Study to Compare the Virologic Efficacy in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and Neurocognitive State in Patients Infected by HIV-1 Long-term Treatment (> 3 Years) With Lopinavir / Ritonavir Monotherapy
NCT ID: NCT01116817
Last Updated: 2019-12-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-08-31
2011-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lopinavir/r Monotherapy as Maintenance Therapy After Long Term Viral Suppression
NCT00160849
Phase I/II, Open-Label Trial of Three Monoclonal Antibodies
NCT00219986
The Rilpivirine Cerebrospinal-fluid (CSF) Study
NCT01562886
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Rilpivarine-based Antiretroviral Tratment Regimen in HIV- Infected Patients With Liver Metabolic Disease Who Maintain Udetectable HIV Viral Load
NCT05898841
Lenacapavir Intensification to Disrupt HIV Reservoirs in Virologically Suppressed People With HIV Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy
NCT06819176
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
IP monotherapy as a strategy of simplification, after an induction period with standard triple therapy may be useful to minimize the risk of mitochondrial toxicity by NRTIs. Additionally, this strategy may be useful to improve treatment adherence, reduce costs and preserve future treatment options. In this sense, monotherapy with lopinavir / ritonavir (LPV / r) can be an effective option for the treatment of HIV-1 as a simplification strategy in routine clinical practice.3 OK04 study showed that in patients with sustained viral suppression simplified to monotherapy with LPV / r, rates of viral load \<50 copies / mL were similar to that patients continuing on standard triple therapy.4, 5 However, the virological efficacy of this strategy in the CSF compartments has been questioned by some authors. Like most protease inhibitors, lopinavir has a poor penetration in CSF. Thus, despite the concentration of lopinavir in CSF usually exceed the inhibitory concentration (IC50) of wild strains of HIV, it is possible that some patients may present lopinavir concentrations insufficient to achieve sustained suppression of viral replication in that compartment. In this sense, according to results from a recent study, up to 10% of patients treated with lopinavir / ritonavir monotherapy may present detectable levels of viral load in CSF while maintaining a CV \<50 copies / mL in plasma.9
On the other hand, about half of patients on antiretroviral therapy (HAART), despite achieving virologic control and the treatment is performed properly, have been neurocognitive dysfunction.10 This has been associated with multiple risk factors, including the presence of HIV in CSF.11 In fact, even though achieving undetectable viral load in plasma, up to 40% of patients on HAART show presence of virus in CSF.12 This also has been associated with a worse neurocognitive functioning. Therefore, the maximum control of viral replication is shown as a priority for the improvement of CNS dysfunction.
Based on the above, the objective of this study is to explore and evaluate the virological efficacy and safety at long-term neurocognitive level (\> 3 years) of monotherapy with lopinavir / ritonavir as a strategy to simplify antiretroviral therapy in patients infected by HIV.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LPV/r monotherapy 400/100 mg twice daily, orally administered
LPV/r monotherapy 400/100 mg twice daily, orally administered
Lumbar puncture (Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy)
Lumbar puncture at week 0
Lumbar puncture
LPV/r 400/100 mg twice daily + 2 NRTI, orally administered.
Lumbar puncture (HAART: Lopinavir/ritonavir + 2 NRTI)
Lumbar puncture at week 0
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lumbar puncture (Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy)
Lumbar puncture at week 0
Lumbar puncture (HAART: Lopinavir/ritonavir + 2 NRTI)
Lumbar puncture at week 0
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patients having a diagnosis of HIV infection, on stable treatment at least 3 years with LPV/r monotherapy, the inclusion of patients with at least 2 years will be permitted if it is not possible to include the expected number of patients.
2. Initiating monotherapy with lopinavir / ritonavir maintaining values of plasma HIV-1 RNA undetectable (cv \<50 copies / mL).
3. Maintain complete virologic suppression (CV \<50 copies / ml) in plasma for at least 3 years in treatment with LPV / r monotherapy. (Or 2 years, if not complied with the expected number of patients with at least 3 years with LPV / r monotherapy).
4. Good adherence to treatment (\> 90%).
5. Signing of informed consent.
Control group:
1. Patients having a diagnosis of HIV infection, on stable treatment at least 3 years with LPV/r 400/100 mg twice a day + 2 ITIAN, the inclusion of patients with at least 2 years will be permitted if it is not possible to include the expected number of patients.
2. Maintain complete virologic suppression (CV \<50 copies / ml) in plasma for at least 3 years in treatment with LPV / r monotherapy. (Or 2 years, if not complied with the expected number of patients with at least 3 years with LPV / r 400/100 mg 2 twice a day + 2 ITIAN).
3. Patients that can be put into pairs with the experimental ones following these characteristics: age, sex, presence of previous virologic failures, nadir CD4 + T lymphocytes and viral load \<50 copies / mL time prior to inclusion in the study. Patients having a diagnosis of HIV.
4. Good adherence to treatment (\> 90%).
5. Signing of informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
3. Therapies that include interferon, interleukin-2, cytotoxic chemotherapy or immunosuppressant at baseline.
4. Do not sign the informed consent.
5. Existence of any contraindication to the performance of lumbar puncture.
6. Presence of psychiatric disorders or being in psychopharmacological treatment.
7. Active alcohol consumption (\> 50 g / day) or illicit drugs.
8. Existence current or past opportunistic infection involving CNS functioning alteration.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades Infecciosas y la Promoción de la Salud y la Ciencia
OTHER
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LCR-MONOKAL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.