FAME II - Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Plus Optimal Medical Treatment (OMT) Verses OMT

NCT ID: NCT01132495

Last Updated: 2019-09-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1170 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall purpose of the FAME II trial is to compare the clinical outcomes, safety and cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI plus optimal medical treatment (OMT) versus OMT alone in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prospective, multi-center, multi-national, multi-continental, randomized clinical trial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort A: PCI plus OMT

PCI plus optimal medical treatment

Group Type OTHER

Stenting plus OMT

Intervention Type OTHER

FFR guided PCI, plus OMT

Cohort A: OMT alone

Optimal medical treatment alone

Group Type OTHER

OMT

Intervention Type OTHER

OMT alone

Cohort B

FFR \> 0.80; treatment according to local practice

Group Type OTHER

Standard of care

Intervention Type OTHER

FFR \> 0.80; treatment according to local practice

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stenting plus OMT

FFR guided PCI, plus OMT

Intervention Type OTHER

OMT

OMT alone

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard of care

FFR \> 0.80; treatment according to local practice

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with

* stable angina or,
* stabilized angina pectoris or,
* atypical chest pain or no chest pain but with documented silent ischemia
2. at least one stenosis is present of at least 50% in one major native epicardial coronary artery and supplying viable myocardium
3. Eligible for PCI
4. Signed written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients in whom the preferred treatment is CABG
2. Patients with left main coronary artery disease requiring revascularization
3. Patients with a recent STEMI or Non-STEMI
4. Prior CABG
5. Contra-indication to dual antiplatelet therapy
6. LVEF \< 30%
7. Severe LV hypertrophy
8. Planned need for concomitant cardiac surgery
9. Extremely tortuous or calcified coronary arteries precluding FFR measurements
10. A life expectancy of less than 2 years
11. Age under 21
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott Medical Devices

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bernard De Bruyne, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

O.L.Vrouwzlekenhuis Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Palo Alto

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford University Medical Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Atlanta VA Medical Center

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Tulane University

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Northeast Cardiology Associates

Bangor, Maine, United States

Site Status

OLV Ziekenhuis

Aalst, , Belgium

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Na Homolce Hospital

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Rigshospitalet University Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Bron, , France

Site Status

Heart Center Leipzig

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum der Universitat Munchen

München, , Germany

Site Status

Stadtisches Klinikum Munchen

München, , Germany

Site Status

Gottsegen Hungarian Institute of Cardiology

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria de Ferrara

Ferrara, , Italy

Site Status

Catharina-Ziekenhuis

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

St. Antonius Ziekenhuis

Nieuwegein, , Netherlands

Site Status

Isala Klinieken

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

Clinical Center Kragujevac

Kragujevac, , Serbia

Site Status

Orebro University Hospital

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Sodersjukhuset AB

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Royal Victoria Hospital

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Edinburgh Heart Centre

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Golden Jubilee National Hospital

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Kings College Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton University Hospitals NHS

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Canada Czechia Denmark France Germany Hungary Italy Netherlands Serbia Sweden United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nishi T, Piroth Z, De Bruyne B, Jagic N, Mobius-Winkler S, Kobayashi Y, Derimay F, Fournier S, Barbato E, Tonino P, Juni P, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF. Fractional Flow Reserve and Quality-of-Life Improvement After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. 2018 Oct 23;138(17):1797-1804. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035263.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30354650 (View on PubMed)

Xaplanteris P, Fournier S, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF, Barbato E, Tonino PAL, Engstrom T, Kaab S, Dambrink JH, Rioufol G, Toth GG, Piroth Z, Witt N, Frobert O, Kala P, Linke A, Jagic N, Mates M, Mavromatis K, Samady H, Irimpen A, Oldroyd K, Campo G, Rothenbuhler M, Juni P, De Bruyne B; FAME 2 Investigators. Five-Year Outcomes with PCI Guided by Fractional Flow Reserve. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):250-259. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803538. Epub 2018 May 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29785878 (View on PubMed)

Ciccarelli G, Barbato E, Toth GG, Gahl B, Xaplanteris P, Fournier S, Milkas A, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Pijls N, Tonino P, Fearon WF, Juni P, De Bruyne B. Angiography Versus Hemodynamics to Predict the Natural History of Coronary Stenoses: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation 2 Substudy. Circulation. 2018 Apr 3;137(14):1475-1485. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028782. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29162610 (View on PubMed)

Fearon WF, Nishi T, De Bruyne B, Boothroyd DB, Barbato E, Tonino P, Juni P, Pijls NHJ, Hlatky MA; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Three-Year Follow-Up of the FAME 2 Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation). Circulation. 2018 Jan 30;137(5):480-487. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031907. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29097450 (View on PubMed)

Barbato E, Toth GG, Johnson NP, Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Curzen N, Piroth Z, Rioufol G, Juni P, De Bruyne B. A Prospective Natural History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis Using Fractional Flow Reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Nov 29;68(21):2247-2255. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.055.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27884241 (View on PubMed)

De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, Barbato E, Tonino P, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winckler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd K, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Limacher A, Nuesch E, Juni P; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 25;371(13):1208-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408758. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25176289 (View on PubMed)

Fearon WF, Shilane D, Pijls NH, Boothroyd DB, Tonino PA, Barbato E, Juni P, De Bruyne B, Hlatky MA; Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2 (FAME 2) Investigators. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease and abnormal fractional flow reserve. Circulation. 2013 Sep 17;128(12):1335-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003059. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23946263 (View on PubMed)

De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Juni P, Fearon WF; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22924638 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0904

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CT-FFR-guided Strategy for In-stent Restenosis
NCT05611190 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
The Flash FFR Ⅱ Study
NCT04575207 RECRUITING NA