Study of Live, Attenuated Influenza Vaccination in Preterm and Full-Term Infants

NCT ID: NCT01194297

Last Updated: 2014-08-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

3 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-31

Study Completion Date

2012-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Severe influenza respiratory disease is increasingly recognized in children. Influenza hospitalization rates in high-risk infants, such as premature infants, are increased some five-fold over rates in other children. The recently-licensed live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) promotes better immune responses than the trivalent inactivated vaccine, but can cause wheezing. The balance of risks and benefits for LAIV in extremely premature infants, who may be at increased risk for both influenza disease and vaccine side effects, is unknown.

The specific aim of this project is to compare the immune response and reactions of trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) and live, attenuated, intranasal influenza vaccine (LAIV) in groups of former premature (PT), very (V) LBW and former full-term (FT) infants aged 24-35 months.

The investigators hypothesize that the immune response in FT infants will be greater with LAIV than TIV, and that wheezing episodes will be no more than twice as frequent in LAIV as in TIV recipients.

The study will enroll 14 former premature, VLBW infants and 14 former full-term infants. Children will be randomized to receive one dose either TIV or LAIV. Vaccine reactions will be measured. One to two teaspoons mL of blood will be drawn at 0 and 7-14 days from immunization, and less than one teaspoon of blood will be drawn at 28-42 days.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background. Influenza infection causes an estimated 1 million deaths worldwide yearly. Severe influenza respiratory disease is increasingly recognized in children. Influenza hospitalization rates in high-risk infants, such as premature infants, are increased some five-fold over rates in other children. Influenza vaccine immunogenicity is generally modest even in healthy children, and influenza vaccines have been incompletely studied in premature infants. The recently-licensed live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is more immunogenic than the trivalent inactivated vaccine, but its use in infants and high risk children is limited by side effects. The risk/benefit ratio of LAIV in extremely premature infants, who may be at increased risk for both influenza disease and vaccine side effects, is unknown.

Aim. The specific aim of this project is to compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) and live, attenuated, intranasal influenza vaccine (LAIV) in groups of former premature (PT), very low birth weight (VLBW) and former full-term (FT) infants aged 24-35 months.

Hypotheses.

1. The humoral immunogenicity of LAIV, as measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI), will be greater than that of TIV. This will be the co-primary outcome for this study.
2. Vaccine reactogenicity, as measured by medically-attended wheezing episodes, will be no more than twice as frequent in LAIV as in TIV recipients. This will be the co-primary outcome for this study.
3. Functional B-cell responses, as measured by antibody secreting cell (ASC) enzyme linked immunospot (ELISPOT), will be greater in LAIV-immunized infants than TIV-immunized infants.
4. Peak T-cell cytokine responses, as measured by interferon gamma (IFNγ), interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-4 ELISPOT, will be greater in LAIV-immunized infants than TIV-immunized infants.
5. Hemagglutinin-specific nasal immunoglobulin A (IgA) will be measureable following LAIV immunization.
6. Former premature infants will have similar adaptive immune responses, but elevated reactogenicity to both vaccines, when compared to former full-term infants.

Design. The study will enroll 14 former premature, VLBW infants and 14 former full-term infants. Subjects, who will be eligible to receive either TIV or LAIV as part of routine care, will be randomized to receive one dose either TIV or LAIV, according to prevailing recommendations for influenza immunization. Randomization will be stratified by prematurity status. Vaccine reactogenicity will be measured by using parent diaries following immunization and questionnaires at each visit. Five to 10 mL of blood will be drawn at 0 and 7-14 days from immunization for isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and 1 mL of blood will be drawn for serum separation for antibody determination at 0 and 28-42 days. Antibody levels and T- and B-cell responses to vaccine will be measured.

Potential Impact. This study is designed to assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of two current influenza vaccines in premature infants. The data will be used to estimate the sample size for a definitive trial in younger premature infants.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Influenza

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Live attenuated influenza vaccine

One dose of live attenuated influenza vaccine, according to routine immunization recommendations

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Live attenuated influenza vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

One dose of live attenuated influenza vaccine, according to routine immunization recommendations

Inactivated influenza vaccine

One dose of inactivated influenza vaccine, according to routine immunization recommendations

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Inactivated influenza vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

One dose of inactivated influenza vaccine, according to routine immunization recommendations

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Live attenuated influenza vaccine

One dose of live attenuated influenza vaccine, according to routine immunization recommendations

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Inactivated influenza vaccine

One dose of inactivated influenza vaccine, according to routine immunization recommendations

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

FluMist Fluzone

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects must meet all relevant criteria (by time of influenza vaccination) to participate.

1. (a) Former premature (\<32 weeks' gestation at birth), VLBW (\<1500 grams' birth weight) infant, 24 months, 0 days - 35 months, 31 days of age, OR (b) Former full-term (37-42 weeks' gestation at birth), normal birth weight (\>2500 grams' birth weight) infant, 24 months, 0 days - 35 months, 31 days of age.
2. Influenza immunization in prior season.
3. Eligible for either influenza immunization (TIV or LAIV).
4. Parental permission.
5. Parents likely to be able to comply with study visits.

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects may not participate if they meet any one of these criteria.

1. Known immunodeficiency in child or in a close household contact.
2. History of:

* Recurrent episodes of wheezing,
* Medically-attended wheezing illness in past year, or
* Hospitalization for a wheezing illness.
3. Systemic corticosteroid administration at time of influenza vaccination.
4. Requiring supplemental oxygen at time of influenza vaccination.
5. Contraindication to either influenza immunization (e.g. egg allergy, aspirin therapy).
6. Physician-diagnosed influenza illness in the current influenza season.
7. Any condition determined by investigator as likely to interfere with evaluation of the vaccine or be a significant potential health risk to the subject.
Minimum Eligible Age

24 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Rochester

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carl D'Angio

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carl T. D'Angio, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Rochester

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

25914

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Influenza Immunity in Children
NCT02559505 COMPLETED NA
Safety of LAIV4 in Children With Asthma
NCT03600428 COMPLETED PHASE4