Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-11
2025-04-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This project has the goal to perform a feasibility study on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided focal laser ablation using the TRANBERG®\|Thermoguide Therapy System including TRANBERG®Thermoguide Workstation for MR thermometry developed by the company CLS AB.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MRI-guided Focal Laser Ablation
NCT04379362
MR-guided Focal Laser Ablation of the Prostate
NCT02200809
Focal Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Focal Low-Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT04045756
Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer
NCT04305925
MRI Guided Prostate Cancer Focal Laser Ablation
NCT03634579
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At present, treatment choice for prostate cancer patients at low or intermediate risk of disease progression lies between active surveillance (AS) and radical therapies, such as radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. For these patients, radical treatments have a comparable effectiveness, with a risk of specific death of less than 1% in 15 years. However, none is devised of consequences on the quality of life and can induce significant morbidities such as incontinence and impotence.
For this reason, innovative ablation techniques such as cryosurgery, high intensity focused ultrasound, photodynamic therapy and laser ablation therapy have emerged and are increasingly applied in clinical practice. These treatment methods aim for local destruction of cancerous cells using various sources of energy. The main advantage of preservation of healthy prostatic tissue is to reduce treatment-related complications and morbidity. Recent studies demonstrate that post-treatment prognosis is predominantly driven by the largest lesion with the highest grade, the so-called 'index lesion'. Treatment approaches which preserve parts of the prostatic gland are considered as focal therapy. Imaging plays an important role in detection, localization, targeting and monitoring of focal prostate cancer treatment. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is preferred in detecting and staging prostate cancer due to excellent soft tissue contrast and multiplanar anatomical imaging. It is also used to differentiate between post-treatment changes and potential recurrent or residual disease. As such, secondary treatment can be promptly established. More recently, mpMRI has gained acceptance in image-guided therapeutic settings since it offers real-time anatomical imaging in different planes and therefore improved treatment accuracy. Furthermore it can provide real-time temperature imaging.
Focal laser ablation (FLA) or laser-induced interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a relatively new technique which was originally developed to treat brain tumors. During this therapy, a laser fiber is positioned into the tumor under image guidance (ultrasound or MRI). When the position of the fiber is correct, laser light is delivered through the fiber and the temperature of the tissue around the tip of the fiber increases. When temperature increases above 60°C the tissue is irreversibly damaged and destroyed. The total ablation process takes about 2-3 minutes. MRI is perfectly suited to use for image guidance during FLA, because it can be used to localize the tumor, target it with probes, monitor and control the ablation procedure in real-time and to map tissue temperature.
Only a few studies on MRI-guided FLA are known. Lepor et al provided a pilot study of 25 patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer undergoing FLA. Three months after treatment, they showed no significant differences in functional outcome according to the SHIM (Sexual Health in Man) and AUASS (American Urological Association Symptom Score) questionnaires and no incontinence. Furthermore, 96% of the ablation zones targeted with biopsy three months after treatment, showed no histopathological prove of residual prostate cancer. A recent study by Walser et al. demonstrated a freedom of retreatment rate of 83% after a one year follow up in a group of 120 men with low- to intermediate risk disease that underwent transrectal FLA with no significant changes in quality of life or sexual and urinary function.
In Radboudumc we have several years of experience with MRI-guided focal laser ablation for prostate cancer treatment. At this moment separate systems are used for MR thermometry (IFE, Siemens) and laser energy control (Biolitec). CLS offers a dedicated system which integrates laser energy control with MR thermometry for ablation monitoring. Next to this, additional types of laser fibers are available that are thought to produce relatively larger, more adequate ablation zones (up to 3.0 x 2.0 cm) in comparison to current fibers. In potential, this will decrease the total procedure time because less ablations per lesion are needed and more patients will be eligible for FLA because larger tumors can be treated.
This project has the purpose to assess the feasibility of MRI-guided FLA treatment using the newly developed CLS system as well as its usability and safety.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MRI-guided focal laser ablation
Focal laser ablation
MRI-guided focal laser ablation for prostate cancer
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Focal laser ablation
MRI-guided focal laser ablation for prostate cancer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* maximum MRI visible lesion size is ≤ 20 mm large axis;
* age 45 to 76 years old;
* life expectancy at inclusion of more 10 years;
* diagnosis of prostate cancer confirmed by targeted biopsy;
* criteria of low and intermediate risk of progression and eligibility for focal therapy;
* clinical stage of maximum T2c
* maximum biopsy Gleason score of 4 + 3 on targeted biopsies
* serum prostate specific antigen \< 15 ng/ml
* patient accepting to be included in an active surveillance protocol at the end of the study, in accordance with the recommendations of good practice.
Exclusion Criteria
* history of radiation therapy or pelvic trauma; history of proved acute or chronic prostatitis;
* history of tumor in the preceding 5 years (excluded: non-metastatic basal cell skin cancer);
* severe urinary symptoms associated with benign hyperplasia of the prostate, and defined by an IPSS score \> 18;
* tumor with extra-capsular extension or invasion of the seminal vesicles;
* patients with \>2 lesions;
* impossibility to obtain a valid informed consent;
* patients unable to undergo MR imaging, including those with contra-indications;
* contra-indications to MR guided focal laser therapy (colitis ulcerosa, rectal pathology or abdomino perineal resection);
* metallic hip implant or any other metallic implant or device that distorts local magnetic field and compromises the quality of MR imaging;
* patients with evidence for nodal or metastatic disease;
* patients with an estimated Glomerular Filtration Ratio (eGFR) \< 40 mL/min/1.73 m2
45 Years
76 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jurgen Fütterer
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-13069
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.