Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Jumping Mechanography

NCT ID: NCT01164670

Last Updated: 2015-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2011-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sarcopenia, the age-related decline in muscle mass and function (widely recognized as "frailty"), is increasingly being appreciated, primarily in the research environment. Interventions to prevent or treat sarcopenia can be anticipated to reduce falls, fractures and thereby to facilitate independence and improve quality of life for older adults. Unfortunately, there is no current consensus definition of sarcopenia, thereby impeding clinical recognition and treatment. It has been advocated that low appendicular (arm and leg) lean mass, as measured by DXA, be utilized as a clinical diagnostic tool to define sarcopenia. While such an approach is possible, however, muscle strength loss is more rapid than mass loss, indicating deterioration of muscle "quality." Muscle quality may be affected by changes at the neuromuscular, cellular or subcellular levels; parameters not detected by measuring mass alone. Clearly, tools evaluating muscle performance, not simply mass, are needed to optimally identify, and subsequently monitor, treatment of older adults with sarcopenia. While current tests of muscle power/function (e.g., chair-rising, self-selected gait velocity, etc.) do correlate with functional limitation in older adults, these existing tests have limitations in that they cannot be performed in all people, may have "yes/no" results rather than a continuous scale and may not be highly precise. Thus, improved muscle function assessment tools are needed, both clinically and in research venues. Jumping mechanography is very likely one such methodology.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sarcopenia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Men

Men over 70 years old.

No interventions assigned to this group

Women

Women over 70 years old.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ambulatory, community dwelling men and women age ≥ 70 years
* Able and willing to sign informed consent
* Able to stand without assistance

Exclusion Criteria

* Abnormalities on screening laboratory assessment deemed to be clinically significant by the study investigators
* History of myocardial infarction within the prior six months or ongoing angina
* History of injury or surgery within the prior six months which limits the ability to ambulate
* History of severe end-organ disease, e.g., cardiovascular, hepatic, hematologic, pulmonary, etc., which might limit the ability to complete this study
* History of malignancy with metastasis to the musculoskeletal system
* Neuromuscular disease impairing balance to the degree of not being able to stand without assistance
* BMD T-score of less than -3.5 at any measured site and a prior hip or vertebral fracture
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Neil Binkley, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Wisconsin Osteoporosis Clinical Center and Research Program

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-2010-0011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Postural Control in the Elderly
NCT00059501 COMPLETED
Motor Training for Fall Prevention
NCT01621958 COMPLETED NA
RIC (Remote Ischemic Conditioning) in Older Individuals
NCT06476288 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Enhanced Gait and Balance Training
NCT01896466 COMPLETED NA