838

Last Updated: 2012-09-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

183 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of NGX-1998 applied for 5 minutes for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a 12-week multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled evaluation of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of NGX-1998 for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Eligible subjects will have pain from PHN, with average numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) scores during screening of 4 to 9 (inclusive). Painful areas of up to 1500 cm2 will be treated during a single Test Article application. Subjects will be randomly assigned to receive NGX-1998 (10% or 20% w/w) or placebo according to an unequal allocation scheme of 2:2:1. Subjects will also be stratified by gender.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postherpetic Neuralgia Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

postherpetic neuralgia PHN capsaicin herpes zoster shingles analgesics neuropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NGX-1998, 10% w/w capsaicin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NGX-1998

Intervention Type DRUG

Capsaicin topical liquid to be applied for 5 minutes one time only.

NGX-1998, 20% w/w capsaicin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NGX-1998

Intervention Type DRUG

Capsaicin topical liquid to be applied for 5 minutes one time only.

Placebo liquid

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo Liquid

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo topical liquid to be applied for 5 minutes one time only.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

NGX-1998

Capsaicin topical liquid to be applied for 5 minutes one time only.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Liquid

Placebo topical liquid to be applied for 5 minutes one time only.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Between 18 and 90 years of age, inclusive.
* Diagnosis of PHN with at least six (6) months of pain since shingles vesicle crusting.
* Average NPRS scores for PHN-associated pain during Days -14 to -4 of 4 to 9, inclusive.
* Intact, unbroken skin over the painful area(s) to be treated.
* If taking chronic pain medications, be on a stable (not PRN) regimen for at least 21 days prior to Test Article Application Visit and willing to maintain medications at same stable dose(s) and schedule throughout the study.
* Female subjects with child-bearing potential must have a negative serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) pregnancy test, to be performed within 7 days of the Test Article Application Visit.
* All subjects must be willing to use effective methods of birth control and/or refrain from participating in a conception process during the study.
* If breastfeeding, the subject should agree not to breastfeed their child after treatment on the treatment day.
* Be willing and able to comply with protocol requirements for the duration of study participation.
* Subjects must sign an informed consent form for this study approved by the Investigator's Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee (IRB/IEC).

Exclusion Criteria

* Concomitant opioid medication, unless orally or transdermally administered and not exceeding a total daily dose of morphine 60 mg/day, or equivalent. Parenteral opioid use is excluded.
* Unavailability of an effective medication for treatment related discomfort for the subject, such as unwillingness to use opioid analgesics during study treatment, or high tolerance to opioids precluding the ability to relieve treatment-associated discomfort.
* Active substance abuse or history of chronic substance abuse within the past year, or prior chronic substance abuse judged likely to recur during the study period.
* Recent use (within 21 days preceding the Test Article Application Visit \[Day 0\]) of any topically applied pain medication on the painful areas.
* Receipt of Qutenza® within 12 months of the Test Article Application Visit (Day 0). Subjects who have received Qutenza® 12 months or more before Test Article Application Visit (Day 0), and who did not respond should also be excluded.
* Participation in another drug research study within 30 days preceding the Test Article Application Visit (Day 0).
* Current use of any Class I anti-arrhythmic drugs or III anti-arrhythmic drugs.
* Diabetes mellitus, unless well-controlled as evidenced by an HBA1c level less than or equal to nine percent (9%).
* A recent history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events or unstable hypertension, unless adequately controlled by medication.
* Significant pain of an etiology other than PHN, for example, compression-related neuropathies, fibromyalgia or arthritis.
* Painful PHN areas located on the face, above the hairline of the scalp, and/or in proximity to mucous membranes.
* Any implanted medical device for the treatment of neuropathic pain.
* History of hypersensitivity to capsaicin, local anesthetics or any components of the CTLs, Cleansing Gel or the lidocaine (2.5%) / prilocaine (2.5%) topical anesthetic cream.
* Patients with glucose-6 phosphate dehydrogenase deficiencies.
* Significant ongoing or untreated abnormalities or conditions, including active malignancy defined as treatment required in the last five (5) years, that in the opinion of the Investigator would interfere with the ability to complete the study or the evaluation of AEs.
* Patients with congenital or idiopathic methemoglobinemia.
* Recent history of a significant medical-surgical intervention in the judgment of the Investigator; examples include but are not limited to major surgery or percutaneous angioplasty/coronary artery stent placement within the past 3 months, and receipt of immunosuppressive therapy within 3 months, prior to the Test Article Application Visit \[Day 0\].
* Evidence of cognitive impairment including dementia that may interfere with subject's ability to complete daily pain diaries requiring subject's recall of average PHN pain level in the past 24 hours.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NeurogesX

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Trudy Vanhove, MD, PhD, MBA

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

NeurogesX

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Napa, California, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

North Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Bloomington, Illinois, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Hyannis, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Webster, Texas, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Wenatchee, Washington, United States

Site Status

NeurogesX Investigational Site

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C204

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id