Comparing Immune Response of 2 vs 3 HPV Doses (27-45 Years Old)
NCT ID: NCT05672927
Last Updated: 2025-10-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
618 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-18
2027-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Immunogenicity and Safety of Two 2-dose Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Schedules in 9-14 Year Old Girls
NCT01381575
GARDASIL 9: 3 Dose vs. 2 Dose With Delayed 3rd Dose
NCT03943875
Evaluating the 2-dose Immunization Schedule of Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 in Adolescent Females
NCT02740777
A Phase II Trial Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety Profile of HPV Vaccine
NCT05694728
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Healthy Adult Women of 26 Years of Age and Older
NCT00294047
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Females, 3-dose standard
Three doses of the 9-valent HPV vaccine to be administered to the comparison group (27-45 years of age) at 0, 2, and 6 months.
9-valent HPV vaccine, 3 doses standard timing
This will be the comparison group for the 2-dose group.
Females, 2-dose alternative
Two doses of the 9-valent HPV vaccine to be administered to the experimental group (27-45 years of age) at 0 and 6 months. Additional HPV vaccine dose will be offered after final blood draw at 12 months.
9-valent HPV vaccine, 2 doses alternate timing
Evaluate 2 doses of the 9-valent HPV vaccine across a 12-month period following the 1st dose among 27-45-year-old females.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
9-valent HPV vaccine, 2 doses alternate timing
Evaluate 2 doses of the 9-valent HPV vaccine across a 12-month period following the 1st dose among 27-45-year-old females.
9-valent HPV vaccine, 3 doses standard timing
This will be the comparison group for the 2-dose group.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Ability to give informed consent.
3. Has not received any prior doses of the HPV vaccine. This will be verified by the person and state registry (Immtrac), as well as the person's electronic medical record.
4. Reliable telephone access for the duration of the project.
5. Can read and speak in either English or Spanish.
6. Identified source of funding for vaccine such as Medicaid, private health insurance, Texas Healthy Women program, etc.
7. Reports consistent use of reliable birth control and plans to continue its use through study month 13.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Has an immunodeficiency or autoimmune disease such as HIV infection, lymphoma, leukemia, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, or other autoimmune condition.
3. Currently receiving treatment or medication that can suppress immune function including radiation therapy, chemotherapy, cyclosporin, leflunomide (Arava), TNF-α antagonists, monoclonal antibody therapies (including rituximab \[Rituxan\]), intravenous gamma globulin (IVIG), antilymphocyte sera, other therapy known to interfere with the immune response, or systemic corticosteroids (by mouth or intramuscular injection). Those using or have used steroids that are inhaled, placed in the eye, applied on the skin, or injected into the joint/soft tissue will be considered eligible for the study.
4. History of splenectomy
5. Known allergies to any vaccine components, including aluminum, yeast or Benzonase.
6. Febrile at ≥100°F in the 24 hours prior to vaccination. The patients may be rescheduled for a later date.
7. History of thrombocytopenia or any coagulation disorder that would contraindicate intramuscular injections.
8. History of \>10 sexual partners in their lifetime at time of enrollment
9. Plans to move out of the Galveston/Houston area in the 13 months following study entry.
27 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas
OTHER
The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abbey B Berenson, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Texas
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
22-0243
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.