Non-virologic Methods to Diagnose Treatment Eligibility in HIV-exposed Infants
NCT ID: NCT01222130
Last Updated: 2014-09-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1126 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-07-31
2011-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Point of Care Virologic Testing to Improve Outcomes of HIV-Infected Children
NCT02682810
Surveillance Monitoring for ART Toxicities Study in HIV Uninfected Children Born to HIV Infected Women
NCT01310023
Diagnosis of HIV and Early Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation Among HIV-1 Infected Infants
NCT03133728
HIV Diagnosis in Hospitalized Malawian Infants
NCT01388452
Long Term Outcomes of Therapy in Women Initiated on Lifelong ART Because of Pregnancy in DR Congo
NCT03048669
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Unlike diagnosis in adults, definitive diagnosis of HIV in children less than 18 months of age requires virologic testing. Maternal IgG antibodies cross the placenta into the fetal circulation through pregnancy and are also secreted in breast milk. As infants may retain these maternal antibodies for up to 18 months after birth, conventional HIV antibody tests are of limited use in determining positive infection status. Instead it is necessary to directly identify HIV infection using a virologic method, typically polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing to detect viral DNA or RNA.
PCR testing is expensive and, in most developing countries, available only through specialty laboratories. Because PCR testing is more complex than other common HIV laboratory assays (e.g. CD4+ cell counting), it requires technicians with considerably more training and technical skill, involves longer sample preparation time, and can be considerably more costly than other diagnostic tests. Thus, most countries with large populations of HIV-infected children have extremely limited capacity to carry out PCR testing. Even where PCR is available, pediatric HIV diagnosis may remain difficult in breastfeeding populations because infants are at continued risk of infection until breastfeeding is completely stopped. A negative PCR test during breastfeeding does not guarantee that the infant will remain uninfected. The alternative - serial testing for HIV infection - would result in an exponential increase in cost.
Indeed, a convincing argument can be made that rather than monitoring HIV-exposed breastfeeding children for HIV infection, it may be more appropriate to simply monitor for treatment eligibility, followed by a definitive antibody test at 15-18 months or a few months after breastfeeding has stopped. Those children who meet criteria for treatment could be commenced on ART; those who do not would continue to undergo periodic screening until they were weaned and old enough to have a final (definitive) antibody test. For HIV-exposed infants without access to HIV PCR testing - the vast majority in Africa - development of such an algorithm would have the obvious benefit of providing reliable evaluation for treatment eligibility in the first 18 months of life. Even in settings where HIV PCR testing is available - but may be limited - the introduction of such algorithms could reduce the volume of HIV PCR tests required at a programmatic level, and thus lead to substantial cost-savings.
The overall goal of this protocol is to develop and evaluate a set of non-virologic diagnostic algorithms that can be used to monitor HIV-exposed children of unknown infection status for treatment eligibility during the first 12 weeks of life, with validation of our model among HIV-exposed children up to 12 months of age. We will evaluate the performance of different algorithms in two separate but common scenarios in Africa: (1) where infant PCR testing is not available, and (2) where infant PCR may be available, but poorly accessible due to cost and resource considerations. Although DNA PCR testing has become available in Zambia, only three sites currently provide this type of testing and capacity may be limited for country-wide screening. Our study was designed to determine HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy (ART) eligibility using more commonly used "non-virologic" tests, such as CD4, CD8, HIV antibody, total lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, and clinical staging. Previous studies have demonstrated that these indicators by themselves do not perform well in the absence of DNA PCR testing. In this exploratory study, we hypothesize that combinations of these tests - in formalized algorithms - can yield high performance and be used in rural settings where reliable DNA PCR services are not yet available or remain limited.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* mother willing to give informed consent for participation
* mother willing to allow child to participant in the study
* infant equal or less than 60 weeks of age
Exclusion Criteria
* infants already received antiretroviral therapy
60 Weeks
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
OTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Benjamin Chi, MD, MSc
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
George Health Centre
Lusaka, Lusaka Province, Zambia
Kamwala Health Centre
Lusaka, Lusaka Province, Zambia
Matero Reference Health Centre
Lusaka, Lusaka Province, Zambia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MQ-00-6-300-01206-0-00
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.