FLAME: Investigate the Benefit of a Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in Prostate Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01168479

Last Updated: 2020-06-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

571 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: Dose escalation in external-beam irradiation has proven to benefit outcome in local prostate cancer. Randomized trials were performed up to doses of 78 Gy in 2 Gy fractions. Nevertheless, the five-year biochemical relapse rate still was approximately 35% in the high-dose arm. Therefore further dose escalation seems to be required. A feasibility study up to appr. 85 Gy on the entire prostate has already been performed and showed acceptable toxicity when combined with adequate position verification. Higher doses to the entire prostate are expected to increase severe toxicity. As local recurrences only occur at the site of the primary macroscopic tumour area the next step in increasing the dose should be an ablative boost to the macroscopic tumour alone, while electively irradiating the rest of the prostate to the current gold standard dose. Feasibility of this approach has been shown for an ablative dose of 95 Gy to the macroscopic tumour within the prostate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective:

* Primary study objective: To demonstrate the superiority of the ablative microboost dose schedule regarding 5-year biochemical no evidence of disease rate compared to the current standard of care.
* Secondary study objectives: Establish and compare the rates of treatment-related toxicity, quality of life and disease-free survival.

Study design: Single blind prospective randomized controlled phase III trial.

Study population: Patients with intermediate or high risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Intermediate or high risk is defined according to the Ash et al. 2000 criteria as:

* One (intermediate-risk) or more (high-risk) factors: T2, or Gleasonscore=7, or iPSA 10-20 ng/mL
* One or more (high-risk) factors: T3, or Gleasonscore \>7, or iPSA \>20 ng/mL

Intervention: The standard arm receives the current gold standard, namely 77Gy to the prostate in 35 fractions of 2.2 Gy, 5 times per week. In the experimental arm patients receive in addition to the current gold standard of 77 Gy to the prostate an integrated boost to the macroscopically visible tumour to reach a total dose of 95 Gy in 35 fractions of 2.7 Gy, 5 times per week.

Main study endpoint: To decrease the five-year biochemical relapse rate with at least 10%.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:

Patients will have to fill in a quality of life questionnaire before and after the radiotherapy treatments. The risk associated with the increased dose to the macroscopic tumour is an increase of toxicity and a reduction of quality of life.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy MRI

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

standard arm

The standard arm receives the current gold standard, namely 77Gy to the prostate in 35 fractions of 2.2 Gy, 5 times per week.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

standard arm

Intervention Type RADIATION

The standard arm receives the current gold standard, namely 77Gy to the prostate in 35 fractions of 2.2 Gy, 5 times per week.

FLAME boost

In the experimental arm patients receive in addition to the current gold standard of 77 Gy to the prostate an integrated boost to the macroscopically visible tumour to reach a total dose of 95 Gy in 35 fractions of 2.7 Gy, 5 times per week.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FLAME boost

Intervention Type RADIATION

In the experimental arm patients receive in addition to the current gold standard of 77 Gy to the prostate an integrated boost to the macroscopically visible tumour to reach a total dose of 95 Gy in 35 fractions of 2.7 Gy, 5 times per week.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FLAME boost

In the experimental arm patients receive in addition to the current gold standard of 77 Gy to the prostate an integrated boost to the macroscopically visible tumour to reach a total dose of 95 Gy in 35 fractions of 2.7 Gy, 5 times per week.

Intervention Type RADIATION

standard arm

The standard arm receives the current gold standard, namely 77Gy to the prostate in 35 fractions of 2.2 Gy, 5 times per week.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

FLAME normal dose

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Prostate cancer patients scheduled for external beam radiotherapy using IMRT and fiducial marker-based position verification
* Intermediate and high risk prostate cancer, defined by Ash et al. 2000, namely:

* One or more factors: T2, or Gleasonscore \>7, or iPSA \> 10 ng/mL
* WHO score 0-2

Exclusion Criteria

* Low risk prostate cancer, defined by Ash et al. 2000
* World Heath Organisation (WHO) score \>2
* International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) \>20
* If for any patient related reason an MRI cannot be performed
* If anticoagulation cannot be stopped temporarily regarding the implant of fiducial markers
* Previous prostatectomy (except from Trans Urethral Prostatectomy (TURP))
* TURP within 3 months from start treatment
* Previous pelvic irradiation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UMC Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

L.G.W. Kerkmeijer

L.G.W. Kerkmeijer, MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Linda Kerkmeijer, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UMC Utrecht

Uulke van der Heide, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

NKI

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospitals Leuven

Leuven, Vlaans-Brabant, Belgium

Site Status

Radboud UMC

Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

NKI-AvL

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

University Medical Center Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kowalchuk RO, Kim H, Harmsen WS, Jeans EB, Morris LK, Mullikin TC, Miller RC, Wong WW, Vargas CE, Trifiletti DM, Phillips RM, Choo CR, Davis BJ, Beriwal S, Tendulkar RD, Stish BJ, Breen WG, Waddle MR. Cost effectiveness of treatment strategies for high risk prostate cancer. Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;128(21):3815-3823. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34450. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36070558 (View on PubMed)

Groen VH, Haustermans K, Pos FJ, Draulans C, Isebaert S, Monninkhof EM, Smeenk RJ, Kunze-Busch M, de Boer JCJ, van der Voort van Zijp J, Kerkmeijer LGW, van der Heide UA. Patterns of Failure Following External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without an Additional Focal Boost in the Randomized Controlled FLAME Trial for Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2022 Sep;82(3):252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.012. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34953603 (View on PubMed)

Kerkmeijer LGW, Groen VH, Pos FJ, Haustermans K, Monninkhof EM, Smeenk RJ, Kunze-Busch M, de Boer JCJ, van der Voort van Zijp J, van Vulpen M, Draulans C, van den Bergh L, Isebaert S, van der Heide UA. Focal Boost to the Intraprostatic Tumor in External Beam Radiotherapy for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: Results From the FLAME Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):787-796. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02873. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33471548 (View on PubMed)

van Schie MA, Janssen TM, Eekhout D, Walraven I, Pos FJ, de Ruiter P, Kotte ANTJ, Monninkhof EM, Kerkmeijer LGW, Draulans C, de Roover R, Haustermans K, Kunze-Busch M, Smeenk RJ, van der Heide UA. Knowledge-Based Assessment of Focal Dose Escalation Treatment Plans in Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Nov 15;108(4):1055-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.072. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32629078 (View on PubMed)

Monninkhof EM, van Loon JWL, van Vulpen M, Kerkmeijer LGW, Pos FJ, Haustermans K, van den Bergh L, Isebaert S, McColl GM, Smeenk RJ, Noteboom J, Walraven I, Peeters PHM, van der Heide UA. Standard whole prostate gland radiotherapy with and without lesion boost in prostate cancer: Toxicity in the FLAME randomized controlled trial. Radiother Oncol. 2018 Apr;127(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.12.022. Epub 2018 Jan 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29336835 (View on PubMed)

Lips IM, van der Heide UA, Haustermans K, van Lin EN, Pos F, Franken SP, Kotte AN, van Gils CH, van Vulpen M. Single blind randomized phase III trial to investigate the benefit of a focal lesion ablative microboost in prostate cancer (FLAME-trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011 Dec 5;12:255. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-255.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22141598 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3286435/pdf/1745-6215-12-255.pdf

Click here for more information about this study: FLAME 'Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial to Investigate the Benefit of a Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in patients treated with External Beam Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer'

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UMCU-FLAME

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dose Escalation For INtraprostatic LEsions
NCT05851547 RECRUITING PHASE2