Randomized Trial of Alternative HPV Vaccination Schedules in Males in a University Setting

NCT ID: NCT01184079

Last Updated: 2014-03-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators propose a randomized, open label trial of the immunogenicity of HPV vaccine among males 18-24 years old, comparing an on-time administration of the third dose with delayed administration of the third dose. All participants would receive the first and second doses according to schedule. They would be randomized to either Dose 3 at 6 months or Dose 3 at 12 months.

Hypothesis: The Geometric mean titers in the 12 month test group (T) are non-inferior to the usual timing control group (C):

H0: δ ≤ -δ0 versus H1: δ \> -δ0 where δ = log (GMTT )- log (GMTC) and δ0 is the pre-specified non-inferiority margin

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1\. Specific Aims and Overview: The investigators propose a randomized, open label trial of HPV vaccine among males 18-24 years old, comparing an on-time administration of the third dose with delayed administration of the third dose. All participants would receive the first and second doses according to schedule. They would be randomized to either Dose 3 at 6 months or Dose 3 at 12 months.

Blood would be drawn for titers at twice from all participants: pre-dose 1 and one month post Dose 3.

No cytology studies or DNA studies will be conducted.

1.1 Aims:

1. Determine if delay in the third dose is immunologically non-inferior to the standard administration schedule (1 month post-dose 3).
2. Determine the side effect profile of a delayed third dose, in comparison to the standard schedule.
3. Determine the preference and compliance of the men for the timing of the third dose.

1.2 Hypothesis for non- inferiority:

The GMTs in the test group (T) are non-inferior to the usual timing control group (C):

H0: δ ≤ -δ0 versus H1: δ \> -δ0 where δ = log (GMTT )- log (GMTC) and δ0 is the pre-specified non-inferiority margin.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine Human Papillomavirus Vaccine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

12 months

Administration of 3rd dose at 12 months quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.5 mL of quadrivalent HPV vaccine at enrollment, 2 months, and 12 months

6 month

Administration of 3rd dose at 6 months quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

0.5 mL of quadrivalent HPV vaccine at enrollment, 2 months, and 6 months

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine

0.5 mL of quadrivalent HPV vaccine at enrollment, 2 months, and 12 months

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine

0.5 mL of quadrivalent HPV vaccine at enrollment, 2 months, and 6 months

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Gardasil Gardasil

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males age 18-26

Exclusion Criteria

* Hospitalization within the past year
* Previous HPV vaccination

\>/=5 sexual partners (i.e., insertive intercourse) No other drug studies within 30 days of proposed HPV vaccination
* History of genital warts
* Immunosuppression
* Other vaccines within 8 days of proposed HPV vaccination
* Hypersensitivity to yeast or HPV vaccine components
* Known autoimmune disorders
* Receipt of immunoglobulins or blood product within 90 days of enrollment (may defer until 90 days completed)
* Serious Adverse Reaction to HPV vaccine
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

26 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Richard Zimmerman

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard K Zimmerman, MD MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zimmerman RK, Nowalk MP, Lin CJ, Fox DE, Ko FS, Wettick E, Cost G, Hand L, Hayes J, Michaels M. Randomized trial of an alternate human papillomavirus vaccine administration schedule in college-aged women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Aug;19(8):1441-7. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1753.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20629576 (View on PubMed)

Lin CJ, Zimmerman RK, Nowalk MP, Huang HH, Raviotta JM. Randomized controlled trial of two dosing schedules for human papillomavirus vaccination among college age males. Vaccine. 2014 Feb 3;32(6):693-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.098. Epub 2013 Dec 14.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24342252 (View on PubMed)

Zimmerman RK, Lin CJ, Raviotta JM, Nowalk MP. Do vitamin D levels affect antibody titers produced in response to HPV vaccine? Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(10):2345-9. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1062955.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26176493 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRO10070407

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

I#0021806

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IISP#38206

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intradermal, Fractional Dose of HPV Vaccines:
NCT04235257 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4
Immunogenicity of Fractional Dose of the HPV Vaccines
NCT05291871 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE4