Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Affect the Incidence of pH1N1 Influenza?

NCT ID: NCT01001325

Last Updated: 2012-04-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

468 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-31

Study Completion Date

2010-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Since the onset of the 2009 pandemic, several observational public health investigations in Canada have identified evidence that suggests that adults, particularly younger adults, who have previously received seasonal influenza vaccine are at increased risk of infection with the 2009 pandemic strain of H1N1 (pH1N1). Investigations in Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom have not identified this effect. While it is not possible to have an answer to whether this affect is real prior to the second wave of the 2009 pandemic, it remains vital to future influenza vaccination programs that the hypothesis that, in 2009, seasonal vaccine increases or decreases the risk of pH1N1 infection be confirmed or refuted.

The objective of this study is to determine whether Ontario adults aged 18-60 years who receive the 2009 seasonal influenza vaccine will be at a 2 fold or greater increased risk of infection with influenza pH1N1 during the second or third wave of the 2009 pandemic.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will be an observer -blind randomized controlled trial.

This study will primarily recruit patients from an existing cohort of adult health care and other workers in Toronto, as of September 15, 2009, almost 1000 adults are participating in this cohort; with approximately 75 new cohort members being recruited weekly (target is 1300). Recruitment will be supplemented by enrollment at Hamilton Health Sciences Centre (N\~3920 employees plus physicians \& midwives) and Queen Elizabeth II Health Centre in Halifax (N\~6000 employees plus physicians \& midwives).

To date, health care workers in the Toronto cohort have been recruited at the Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto East General Hospital, and North York General Hospital. Recruitment is just beginning at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, and the University Health Network.

Non-health care workers are being recruited from several large Toronto employers of primarily office workers. These include the Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion, the head offices of the Ontario Power Generation Corporation, the Art Gallery of Ontario, and the head offices of Scotia Bank. Non-health care workers should meet inclusion criteria and should not work primarily with children or from a home office.

Participants in the study are completing web-based diaries weekly, and, whenever they develop symptoms possibly compatible with influenza, are submitting nasal swabs, and completing symptom diaries daily while ill. Nasal swabs are tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on a same or next day basis with antivirals prescribed to participants who develop influenza.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Influenza

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Seasonal influenza vaccination

Receipt of Fluviral seasonal (2009-2010, Canadian) influenza vaccination as per manufacturers specification

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fluviral influenza vaccine, 2009-2010

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.5 mL intramuscular

Placebo

0.5 mL normal saline

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Normal saline

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.5 mL intramuscular

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fluviral influenza vaccine, 2009-2010

0.5 mL intramuscular

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Normal saline

0.5 mL intramuscular

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 18 to 60 years old, inclusive, as of September 1st, 2009;
2. understand the study, agree to its provisions, and give written informed consent prior to entry;
3. available for follow-up during the study period;
4. have convenient access to a computer with internet access and basic skills for use of the internet;

Exclusion Criteria

1. planning to spend more than two consecutive weeks outside of Canada from October 1, 2009 to April 15th 2010.
2. received immunoglobulin within six months of study entry;
3. has already received a 2009 seasonal influenza vaccine (southern or northern hemisphere)
4. has had laboratory-confirmed infection with 2009 H1N1 influenza
5. is participating in a clinical trial that would result in the receipt of investigational medication during the study period;
6. allergic to eggs, to influenza vaccine, or any components of the seasonal influenza vaccine
7. has had a previous severe adverse event associated with an influenza vaccine
8. has a significant chronic underlying illness that would warrant seasonal influenza vaccine in a usual year, or is known to be pregnant.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Allison J McGeer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

Brenda L. Coleman, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

Natasha Crowcroft, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ontario Agency for Health Protection & Promotion

Karen Green, MSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

Kevin Katz, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

North York General Hospital

Mark Loeb, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hamilton Health Sciences Centre

Donald Low, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL

Shelly McNeil, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre

Matthew Muller, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Unity Health Toronto

Andrew Simor, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

North York General Hospital

North York, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRT113936

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.