Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-09-30
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion
NCT02981407
Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
NCT01504945
Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion
NCT02619136
REVEAL: Reduction of Infarct Expansion and Ventricular Remodeling With Erythropoietin After Large Myocardial Infarction
NCT00378352
Chronic, Low Dose Erythropoetin Beta in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
NCT00568542
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Liberal Transfusion Strategy
Patients randomly allocated to the liberal transfusion strategy receive one unit of packed red cells following randomization and receive enough blood to raise the hemoglobin concentration above 10 g/dL any time the hemoglobin concentration is detected to be below 10g/dL during the hospitalization for up to 30 days. Any transfusion following the initial unit of packed red cells must be preceded by blood test documenting a hemoglobin concentration below 10 g/dL.
Red blood cell transfusion
Liberal versus restrictive transfusion
Restrictive transfusion strategy
Receive a transfusion if they develop symptoms related to anemia. Transfusion is also permitted, but not required, in the absence of symptoms only if the hemoglobin concentration falls below 8 g/dL. Blood is administered one unit at a time and the presence of symptoms is reassessed. Only enough blood is given to relieve symptoms. If the transfusion is given because the hemoglobin concentration falls below 8 g/dL, then only enough blood is given to increase the hemoglobin concentration above 8 g/dL.
Symptoms of anemia that will be indications for transfusion are: 1) Definite angina requiring treatment with sublingual nitroglycerin or equivalent therapy. 2) Unexplained tachycardia or hypotension.
Red blood cell transfusion
Liberal versus restrictive transfusion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Red blood cell transfusion
Liberal versus restrictive transfusion
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* STEMI (ST segment elevated myocardial infarction)
* NSTEMI (Non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction)
* unstable angina
* stable coronary artery disease (undergoing cardiac catheterization during the index hospitalization);
* written informed consent has been obtained
* hemoglobin concentration less than 10 g/dL at the time of random allocation.
Exclusion Criteria
* retroperitoneal bleeding requiring surgery
* clinically important hemodynamic instability based on the judgment of the treating physician
* terminal malignancy or life expectancy less than 6 months
* scheduled for cardiac surgery within the next 30 days
* symptomatic at the time of randomization
* declines blood transfusion
* history of a clinically significant transfusion reaction
* inability to provide informed consent;
* enrolled in a competing study
* previous participation in the MINT trial
* any patient who in the judgment of the research team should not be enrolled in the trial. This would include, but not be limited to, factors such alcohol or drug dependence, or psychiatric illness.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
University of Pittsburgh
OTHER
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
OTHER
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Rhode Island Hospital
OTHER
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeffrey L Carson, MD
Jeffrey L Carson
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeffrey L Carson, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sheryl F Kelsey, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pittsburgh Data Coordinating Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Jack D. Weiler Hospital of Montefiore Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh Data Coordinating Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Carson JL, Brooks MM, Abbott JD, Chaitman B, Kelsey SF, Triulzi DJ, Srinivas V, Menegus MA, Marroquin OC, Rao SV, Noveck H, Passano E, Hardison RM, Smitherman T, Vagaonescu T, Wimmer NJ, Williams DO. Liberal versus restrictive transfusion thresholds for patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 2013 Jun;165(6):964-971.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Fergusson DA, Pagano MB, Roubinian NH, Turgeon AF, Valentine S, Trivella M, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Oct 20;10:CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub6.
Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Trivella M, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0220090205
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.