Comparison Study for Safety and Efficacy of Two Devices for the Treatment of the Great Saphenous Vein

NCT ID: NCT01173419

Last Updated: 2012-07-13

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: WITHDRAWN
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2010-07-31
• Study Completion Date: 2012-02-29

Brief Summary

This is a multi center, randomized, comparison study using two already cleared methods of treatment of the great saphenous vein (GSV). The hypothesis to be tested is that the use of the Venacure EVLT NeverTouch procedure is no worse than the RF ClosureFAST procedure for treatment of the GSV. Evaluation of post operative pain and bruising, quality of life assessments, adverse event assessments, confirmation of long term GSV closure, use of medications are criteria that will be evaluated during the course of this study.

Detailed Description

Some form of venous insufficiency affects up to 25% of men and 40% of women in the United States. While most persons seek treatment because varicose veins are unsightly, most will also experience symptoms such as aching pain, night cramps, leg fatigue, leg heaviness or leg restlessness. If left untreated, nearly 50% of patients with significant superficial venous insufficiency will experience chronic venous insufficiency characterized by lower extremity swelling, eczema, pigmentation, hemorrhage and ulceration.

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized study in subjects with symptomatic venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein. Subjects evaluated for participation will be those who, prior to the first visit, have elected to receive invasive treatment for the GSV insufficiency and have already received conservative treatment (i.e. use of compression hose).

Subjects will be randomized to receive one of two methods of treatment. VenaCure EVLT NeverTouch method of treatment or the RF ClosureFAST method of treatment.

Follow up visits will take place at 2, 7, 14 and 30 days post treatment where questionnaires (SF-36, CIVI Q2, Visual Analogue Scale), evaluation of GSV closure via duplex ultrasound (7 day and 30 day only), evaluation of ecchymosis, physician (or their designee) evaluation of venous disease (CEAP assessment and VCSS assessment), assessments of adverse events and review of concomitant medications (use of analgesics and other medications)will take place. These same evaluations with the exception of the use of the Visual Analogue Scale and the Ecchymosis evaluation will also take place at the 6 month and 12 month follow up visit timepoints.

Conditions

Varicose Veins; Venous Insufficiency

Keywords

Great Saphenous Vein

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

VenaCure EVLT NeverTouch

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

VenaCure EVLT NeverTouch

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Endovenous Laser Treatment (EVLT) uses laser energy, which is a highly concentrated beam of light to treat varicose veins.

RF ClosureFAST

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

VNUS RF ClosureFAST

Intervention Type: DEVICE

VNUS® RF ClosureFAST is a minimally invasive varicose vein treatment procedure that uses radiofrequency energy (electricity) to heat, collapse and seal off the targeted blood vessels.

Interventions

VNUS RF ClosureFAST

VNUS® RF ClosureFAST is a minimally invasive varicose vein treatment procedure that uses radiofrequency energy (electricity) to heat, collapse and seal off the targeted blood vessels.

Intervention Type: DEVICE

VenaCure EVLT NeverTouch

Endovenous Laser Treatment (EVLT) uses laser energy, which is a highly concentrated beam of light to treat varicose veins.

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Closure; VenaCure; EVLT; NeverTouch

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• male or female,
• 18 to 80 years of age,
• have documented symptomatic GSV disease defined by any of the following:
• C2 disease
• C3 disease
• C4A, C4B disease
• C5 disease
• C6 disease
• have not been previously treated for GSV,
• have multilevel venous reflux in the great saphenous vein greater than 0.5 seconds after distal compression/ release in the standing position,
• have palpable dorsalis pedis/ anterior tibial pulse or ABI >0.9 (unless calcified pressures) at screening,
• are able to comply with the protocol requirements,
• are able to comprehend and willing to sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF).

Exclusion Criteria

• has had a previous venous intervention on the same leg as planned current treatment,
• are in a known hypercoagulable state,
• have deep vein thrombosis or a history of deep vein thrombosis,
• have thrombus within the last three months in the vein segment to be treated,
• have an aneurysmal section in the vein segment to be treated (aneurysm is defined as 2 times greater than the adjacent vein),
• are not able to ambulate,
• have non staged adjunctive procedures such as sclerotherapy and/ or ambulatory phlebectomy. May elect to stage the procedure from the initial script, and not treat before the 30 day follow up visit is completed.
• are, in the opinion of the investigator, unable to comply with the schedule and protocol evaluations,
• are currently pregnant or breast feeding,
• have a known malignancy other than skin cancer,
• current use of anticoagulant medication,
• have any condition which in the opinion of the investigator could compromise subject safety or adherence to the protocol,
• has had treatment with any investigational agent within 30 days of visit 1.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 80 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Angiodynamics, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

David Gillespie, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Rochester

Locations

UC Davis Interventional and Vascular Radiology

Sacramento, California, United States

Batey Cardiovascular and Vein Center

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Midwest Institute for Minimally Invasive Therapies (MIMIT)

Melrose Park, Illinois, United States

Novi Vein Center

Novi, Michigan, United States

NYU Langone Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

University of Rochester Medical Center

Rochester, New York, United States

Countries

United States

Other Identifiers

PV-201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id