Study of the Safety and Efficacy of TH-302 in Combination With Gemcitabine Compared With Gemcitabine Alone in Previously Untreated Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

NCT ID: NCT01144455

Last Updated: 2025-05-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

214 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-06-30

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine and TH-302 are effective in the treatment of subjects with first-line metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A hypoxic microenvironment is a characteristic of many solid tumors including pancreatic cancer. The presence of hypoxia in solid tumors is associated with a more malignant phenotype and resistance to chemotherapy. The hypoxia-activated prodrug, TH-302, is designed to selectively physiologically target the hypoxic microenvironment. There is an absence of therapeutic options for subjects with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine provides clinical benefit as a single agent, but median survival is about 6 months. Combining gemcitabine with TH-302 may enable the targeting of both the normoxic and hypoxic regions of pancreatic cancer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gemcitabine

Gemcitabine: 1,000 mg/m2 administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Gemzar (Gemcitabine)

Intervention Type DRUG

1,000 mg/m2 administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

240 mg/m2 TH-302 + Gemcitabine

TH-302: 240 mg/m2 administered IV over 30 minutes Day 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle

Gemcitabine: 1,000 mg/m2 administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gemzar (Gemcitabine)

Intervention Type DRUG

1,000 mg/m2 administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

TH-302

Intervention Type DRUG

240 mg/m2 of TH-302 will be administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of every 28-day cycle.

340 mg/m2 TH-302 + Gemcitabine

TH-302: 340 mg/m2 of TH-302 be administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of every 28-day cycle.

Gemcitabine: 1,000 mg/m2 administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Gemzar (Gemcitabine)

Intervention Type DRUG

1,000 mg/m2 administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

TH-302

Intervention Type DRUG

340 mg/m2 of TH-302 will be administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of every 28-day cycle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gemzar (Gemcitabine)

1,000 mg/m2 administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

TH-302

240 mg/m2 of TH-302 will be administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of every 28-day cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

TH-302

340 mg/m2 of TH-302 will be administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of every 28-day cycle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Gemcitabine HAP hypoxia activated prodrug HAP hypoxia activated prodrug

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. At least 18 years of age
2. Ability to understand the purposes and risks of the study and has signed a written informed consent form approved by the investigator's IRB/Ethics Committee
3. Locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma proven either by histology or cytology previously untreated with chemotherapy or systemic therapy other than:

* Radiosensitizing doses of 5-fluorouracil;
* Radiosensitizing doses of gemcitabine if relapse occurred at least 6 months after completion of gemcitabine;
* Neoadjuvant chemotherapy if relapse occurred at least 6 months after surgical resection;
* Adjuvant chemotherapy if relapse occurred at least 6 months after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy.
4. Measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria (at least one target lesion outside of previous radiation fields)
5. Documentation of disease progression since any prior therapy
6. ECOG performance status of 0 or 1
7. Life expectancy of at least 3 months
8. Acceptable liver function:

1. Bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 times upper limit of normal
2. AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) less than or equal to 2.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN); if liver metastases are present, then less than or equal to 5 times ULN is allowed
9. Acceptable renal function:

a. Serum creatinine less than or equal to ULN
10. Acceptable hematologic status (without hematologic support):

1. ANC greater than or equal to 1500 cells/μL
2. Platelet count greater than or equal to 100,000/μL
3. Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 9.0 g/dL
11. All women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test and male and female subjects must agree to use effective means of contraception (surgical sterilization or the use or barrier contraception with either a condom or diaphragm in conjunction with spermicidal gel or an IUD) with their partner from entry into the study through 6 months after the last dose

Exclusion Criteria

1. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV, cardiac disease, myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to Day 1, unstable arrhythmia or symptomatic peripheral arterial vascular disease
2. Known brain, leptomeningeal or epidural metastases (unless treated and well controlled for at least 3 months)
3. Previously treated malignancies, except for adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer, in situ cancer, or other cancer from which the subject has been disease-free for at least 5 years
4. Severe chronic obstructive or other pulmonary disease with hypoxemia (requires supplementary oxygen, symptoms due to hypoxemia or oxygen saturation \<90% by pulse oximetry after a 2 minute walk) or in the opinion of the investigator any physiological state likely to cause systemic or regional hypoxemia
5. Major surgery, other than diagnostic surgery, within 4 weeks prior to Day 1, without complete recovery
6. Active, uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or fungal infections, requiring systemic therapy
7. Treatment of pancreatic cancer with radiation therapy or surgery within 4 weeks prior to study entry
8. Prior therapy with an hypoxic cytotoxin
9. Subjects who participated in an investigational drug or device study within 28 days prior to study entry
10. Known active infection with HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis
11. Subjects who have exhibited allergic reactions to a structural compound, biological agent, or formulation (containing solutol and/or propylene glycol) similar to TH- 302
12. Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding
13. Concomitant disease or condition that could interfere with the conduct of the study, or that would, in the opinion of the investigator, pose an unacceptable risk to the subject in this study
14. Unwillingness or inability to comply with the study protocol for any reason
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

PRA Health Sciences

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

ImmunoGenesis

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mitesh Borad, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Shantan Reddy, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lousiana Health Sciences Center - Shreveport

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham Hematology and Oncology Associates, LLC

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Arizona

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HOPE

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

University of Arizona

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Saint Edward Mercy Medical Center

Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Disney Family Cancer Center

Burbank, California, United States

Site Status

Scripps Clinical Research Services

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

UCLA Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Palo Alto Medical Foundation

Mountain View, California, United States

Site Status

Los Palos Oncology and Hematology

Salinas, California, United States

Site Status

Sharp Memorial Hospital

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

California Pacific Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Hematology Oncology Associates, PC

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Florida Cancer Institute - New Hope

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala Oncology Center

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Martin Memorial Cancer Center

Stuart, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta Cancer Care

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Loyola University Medical Center

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Carle Cancer Center

Urbana, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Purchase Cancer Group

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Medical Oncology

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Cancer Institute

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

LSU Health Sciences Center - Feist Weiller Cancer Center

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Massachusetts Medical Center

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Virgina Piper Cancer Institute

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Hematology and Oncology Associates at BridgePoint

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Missouri Cancer Associates

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Montana Cancer Institute Foundation

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Oncology Hematology, P.C.

Hudson, New York, United States

Site Status

Cancer Care of Western North Carolina, PA

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Alamance Oncology Hematolgy Associates

Burlington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Carolina Oncology Specialists, PA

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Emerywood Hematology and Oncology

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Signal Point Clinical Research Center

Middletown, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region Oncology Hematology

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Northwest Cancer Specialists, P.C.

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Greater Philadelphia Cancer and Hematology Specialists, P.C.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Allegheny General Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Institute for Translational Oncology Research (ITOR)

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Div. of Medical Oncology

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology-Beaumont, Mamie McFaddin Ward Cancer Center

Beaumont, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology- Fort Worth - 12th Avenue

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology-Seton Williamson

Round Rock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology-Sherman

Sherman, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology-Wichita Falls Texoma Cancer Center

Wichita Falls, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fairfax Northern Virginia Hematology Oncology, PC

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Providence Everett Regional Medical Center, Cancer Research Dept.

Everett, Washington, United States

Site Status

Columbia Basin Hematology and Oncology0

Kennewick, Washington, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Borad MJ, Reddy SG, Bahary N, Uronis HE, Sigal D, Cohn AL, Schelman WR, Stephenson J Jr, Chiorean EG, Rosen PJ, Ulrich B, Dragovich T, Del Prete SA, Rarick M, Eng C, Kroll S, Ryan DP. Randomized Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine Plus TH-302 Versus Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 1;33(13):1475-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.7504. Epub 2014 Dec 15.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25512461 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.thresholdpharm.com/

Threshold Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TH-CR-404

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ZN-c3 + Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Cancer
NCT06015659 RECRUITING PHASE2