Study to Compare Self-administered and Nurse-administered Intradermal Influenza Vaccine

NCT ID: NCT01224613

Last Updated: 2011-06-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

276 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-11-30

Study Completion Date

2011-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of self-administered intradermal influenza vaccine (Intanza)to nurse-administered.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants will be randomized at visit one to either receive self-administered or nurse-administered intradermal influenza vaccine (Intanza). A blood sample will be taken prior to vaccination and 21 days post-vaccination. Participants will record information in a memory aid for 7 days including daily temperatures, solicited, unsolicited and general reactions. They will be called on study Day 8 to collect this information. Participants will return 21-24 days later for follow-up serology and review of adverse events.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Influenza

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intanza - self-administered

Self-administered intradermal influenza vaccine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intanza

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.1 mL of Intanza intradermally at visit # 1

Intanza - nurse-administered

Nurse-administered intradermal influenza vaccine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Intanza

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.1 mL of Intanza intradermally at visit #1

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intanza

0.1 mL of Intanza intradermally at visit # 1

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Intanza

0.1 mL of Intanza intradermally at visit #1

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Influenza Vaccine (Split Virion, Inactivated) Influenza Vaccine (Split Virion, Inactivated)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Medically stable persons between age of 18-60
* Available during the trial period and for follow-up
* Able to read, understand, and sign informed consent
* Able to be contacted by telephone for follow-up of adverse events

Exclusion Criteria

* Use of experimental vaccines within the month prior to study entry, or expected use of experimental or licensed vaccines or blood/blood products during the duration of the study.
* Receipt of immunoglobulin or other blood product within 3 months prior to enrollment
* Receipt of other licensed vaccines within the preceding 4 weeks
* History of a severe reaction following influenza vaccination
* Use of cytotoxic therapy or biologic modifiers in the previous 2 years.
* Plans to receive cytotoxic therapy during the study period.
* Concurrent acute moderate to severe illness. (Vaccination will be deferred until recovery. Subjects with mild illnesses with fever ≤37.8ºC orally may be enrolled).
* History of medical disorder associated with immunosuppression (eg. including HIV-infected individuals, transplant recipients)
* History of chronic lung, cardiac, renal or liver disease, which has required hospitalization in the last year.
* Receipt of any high-dose daily systemic corticosteroids (inhaled steroids are acceptable) within two weeks of study entry. High dose is defined as a dose of 20 mg of prednisone daily or its equivalent. Topical steroids are allowed.
* Failure to give written, informed consent
* History of febrile illness (\>37.8ºC orally) within the past 72 hours (immunization may be deferred).
* Known allergy to eggs or other components of vaccine (i.e., thimerosal)
* History of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IWK Health Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

MCM Vaccines B.V.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dalhousie University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Canadian Center for Vaccinology

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shelly McNeil, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Canadian Center for Vaccinology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Canadian Center for Vaccinology

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Coleman BL, McGeer AJ, Halperin SA, Langley JM, Shamout Y, Taddio A, Shah V, McNeil SA. A randomized control trial comparing immunogenicity, safety, and preference for self- versus nurse-administered intradermal influenza vaccine. Vaccine. 2012 Sep 28;30(44):6287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22902784 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SP1002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Higher Dose Intradermal H5 Vaccine
NCT00439335 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Inactivated Influenza Via Jet Injection
NCT02290691 COMPLETED PHASE4
Routes of Immunization and Flu Immune Responses
NCT01707602 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2