Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
NCT ID: NCT01124994
Last Updated: 2014-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-07-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CLE for Assessment of Neoplasia After Mucosal Ablation or Resection of Gastrointestinal Neoplasia
NCT01032044
Detection Of Neoplastic Tissue in Barrett's Esophagus With In vivO Probe-based Confocal Endomicroscopy
NCT00795184
Probe-based Volumetric Laser Endomicroscopy (pVLE) of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) Tissue in Patients With Barrett's Dysplasia
NCT02366039
pCLE in the Detection of Esophageal and Gastric Lesions and Intestinal Metaplasia or Dysplasia in Patients After Endoscopic Treatment of BORN
NCT02922049
Confocal Endomicroscopy for Barrett's Esophagus
NCT00487695
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Barrett's oesophagus is a common complication in patients suffering from gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). By means of chronic acid exposure the squamous epithelium of the oesophagus turns into a specialised columnar epithelium (SCE) with goblet cells. This histological change is prevalent in 1% of the normal population, and in up to 4, 9% of patients with reflux symptoms \[1\]. Although the Barrett's epithelium itself does not necessarily cause additional symptoms, its presence has to be diagnosed accurately, since affected patients are at increased risk of 0.5% per year of developing Barrett's associated cancer. An important prognostic factor is made up by the grade of dysplasia within the Barrett's mucosa. While most patients with no dysplasia or low-grade dysplasia remain clinically inconspicuous, the annual risk of developing cancer is up to 10% in those patients with high-grade dysplasia. If a Barrett's associated neoplastic lesion is found during endoscopy, Barrett's associated cancer is also present at another site of Barrett's oesophagus in up to 30% \[2\].
Consequently, they undergo periodically screening, consisting of endoscopy of the oesophagus with 4-quadrant biopsy every 2 to 3 cm or, in case of HGIN, local ablative therapy. The time period between controls depends on the grade of dysplasia diagnosed at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. If no dysplasia is present, the recommended follow-up period is less than 5 years. In case of low grade dysplasia endoscopic controls should be performed every year. Patients with high grade dysplasia should be examined every 3 months or prepared for a therapeutic intervention \[3\].
Early detection of Barrett's associated neoplasms, which can be histologically classified as adenocarcinoma, has important therapeutic implications. Cancerous infiltration of submucosal structures is associated with a significant risk of lymph node metastases and should be therefore treated by surgery. However, oesophagectomy has been shown to suffer from mortality rates between 3 and 12%, apart from substantial short- and long-term morbidity. Hence it is essential to detect early neoplastic lesions to have a broader range of therapeutic options at disposal. Patients with high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) or mucosal cancer are perfect candidates for curative endoscopic interventions like endoscopic ablation (with radiofrequency, for example), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The latter techniques are preferred as the resected specimens can be evaluated histologically, which provides definite information about the invasion depth and whether the resection borders are free from neoplastic tissue. Because of high rates of newly occurring neoplasia, remaining areas of Barrett's mucosa should be ablated or resected after histological confirmation of Barrett's oesophagus associated neoplasia \[3, 4\].
Trying to improve the diagnostic yield in the surveillance of patients with high risk for Barrett's oesophagus associated neoplasia, many new endoscopic inventions have been introduced into the management of Barrett's oesophagus in order to optimize the detection rates of early lesions. Among those are developments that improved the image quality of conventional white light endoscopes like high-resolution and high-definition endoscopes. Another approach, called chromoendoscopy, uses in vivo staining with methylene blue, indigo carmine or acetic acid. These dyes help to increase the tissue contrast which leads to improvement of detection rates comparable to high-resolution endoscopy. High contrast levels without staining agents can be achieved by the use of narrow band imaging (NBI). This technology additionally improves the visibility of capillaries, veins and other subtle tissue structures by the use of light with wavelength restricted to small bands in the blue and green spectrum. In a prospective randomized crossover study it showed equal results to high-resolution endoscopy plus indigo carmine \[4, 5\].
The newest development that has been introduced in the endoscopic management of the gastrointestinal tract is the so called confocal laser endomicroscope (CLE). Confocal microscopy was developed by Marvin Minsky in the late 1950s. Its principle is the microscopic scanning of focal points below the surface of an object. In comparison to conventional light microscopy it uses a special filter system to avoid image overlapping by surrounding tissue. In detail, a light source (normally a laser) is focused by a microscope objective lens to a diffraction limited spot on or inside the object. Light that is scattered, or fluorescence excited (achieved through fluorescein staining, for example) and emitted, at the focus in the sample will partially return back through the optics along the path from which it arrived. A beam-splitter placed into the path reflects the return light towards a detector. The optics will focus the light from the focal point in the specimen to its conjugate focus near the detector (hence the technology is termed "con-focal"). Here a spatial filter ("pinhole") is used to extinguish all light deriving from areas outside the focal point. Light reflections from the focal point itself will be forwarded to the detector which is connected to a computer system that digitalises the optical signal and creates the in vivo histological image \[6\].
Focussing on its clinical impact, confocal microscopy is the first technique to allow in vivo evaluation of tissue structures beneath their surface. Because of many breakthroughs in miniaturisation (mostly in the 1990s) this technology could be applied for intraluminal use in gastroenterology, integrated into a otherwise standard endoscope. It allows the in vivo histological visualisation of the upper 250 micrometers of all walls within the gastrointestinal tract, additionally to the normal function of white light endoscopy (provided by two separate screens on top of the workstation) \[6\].
Using CLE in a first clinical approach, Kiesslich et al. found high sensitivity and specificity rates for the detection of Barrett's oesophagus as well as for the prediction of Barrett's associated neoplastic changes - for both results CLE derived pictures were compared to conventional histology \[7\]. In a first prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, crossover trial Dunbar et al. proved these findings, as CLE-targeted biopsies had a higher diagnostic yield for Barrett's oesophagus associated neoplasia than standard endoscopy with 4-quadrant random biopsy \[8\].
Study Aims
In our clinical investigation we want to use confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) to accurately target Barrett's oesophagus associated neoplasia for subsequent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). To our knowledge this combination is only documented in one case report so far, describing the successful resection of a high-grade dysplastic Barrett-segment by the use of CLE-targeted EMR \[9\].
We want to show that CLE is suitable to detect the exact borders of high grade intraepithelial neoplasia. In our experience this feasibility cannot be reliably provided by any other established technique like chromoendoscopy or narrow band imaging, which often causes the need for re-treatment or even surgery.
To guarantee accurate documentation of mucosal CLE-mapping, the dimensions of the neoplastic lesion will be marked in terms of colour, photographed by simultaneously available white light endoscopy and finally evaluated by histological assessment of the specimen. Analysing the borders of the resected specimen in concern of tumour infiltration we will be able to calculate the en-bloc resection rate of CLE-targeted EMR.
In order to evaluate CLE concerning true negative results we will resect all remaining mucosal areas affected by Barrett within the second phase of the examination or (if the lesions are too big for one-time resection) within a second examination. Once again, CLE will be applied for all lesions to search for malignancies. If CLE detects further areas of neoplasia, CLE-mapping as mentioned above will be performed. All resected tissue parts will be evaluated histologically to check the results of CLE.
If CLE provides reliable data in our investigation this would be a big step on the way to establishing this new technology within the pre-interventional endoscopic management of patients suffering from Barrett's oesophagus. This could help to increase the en-bloc resection rate, decrease the amount of repetitive resections and consequentially improve the patients comfort.
Study Design
Prospective clinical trial without randomisation or blinding
Study Population
Patients referred to our department for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of Barrett's mucosa with high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) that has been detected during routine upper endoscopy or Barrett's surveillance endoscopy at our department or at another hospital.
Exclusion criteria:
* patients allergic to one of the drug components (including drugs used for conscious sedation like propofol or midazolam as well as fluorescein, the fluorescent dye used for CLE )
* patients presenting with contraindications to EMR (low platelet count, therapeutic anticoagulation, coagulation disorders)
* refusal to participate in the study
Methods
Our investigation will be performed at the Medical University of Vienna, department of medicine III, clinical division of gastroenterology and hepatology. Patient recruitment will start on the 1st of July 2010. The study will last for two years. The number of patients included within this period will be 40, based on the current number of EMR performed at our department for Barrett's with intraepithelial neoplasia.
All patients who fulfil the listed inclusion criteria, will receive the patient information form of this study together with the usual informed consent form of the respective endoscopic examination they are about to undergo. Patient information will be done at least 24 hrs. before the intervention, as practised at our unit. If the patient agrees to participate in the study he will be prepared for endoscopy with our confocal laser endomicroscope (Pentax EC3870K with the ISC-1000 confocal endomicroscopy processor - Pentax, Tokyo, Japan and Optiscan Pty Ltd, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia) by administration of intravenous propofol and/or midazolam as routinely used for conscious sedation during endoscopic procedures at our department. Additionally, 5-10 ml of a 10% solution of fluorescein sodium will be administered intravenously to enhance tissue fluorescence during endomicroscopy.
All drugs will be administered by medical specialists (such as the project director), assistant doctors (such as the project assistant) or registered nurses, as routinely practised at our institution.
Ethical implications
Confocal laser endomicroscopy is a safe new technique that has already been studied in clinical trials \[7, 8\]. Its safety is being guaranteed by the use of low intensity laser light that can at worst cause local bleaching of fluorescein containing cells, which is harmless, reversible and even used as diagnostic sign in experimental conditions \[6\].
Endoscopic mucosal resection is a well established technique for the minimal invasive, non-surgical curative treatment of intramucosal neoplasia. It has been studied in many clinical trials and is routinely performed at our unit for lesions in the oesoophagus, the stomach, duodenum and colo-rectum. Although severe complications like prolonged bleeding or perforations can potentially occur, the risk/benefit profile of this procedure is very good, compared to surgical treatments of neoplastic diseases of the oesophagus \[10\].
This study protocol has been submitted to the ethic commission of the Medical University of Vienna (EK-Nr. 697/2009) and was handled at the meeting on the 8th of September 2009. A positive vote was already delivered to our institution in written form.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mucosectomy
Patients in this arm are undergoing mucosctomy after previous confocal laser endomicroscopy.
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Confocal laser endomicroscopy will be used to target endoscopic mucosal resection of Barrett's oesophagus-associated neoplasia
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Confocal laser endomicroscopy will be used to target endoscopic mucosal resection of Barrett's oesophagus-associated neoplasia
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* patients presenting with contraindications to EMR (low platelet count, therapeutic anticoagulation, coagulation disorders)
* refusal to participate in the study
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Vienna
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Werner Dolak, MD
Prinicpal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andreas Puespoek, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Medical University of Vienna
Werner Dolak, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, , Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Holscher AH, Vallbohmer D, Bollschweiler E. Early Barrett's carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Dec;14(6):347-54. No abstract available.
Shaheen NJ, Richter JE. Barrett's oesophagus. Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):850-61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60487-6.
Spechler SJ. Dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: limitations of current management strategies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr;100(4):927-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41201.x.
Curvers WL, Bansal A, Sharma P, Bergman JJ. Endoscopic work-up of early Barrett's neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2008 Dec;40(12):1000-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103409. Epub 2008 Dec 8. No abstract available.
Kara MA, Peters FP, Rosmolen WD, Krishnadath KK, ten Kate FJ, Fockens P, Bergman JJ. High-resolution endoscopy plus chromoendoscopy or narrow-band imaging in Barrett's esophagus: a prospective randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 2005 Oct;37(10):929-36. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-870433.
Kiesslich R, Galle P, Neurath M. Atlas of endomicroscopy. Springer Medical Publishing. 2008
Kiesslich R, Gossner L, Goetz M, Dahlmann A, Vieth M, Stolte M, Hoffman A, Jung M, Nafe B, Galle PR, Neurath MF. In vivo histology of Barrett's esophagus and associated neoplasia by confocal laser endomicroscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Aug;4(8):979-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.05.010. Epub 2006 Jul 13.
Dunbar KB, Okolo P 3rd, Montgomery E, Canto MI. Confocal laser endomicroscopy in Barrett's esophagus and endoscopically inapparent Barrett's neoplasia: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Oct;70(4):645-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
Leung KK, Maru D, Abraham S, Hofstetter WL, Mehran R, Anandasabapathy S. Optical EMR: confocal endomicroscopy-targeted EMR of focal high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jan;69(1):170-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.1068. Epub 2008 Jun 25. No abstract available.
Ahmadi A, Draganov P. Endoscopic mucosal resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract. World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr 7;14(13):1984-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1984.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EK 697/2009
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.