Efficacy and Safety Study of Oral CEM-101 Compared to Oral Levofloxacin in Treatment of Patients With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
NCT ID: NCT01168713
Last Updated: 2017-03-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
132 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-08-31
2011-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety Study of Intravenous to Oral Solithromycin (CEM-101) Compared to Intravenous to Oral Moxifloxacin in Treatment of Patients With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
NCT01968733
Efficacy and Safety Study of Oral Solithromycin (CEM-101) Compared to Oral Moxifloxacin in Treatment of Patients With Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
NCT01756339
A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Levofloxacin Compared With Cefuroxime Axetil in the Treatment of Adults With Persistent Bronchitis Experiencing Rapid Onset of Severe Worsening of Symptoms Caused by Bacteria
NCT00269932
Study to Compare Lefamulin to Moxifloxacin (With or Without Linezolid) for the Treatment of Adults With Pneumonia
NCT02559310
A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Levofloxacin Compared With Oral Ciprofloxacin in the Treatment of Adults With Uncomplicated Infections of the Skin and the Supportive Layers Beneath the Skin
NCT00257062
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Levofloxacin
Levofloxacin
Levofloxacin once daily for 5 days:
Levofloxacin 750 mg PO Days 1-5
CEM-101
CEM-101
CEM-101 once daily for 5 days:
CEM-101 800 mg PO Day 1
CEM-101 400 mg PO Days 2-5
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Levofloxacin
Levofloxacin once daily for 5 days:
Levofloxacin 750 mg PO Days 1-5
CEM-101
CEM-101 once daily for 5 days:
CEM-101 800 mg PO Day 1
CEM-101 400 mg PO Days 2-5
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. No prior systemic antibacterial therapy, unless failed other therapy.
3. Chest Xray shows new lobar or multilobar infiltrate(s) consistent with acute bacterial pneumonia.
4. PORT Risk Class II, III, or IV \<=105
5. Ability to take oral medication.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Hospitalization within 90 days or residence in a long-term-care facility within 30 days prior to the onset of symptoms
3. Chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the previous 3 months.
4. Significant hepatic, hematological, renal abnormalities.
5. Any concomitant condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude an evaluation of a response or make it unlikely that the contemplated course of therapy and follow-up could be completed (e.g. life expectancy \<30 days).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Flagstaff, Arizona, United States
Bell Gardens, California, United States
Chula Vista, California, United States
LeMesa, California, United States
Los Angeles, California, United States
Montclaire, California, United States
Norwalk, California, United States
Oceanside, California, United States
Oxnard, California, United States
Pasadena, California, United States
Torrence, California, United States
Waterbury, Connecticut, United States
DeBary, Florida, United States
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Kissimmee, Florida, United States
Orlando, Florida, United States
Blue Ridge, Georgia, United States
Columbus, Georgia, United States
Savannah, Georgia, United States
Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
Morton, Illinois, United States
Dubuque, Iowa, United States
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Fall River, Massachusetts, United States
New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Traverse City, Michigan, United States
Butte, Montana, United States
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Akron, Ohio, United States
Carlisle, Ohio, United States
Eugene, Oregon, United States
West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States
Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States
Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
Franklin, Tennessee, United States
Corsicana, Texas, United States
Houston, Texas, United States
Houston, Texas, United States
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Draper, Utah, United States
Magna, Utah, United States
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada
Saint-Jérôme, Quebec, Canada
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Trios-Rivieres, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Oldach D, Clark K, Schranz J, Das A, Craft JC, Scott D, Jamieson BD, Fernandes P. Randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 2 study comparing the efficacy and safety of oral solithromycin (CEM-101) to those of oral levofloxacin in the treatment of patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Jun;57(6):2526-34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00197-13. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CE01-200
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.