FLAME: Investigate the Benefit of a Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in Prostate Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01168479
Last Updated: 2020-06-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
571 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-09-30
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hypofractionated Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in prostatE Cancer
NCT02853110
Hypofractionated Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in prostatE Cancer 2.0
NCT04045717
Standard Moderately Hypofractionated RT vs. Ultra-hypofractionated Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in Prostate Cancer
NCT05705921
Addition of a Focal Boost in External Beam Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer by Online Adaptive MR-guided Radiotherapy
NCT05373316
MRI-guided Focal Laser Ablation Prostate Cancer
NCT05370482
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Primary study objective: To demonstrate the superiority of the ablative microboost dose schedule regarding 5-year biochemical no evidence of disease rate compared to the current standard of care.
* Secondary study objectives: Establish and compare the rates of treatment-related toxicity, quality of life and disease-free survival.
Study design: Single blind prospective randomized controlled phase III trial.
Study population: Patients with intermediate or high risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Intermediate or high risk is defined according to the Ash et al. 2000 criteria as:
* One (intermediate-risk) or more (high-risk) factors: T2, or Gleasonscore=7, or iPSA 10-20 ng/mL
* One or more (high-risk) factors: T3, or Gleasonscore \>7, or iPSA \>20 ng/mL
Intervention: The standard arm receives the current gold standard, namely 77Gy to the prostate in 35 fractions of 2.2 Gy, 5 times per week. In the experimental arm patients receive in addition to the current gold standard of 77 Gy to the prostate an integrated boost to the macroscopically visible tumour to reach a total dose of 95 Gy in 35 fractions of 2.7 Gy, 5 times per week.
Main study endpoint: To decrease the five-year biochemical relapse rate with at least 10%.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
Patients will have to fill in a quality of life questionnaire before and after the radiotherapy treatments. The risk associated with the increased dose to the macroscopic tumour is an increase of toxicity and a reduction of quality of life.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
standard arm
The standard arm receives the current gold standard, namely 77Gy to the prostate in 35 fractions of 2.2 Gy, 5 times per week.
standard arm
The standard arm receives the current gold standard, namely 77Gy to the prostate in 35 fractions of 2.2 Gy, 5 times per week.
FLAME boost
In the experimental arm patients receive in addition to the current gold standard of 77 Gy to the prostate an integrated boost to the macroscopically visible tumour to reach a total dose of 95 Gy in 35 fractions of 2.7 Gy, 5 times per week.
FLAME boost
In the experimental arm patients receive in addition to the current gold standard of 77 Gy to the prostate an integrated boost to the macroscopically visible tumour to reach a total dose of 95 Gy in 35 fractions of 2.7 Gy, 5 times per week.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
FLAME boost
In the experimental arm patients receive in addition to the current gold standard of 77 Gy to the prostate an integrated boost to the macroscopically visible tumour to reach a total dose of 95 Gy in 35 fractions of 2.7 Gy, 5 times per week.
standard arm
The standard arm receives the current gold standard, namely 77Gy to the prostate in 35 fractions of 2.2 Gy, 5 times per week.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Intermediate and high risk prostate cancer, defined by Ash et al. 2000, namely:
* One or more factors: T2, or Gleasonscore \>7, or iPSA \> 10 ng/mL
* WHO score 0-2
Exclusion Criteria
* World Heath Organisation (WHO) score \>2
* International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) \>20
* If for any patient related reason an MRI cannot be performed
* If anticoagulation cannot be stopped temporarily regarding the implant of fiducial markers
* Previous prostatectomy (except from Trans Urethral Prostatectomy (TURP))
* TURP within 3 months from start treatment
* Previous pelvic irradiation
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
L.G.W. Kerkmeijer
L.G.W. Kerkmeijer, MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Linda Kerkmeijer, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UMC Utrecht
Uulke van der Heide, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
NKI
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospitals Leuven
Leuven, Vlaans-Brabant, Belgium
Radboud UMC
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
NKI-AvL
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kowalchuk RO, Kim H, Harmsen WS, Jeans EB, Morris LK, Mullikin TC, Miller RC, Wong WW, Vargas CE, Trifiletti DM, Phillips RM, Choo CR, Davis BJ, Beriwal S, Tendulkar RD, Stish BJ, Breen WG, Waddle MR. Cost effectiveness of treatment strategies for high risk prostate cancer. Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;128(21):3815-3823. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34450. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
Groen VH, Haustermans K, Pos FJ, Draulans C, Isebaert S, Monninkhof EM, Smeenk RJ, Kunze-Busch M, de Boer JCJ, van der Voort van Zijp J, Kerkmeijer LGW, van der Heide UA. Patterns of Failure Following External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without an Additional Focal Boost in the Randomized Controlled FLAME Trial for Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2022 Sep;82(3):252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.012. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
Kerkmeijer LGW, Groen VH, Pos FJ, Haustermans K, Monninkhof EM, Smeenk RJ, Kunze-Busch M, de Boer JCJ, van der Voort van Zijp J, van Vulpen M, Draulans C, van den Bergh L, Isebaert S, van der Heide UA. Focal Boost to the Intraprostatic Tumor in External Beam Radiotherapy for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: Results From the FLAME Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):787-796. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02873. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
van Schie MA, Janssen TM, Eekhout D, Walraven I, Pos FJ, de Ruiter P, Kotte ANTJ, Monninkhof EM, Kerkmeijer LGW, Draulans C, de Roover R, Haustermans K, Kunze-Busch M, Smeenk RJ, van der Heide UA. Knowledge-Based Assessment of Focal Dose Escalation Treatment Plans in Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Nov 15;108(4):1055-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.072. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
Monninkhof EM, van Loon JWL, van Vulpen M, Kerkmeijer LGW, Pos FJ, Haustermans K, van den Bergh L, Isebaert S, McColl GM, Smeenk RJ, Noteboom J, Walraven I, Peeters PHM, van der Heide UA. Standard whole prostate gland radiotherapy with and without lesion boost in prostate cancer: Toxicity in the FLAME randomized controlled trial. Radiother Oncol. 2018 Apr;127(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.12.022. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
Lips IM, van der Heide UA, Haustermans K, van Lin EN, Pos F, Franken SP, Kotte AN, van Gils CH, van Vulpen M. Single blind randomized phase III trial to investigate the benefit of a focal lesion ablative microboost in prostate cancer (FLAME-trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011 Dec 5;12:255. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-255.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Click here for more information about this study: FLAME 'Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial to Investigate the Benefit of a Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in patients treated with External Beam Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer'
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UMCU-FLAME
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.