Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of a Test Mouthwash and Dentifrice Regimen in an In-situ Model of Dental Erosion (NCT NCT01128972)

NCT ID: NCT01128972

Last Updated: 2015-01-01

Results Overview

Enamel specimens were exposed to dietary erosive challenge and set of five indentations within each specimen was measured. Decrease in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates hardening of enamel surface. Enamel specimens were exposed to second erosion challenge to determine NER which compared the indentations values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), first erosive (E1) and second erosive challenge (E2). Percent NER was calculated by formula: \[(E1-E2)/ (E1-B)\]\*100. Smaller the negative NER, better is treatment regimen in imparting resistance to enamel.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

36 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, 4 hours post treatment in each treatment period

Results posted on

2015-01-01

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited at the clinical site.

Two days, prior to each treatment visit ,participants used a fluoride- free dentifrice twice daily to avoid any carry over effect.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Test Dentifrice + Test Mouth Rinse (MR)
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test sodium fluoride (NaF) dentifrice \[containing 1450 parts per million (ppm) fluoride (F) as NaF and potassium nitrate (KNO3)\] and test NaF (450ppmF) MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5 gram (g) test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of test MR for one minute.
Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF Dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water rinse. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create a dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Reference Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of reference sodium monofluorophosphate (NaMFP)/ NaF dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g reference dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create a dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create a dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Test MR
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and test MR containing NaF (450ppmF). The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create a dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of test MR for one minute.
Period I
STARTED
7
7
7
7
8
Period I
COMPLETED
7
7
7
7
8
Period I
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
Period II
STARTED
7
7
7
8
7
Period II
COMPLETED
7
7
7
8
7
Period II
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
Period III
STARTED
7
7
8
7
7
Period III
COMPLETED
7
7
8
7
7
Period III
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
Period IV
STARTED
7
8
7
7
7
Period IV
COMPLETED
7
8
7
7
7
Period IV
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
Period V
STARTED
8
7
7
7
7
Period V
COMPLETED
8
7
7
7
7
Period V
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Evaluation of a Test Mouthwash and Dentifrice Regimen in an In-situ Model of Dental Erosion

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
All Study Participants
n=36 Participants
All randomized participants were included for baseline evaluation.
Age, Continuous
37.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.90 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
36 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 4 hours post treatment in each treatment period

Population: Per protocol (PP) population: All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study treatments and had no major protocol deviations were included in analysis.

Enamel specimens were exposed to dietary erosive challenge and set of five indentations within each specimen was measured. Decrease in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates hardening of enamel surface. Enamel specimens were exposed to second erosion challenge to determine NER which compared the indentations values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), first erosive (E1) and second erosive challenge (E2). Percent NER was calculated by formula: \[(E1-E2)/ (E1-B)\]\*100. Smaller the negative NER, better is treatment regimen in imparting resistance to enamel.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test Dentifrice + Test MR
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF dentifrice \[containing 1450ppmF as NaF and KNO3\] and test NaF (450ppmF) MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create a dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of test MR for one minute.
Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF Dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water rinse. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Reference Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of reference NaMFP/ NaF dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g reference dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Adjusted Mean Percent Net Erosion Resistance (NER) of Enamel Specimens Exposed to Test Dentifrice + Test MR Relative to: 1) Test Dentifrice+ Sterile Water Rinse 2) Reference Dentifrice+ Sterile Water Rinse 3) Placebo Dentifrice+ Sterile Water Rinse
-2.88 Percent NER
Standard Error 2.155
-14.54 Percent NER
Standard Error 2.155
-29.48 Percent NER
Standard Error 2.155
-40.05 Percent NER
Standard Error 2.155

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 4 hours post treatment in each treatment period.

Population: PP population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study treatments and had no major protocol deviations were included in analysis.

SMH test was used to assess mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMH was determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents rehardening of enamel surface. Percent SMH recovery was calculated from indentation values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), after in-situ hardening (R) and after first erosive challenge (E1) using formula: \[(E1-R)/ (E1-B)\]\*100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test Dentifrice + Test MR
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF dentifrice \[containing 1450ppmF as NaF and KNO3\] and test NaF (450ppmF) MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create a dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of test MR for one minute.
Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF Dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water rinse. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Reference Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of reference NaMFP/ NaF dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g reference dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Adjusted Mean Percentage Surface Microhardness (SMH) Recovery of Enamel Specimens Exposed to Test Dentifrice + Test MR Relative to: 1)Test Dentifrice+Sterile Water Rinse 2)Reference Dentifrice+Sterile Water Rinse 3)Placebo Dentifrice+ Sterile Water Rinse
42.14 Percent SMH
Standard Error 1.399
38.02 Percent SMH
Standard Error 1.399
30.88 Percent SMH
Standard Error 1.399
30.57 Percent SMH
Standard Error 1.399

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 4 hours post treatment in each treatment period

Population: PP population: All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study treatments and had no major protocol deviations were included in analysis.

Enamel specimens were exposed to dietary erosive challenge and set of five indentations within each specimen was measured. Decrease in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates hardening of enamel surface. Enamel specimens were exposed to second erosion challenge to determine NER which compared the indentations values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), first erosive (E1) and second erosive challenge (E2). Percent NER was calculated by formula: \[(E1-E2)/ (E1-B)\]\*100. Smaller the negative NER, better is treatment regimen in imparting resistance to enamel.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test Dentifrice + Test MR
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF dentifrice \[containing 1450ppmF as NaF and KNO3\] and test NaF (450ppmF) MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create a dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of test MR for one minute.
Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF Dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water rinse. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Reference Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of reference NaMFP/ NaF dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g reference dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Adjusted Mean Percent NER of Enamel Specimens Exposed to a Treatment Regimen of Placebo Dentifrice + Test MR Relative to: 1) Test Dentifrice +Test MR 2) Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse 3) Reference Dentifrice +Sterile Water Rinse
-3.76 Percent NER
Standard Error 2.155
-2.88 Percent NER
Standard Error 2.155
-14.54 Percent NER
Standard Error 2.155
-29.48 Percent NER
Standard Error 2.155
-40.05 Percent NER
Standard Error 2.155

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 4 hours post treatment in each treatment period

Population: PP population: All randomized participants who received at least one dose of the study treatments and had no major protocol deviations were included in analysis.

SMH test was used to assess mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMH was determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents rehardening of enamel surface. Percent SMH recovery was calculated from indentation values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), after in-situ hardening (R) and after first erosive challenge (E1) using formula: \[(E1-R)/ (E1-B)\]\*100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test Dentifrice + Test MR
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF dentifrice \[containing 1450ppmF as NaF and KNO3\] and test NaF (450ppmF) MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create a dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of test MR for one minute.
Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF Dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water rinse. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Reference Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of reference NaMFP/ NaF dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g reference dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Adjusted Mean Percentage SMH Recovery of Enamel Specimens Exposed to Test Dentifrice + Test MR Relative to Following Treatment Regimens: 1) Test Dentifrice +Test MR 2) Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water 3) Reference Dentifrice +Sterile Water
37.75 Percent SMH
Standard Error 1.399
42.14 Percent SMH
Standard Error 1.399
38.02 Percent SMH
Standard Error 1.399
30.88 Percent SMH
Standard Error 1.399
30.57 Percent SMH
Standard Error 1.399

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 4 hours post treatment in each treatment period

Population: PP population: All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study treatments and had no major protocol deviations were included in analysis.

Enamel specimens were exposed to dietary erosive challenge and set of five indentations within each specimen was measured. Decrease in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates hardening of enamel surface. Enamel specimens were exposed to second erosion challenge to determine NER which compared the indentations values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), first erosive (E1) and second erosive challenge (E2). Percent NER was calculated by formula: \[(E1-E2)/ (E1-B)\]\*100. Smaller the negative NER, better is treatment regimen in imparting resistance to enamel.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test Dentifrice + Test MR
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF dentifrice \[containing 1450ppmF as NaF and KNO3\] and test NaF (450ppmF) MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create a dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of test MR for one minute.
Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF Dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water rinse. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Reference Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of reference NaMFP/ NaF dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g reference dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Adjusted Mean Percent NER of Enamel Specimens Exposed to Test Dentifrice +Sterile Water Rinse and Reference Dentifrice +Sterile Water Rinse
-2.88 Percent NER
Standard Error 2.155
-29.48 Percent NER
Standard Error 2.155

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 4 hours post treatment in each treatment period

Population: PP population: All randomized subjects who received at least one dose of the study treatments and had no major protocol deviations were included in analysis.

SMH test was used to assess mineralization status of enamel specimens using a Wilson 2100 Hardness tester. SMH was determined by measuring the length of the indentations of enamel specimens. An increase in the indentation length compared to the baseline indicates softening while decrease in the indentation length represents rehardening of enamel surface. Percent SMH recovery was calculated from indentation values of enamel specimens at baseline (B), after in-situ hardening (R) and after first erosive challenge (E1) using formula: \[(E1-R)/ (E1-B)\]\*100.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test Dentifrice + Test MR
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF dentifrice \[containing 1450ppmF as NaF and KNO3\] and test NaF (450ppmF) MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create a dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of test MR for one minute.
Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 Participants
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF Dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water rinse. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Reference Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of reference NaMFP/ NaF dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g reference dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Adjusted Mean Percent SMH Recovery of Enamel Specimens Exposed to Test Dentifrice +Sterile Water Rinse and Reference Dentifrice +Sterile Water Rinse
38.02 Percent SMH
Standard Error 1.399
30.88 Percent SMH
Standard Error 1.399

Adverse Events

Test Dentifrice + Test MR

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Reference Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo Dentifrice + Test MR

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Test Dentifrice + Test MR
n=36 participants at risk
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF dentifrice \[containing 1450ppmF as NaF and KNO3\] and test NaF (450ppmF) MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create a dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of test MR for one minute.
Test Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 participants at risk
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of test NaF Dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water rinse. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g test NaF dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Reference Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 participants at risk
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of reference NaMFP/ NaF dentifrice (1450ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g reference dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Test MR
n=36 participants at risk
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and test MR containing NaF (450ppmF). The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of test MR for one minute.
Placebo Dentifrice + Sterile Water Rinse
n=36 participants at risk
Participants were administered with treatment regimen comprising of placebo dentifrice (0ppmF) and placebo sterile water MR. The treatment regimen included application of 1.5g placebo dentifrice to a wet study toothbrush, brushing for 25 seconds to create dentifrice slurry, swished the slurry around the mouth for one minute. After one minute, participants expectorated the slurry and rinsed the mouth with tap water. One hour later, the participants rinsed the mouth with 15mL of sterile water rinse for one minute.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival Erythema
0.00%
0/36 • All AEs encountered or spontaneously reported following administration of any investigational product (including washout product), or for up to 5 days after the last administration of investigational product were recorded.
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • All AEs encountered or spontaneously reported following administration of any investigational product (including washout product), or for up to 5 days after the last administration of investigational product were recorded.
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • All AEs encountered or spontaneously reported following administration of any investigational product (including washout product), or for up to 5 days after the last administration of investigational product were recorded.
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • All AEs encountered or spontaneously reported following administration of any investigational product (including washout product), or for up to 5 days after the last administration of investigational product were recorded.
0.00%
0/36 • All AEs encountered or spontaneously reported following administration of any investigational product (including washout product), or for up to 5 days after the last administration of investigational product were recorded.

Additional Information

GSK Response Center

GlaxoSmithKline

Phone: 866-435-7343

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER