Efficacy and Safety Study of Oral CEM-101 Compared to Oral Levofloxacin in Treatment of Patients With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

NCT ID: NCT01168713

Last Updated: 2017-03-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

132 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-31

Study Completion Date

2011-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral CEM-101 compared to oral Levofloxacin in the treatment of adults with moderate to moderately severe community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia is an acute infection of the pulmonary parenchyma with symptoms such as fever or hypothermia, chills, rigors, chest pain, and/or dyspnea. The widespread emergence of antibiotic resistant pathogens, including the macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, has resulted in a need for new and effective antibiotics that have activity again CABP pathogens. CEM-101 is the first fluoroketolide with excellent in vitro and in vivo activity against resistant S. pneumoniae and other key typical and atypical bacterial respiratory pathogens.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Levofloxacin

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Levofloxacin

Intervention Type DRUG

Levofloxacin once daily for 5 days:

Levofloxacin 750 mg PO Days 1-5

CEM-101

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CEM-101

Intervention Type DRUG

CEM-101 once daily for 5 days:

CEM-101 800 mg PO Day 1

CEM-101 400 mg PO Days 2-5

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Levofloxacin

Levofloxacin once daily for 5 days:

Levofloxacin 750 mg PO Days 1-5

Intervention Type DRUG

CEM-101

CEM-101 once daily for 5 days:

CEM-101 800 mg PO Day 1

CEM-101 400 mg PO Days 2-5

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Levaquin Solithromycin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Diagnosis of community acquired bacterial pneumonia (e.g. cough with purulent sputum or change in character of sputum consistent with bacterial infection, dyspnea or tachypnea, chest pain due to pneumonia, fever, presence of rales and/or signs of consolidation).
2. No prior systemic antibacterial therapy, unless failed other therapy.
3. Chest Xray shows new lobar or multilobar infiltrate(s) consistent with acute bacterial pneumonia.
4. PORT Risk Class II, III, or IV \<=105
5. Ability to take oral medication.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease FEV1 \<30%.
2. Hospitalization within 90 days or residence in a long-term-care facility within 30 days prior to the onset of symptoms
3. Chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the previous 3 months.
4. Significant hepatic, hematological, renal abnormalities.
5. Any concomitant condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude an evaluation of a response or make it unlikely that the contemplated course of therapy and follow-up could be completed (e.g. life expectancy \<30 days).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Flagstaff, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Bell Gardens, California, United States

Site Status

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

LeMesa, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Montclaire, California, United States

Site Status

Norwalk, California, United States

Site Status

Oceanside, California, United States

Site Status

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Torrence, California, United States

Site Status

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

DeBary, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Blue Ridge, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Morton, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Dubuque, Iowa, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Fall River, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Traverse City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Carlisle, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Franklin, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Corsicana, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Draper, Utah, United States

Site Status

Magna, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Saint-Jérôme, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Trios-Rivieres, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Oldach D, Clark K, Schranz J, Das A, Craft JC, Scott D, Jamieson BD, Fernandes P. Randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 2 study comparing the efficacy and safety of oral solithromycin (CEM-101) to those of oral levofloxacin in the treatment of patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Jun;57(6):2526-34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00197-13. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23507282 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CE01-200

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.