The Clinic Treatment Project

NCT ID: NCT01178554

Last Updated: 2011-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

203 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Clinic Treatment Project tested two alternative methods of delivering evidence-based practices within public community-based mental health clinics, using training and supervision procedures designed for the settings and users.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Clinic Treatment Project focused on ethnically diverse youths aged 7-13 who were referred to community-based mental health clinics for problems involving disruptive behaviors, depression, anxiety, and any combination of these. Using a randomized block design, therapists were randomly assigned to deliver usual treatment procedures (usual care, or UC) in their clinics or evidence-based practices deployed in two forms: (a) standard manual treatment (SMT), using full treatment manuals, one at a time, exactly as they have been tested in clinical trials, and (b) modular manual treatment (MMT) in which therapists learn the component practices of the standard manuals but individualize the use of the components for each child using a guiding clinical algorithm. Unlike the SMT approach, the MMT approach allows the duration and sequencing of techniques to be individualized in an effort to fit the child's needs and allows the clinician to draw techniques from outside the target disorder domain when needed (e.g., to address noncompliance during the course of treating depression). Both SMT and MMT were supported by training and supervision procedures designed to fit providers and their clinic contexts. Assessments were carried out at pre-treatment, at post-treatment, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-ups. Assessments carried out at pre-treatment included(a) individual youth problems and disorders; (b) individual youth functioning at home and school; and (c) clinic staff beliefs and attitudes toward their work and workplace. Assessments carried out at post-treatment and follow-up only included measures of (a) youth, parent, and therapist satisfaction with treatment; (b) youth, parent and therapist views on the quality of the therapeutic relationship; and (c) treatment costs. Assessments carried out at follow-up only included (a) parent reports of any mental health service use following project treatment, and (b) therapist reports on the extent to which the treatment procedures they used in the project are continued after project termination. Analyses will address critical questions about deployment of evidence-based youth practices to clinical care settings.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anxiety Depression Problem Behavior

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual Care Treatment

Usual Care therapists could use any treatment procedures they used regularly in their clinical practice.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

psychotherapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Usual Care therapists could use any treatment procedures they used regularly in their clinical practice.

Standard Manual Treatment (SMT)

Evidence-based treatment manuals were used for anxiety (Coping Cat Manual; Kendall, 1994; Kendall et al., 1994 ), depression (Primary and Secondary Control Enhancement Training; Weisz et al., 1997, 1998), and conduct problems (Defiant Children Manual; Barkley, 1997).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

evidence-based treatment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Evidence-based treatment manuals were used for anxiety (Coping Cat Manual; Kendall, 1994; Kendall et al., 1994 ), depression (Primary and Secondary Control Enhancement Training; Weisz et al., 1997, 1998), and conduct problems (Defiant Children Manual; Barkley, 1997).

Modular Maual Treatment (MMT)

Therapists used a modular manual (Modular Approach to Therapy for Children with Anxiety, Depression, or Conduct Problems; Chorpita \& Weisz, 2004) to help children with primary problems of anxiety, depression, and conduct.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

modular evidence-based treatment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Therapists used the Modular Approach to Therapy for Children with Anxiety, Depression, or Conduct Problems (MATCH-ADC; Chorpita \& Weisz, 2004)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

psychotherapy

Usual Care therapists could use any treatment procedures they used regularly in their clinical practice.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

evidence-based treatment

Evidence-based treatment manuals were used for anxiety (Coping Cat Manual; Kendall, 1994; Kendall et al., 1994 ), depression (Primary and Secondary Control Enhancement Training; Weisz et al., 1997, 1998), and conduct problems (Defiant Children Manual; Barkley, 1997).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

modular evidence-based treatment

Therapists used the Modular Approach to Therapy for Children with Anxiety, Depression, or Conduct Problems (MATCH-ADC; Chorpita \& Weisz, 2004)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Treatment As Usual (TAU) Case Management best practices evidence-based practices treatment manuals modular treatments best practices evidence-based practices

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 7 - 13 year olds and their parents
* seeking services at community mental health clinics
* primary problem or disorder related to anxiety, depression, or conduct problems

Exclusion Criteria

* Child is younger than 7 years, 9 months or older than 13 on the day of the phone screen.
* Child has attempted suicide within the past year.
* Schizophrenic spectrum diagnosis (including MDD w/ psychotic features)
* Autism or another Pervasive Developmental Disorder (e.g., PDD NOS, Asperger's Disorder, Child Disintegrative Disorder, Rett's Disorder).
* Anorexia Nervosa
* Bulimia Nervosa
* Mental Retardation
* No relevant T-scores validate target disorders.
* ADHD identified as primary reason for seeking treatment at phone screen
* Child's sibling already included
* Child's medication has not been regulated for one month or longer
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

13 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

MacArthur Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Hawaii

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Illinois at Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Judge Baker Children's Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Judge Baker Children's Center

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John R. Weisz, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Judge Baker Children's Center

Bruce F. Chorpita, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Hawaii

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Hawaii at Manoa

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Judge Baker Children's Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chorpita BF, Bernstein A, Daleiden EL; Research Network on Youth Mental Health. Driving with roadmaps and dashboards: using information resources to structure the decision models in service organizations. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008 Mar;35(1-2):114-23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-007-0151-x. Epub 2007 Nov 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17987376 (View on PubMed)

Borntrager CF, Chorpita BF, Higa-McMillan C, Weisz JR. Provider attitudes toward evidence-based practices: are the concerns with the evidence or with the manuals? Psychiatr Serv. 2009 May;60(5):677-81. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.5.677.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19411357 (View on PubMed)

Ebesutani C, Bernstein A, Nakamura BJ, Chorpita BF, Higa-McMillan CK, Weisz JR; The Research Network on Youth Mental Health. Concurrent Validity of the Child Behavior Checklist DSM-Oriented Scales: Correspondence with DSM Diagnoses and Comparison to Syndrome Scales. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2010 Sep;32(3):373-384. doi: 10.1007/s10862-009-9174-9. Epub 2009 Nov 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20700377 (View on PubMed)

Chorpita BF, Reise S, Weisz JR, Grubbs K, Becker KD, Krull JL; Research Network on Youth Mental Health. Evaluation of the Brief Problem Checklist: child and caregiver interviews to measure clinical progress. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Aug;78(4):526-36. doi: 10.1037/a0019602.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20658809 (View on PubMed)

Ebesutani C, Bernstein A, Nakamura BJ, Chorpita BF, Weisz JR; Research Network on Youth Mental Health. A psychometric analysis of the revised child anxiety and depression scale--parent version in a clinical sample. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010 Feb;38(2):249-60. doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9363-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19830545 (View on PubMed)

Ho A, Weisz JR, Austin AA, Chorpita BF, Southam-Gerow M, Wells K, the Research Network on Youth Mental Health. Bridging science and community practice: Clinician and organizational engagement in community clinics in the clinic treatment project. Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Youth. Winter 2006;7:13-19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Martin JL, Weisz JR, Chorpita BF, Higa CK, Southam-Gerow M, Wells K, the Research Network on Youth Mental Health. Moving evidence-based practices into everyday clinical care settings: Addressing challenges associated with pathways to treatment, child characteristics, and structure of treatment. Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Youth. Winter 2006;7:5-21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Chorpita BF, Hoagwood K, Landsverk J, Weisz JR; Research Network on Youth Mental Health. Cultural exchange and the implementation of evidence-based practice: two case studies. J Evidence-Based Social Work. 2009 September;19(5):602-612.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Palinkas LA, Schoenwald SK, Hoagwood K, Landsverk J, Chorpita BF, Weisz JR; Research Network on Youth Mental Health. An ethnographic study of implementation of evidence-based treatments in child mental health: first steps. Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Jul;59(7):738-46. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.7.738.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18586990 (View on PubMed)

Weisz JR, Chorpita BF, Palinkas LA, Schoenwald SK, Miranda J, Bearman SK, Daleiden EL, Ugueto AM, Ho A, Martin J, Gray J, Alleyne A, Langer DA, Southam-Gerow MA, Gibbons RD; Research Network on Youth Mental Health. Testing standard and modular designs for psychotherapy treating depression, anxiety, and conduct problems in youth: a randomized effectiveness trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;69(3):274-82. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.147. Epub 2011 Nov 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22065252 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.child-steps.org/

Child System and Treatment Enhancement Projects

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

83423-0

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.