Non-virologic Methods to Diagnose Treatment Eligibility in HIV-exposed Infants

NCT ID: NCT01222130

Last Updated: 2014-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1126 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to develop and evaluate a set of non-virologic diagnostic algorithms to monitor HIV-exposed children of unknown infection status for treatment eligibility during the first year of life. The results of this cross sectional study are expected to be used in development of a series of non-virologic algorithms to determining treatment eligibility among HIV-exposed children in settings where polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing is not available and to guide the judicious use of PCR testing among HIV-exposed children in settings where PCR is available. These results will directly inform program implementation in Zambia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite recent scientific advances in prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT), substantial donor investment, and national commitments to PMTCT program roll-out, pediatric HIV/AIDS remains a largely uncontrolled epidemic. Unless some intervention is undertaken, more than half of children who become HIV-infected will die by their second birthday. Yet in sub-Saharan Africa, the majority of infected children die without ever having confirmation of their HIV status, having never had the chance to begin life-saving antiretroviral therapy (ART). Recognizing the need to provide children with greater access to care, the World Health Organization (WHO) has advised countries that at least 10% of patients receiving ART should be children. However, most programs fall well short of this target.

Unlike diagnosis in adults, definitive diagnosis of HIV in children less than 18 months of age requires virologic testing. Maternal IgG antibodies cross the placenta into the fetal circulation through pregnancy and are also secreted in breast milk. As infants may retain these maternal antibodies for up to 18 months after birth, conventional HIV antibody tests are of limited use in determining positive infection status. Instead it is necessary to directly identify HIV infection using a virologic method, typically polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing to detect viral DNA or RNA.

PCR testing is expensive and, in most developing countries, available only through specialty laboratories. Because PCR testing is more complex than other common HIV laboratory assays (e.g. CD4+ cell counting), it requires technicians with considerably more training and technical skill, involves longer sample preparation time, and can be considerably more costly than other diagnostic tests. Thus, most countries with large populations of HIV-infected children have extremely limited capacity to carry out PCR testing. Even where PCR is available, pediatric HIV diagnosis may remain difficult in breastfeeding populations because infants are at continued risk of infection until breastfeeding is completely stopped. A negative PCR test during breastfeeding does not guarantee that the infant will remain uninfected. The alternative - serial testing for HIV infection - would result in an exponential increase in cost.

Indeed, a convincing argument can be made that rather than monitoring HIV-exposed breastfeeding children for HIV infection, it may be more appropriate to simply monitor for treatment eligibility, followed by a definitive antibody test at 15-18 months or a few months after breastfeeding has stopped. Those children who meet criteria for treatment could be commenced on ART; those who do not would continue to undergo periodic screening until they were weaned and old enough to have a final (definitive) antibody test. For HIV-exposed infants without access to HIV PCR testing - the vast majority in Africa - development of such an algorithm would have the obvious benefit of providing reliable evaluation for treatment eligibility in the first 18 months of life. Even in settings where HIV PCR testing is available - but may be limited - the introduction of such algorithms could reduce the volume of HIV PCR tests required at a programmatic level, and thus lead to substantial cost-savings.

The overall goal of this protocol is to develop and evaluate a set of non-virologic diagnostic algorithms that can be used to monitor HIV-exposed children of unknown infection status for treatment eligibility during the first 12 weeks of life, with validation of our model among HIV-exposed children up to 12 months of age. We will evaluate the performance of different algorithms in two separate but common scenarios in Africa: (1) where infant PCR testing is not available, and (2) where infant PCR may be available, but poorly accessible due to cost and resource considerations. Although DNA PCR testing has become available in Zambia, only three sites currently provide this type of testing and capacity may be limited for country-wide screening. Our study was designed to determine HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy (ART) eligibility using more commonly used "non-virologic" tests, such as CD4, CD8, HIV antibody, total lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, and clinical staging. Previous studies have demonstrated that these indicators by themselves do not perform well in the absence of DNA PCR testing. In this exploratory study, we hypothesize that combinations of these tests - in formalized algorithms - can yield high performance and be used in rural settings where reliable DNA PCR services are not yet available or remain limited.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* mother with documented HIV infections
* mother willing to give informed consent for participation
* mother willing to allow child to participant in the study
* infant equal or less than 60 weeks of age

Exclusion Criteria

* infants accompanied by someone other than the mother
* infants already received antiretroviral therapy
Maximum Eligible Age

60 Weeks

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Benjamin Chi, MD, MSc

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

George Health Centre

Lusaka, Lusaka Province, Zambia

Site Status

Kamwala Health Centre

Lusaka, Lusaka Province, Zambia

Site Status

Matero Reference Health Centre

Lusaka, Lusaka Province, Zambia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Zambia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MQ-00-6-300-01206-0-00

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.