CSP #512 - Options in Management With Anti-Retrovirals

NCT ID: NCT00050089

Last Updated: 2015-04-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

368 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-01-31

Study Completion Date

2007-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This 'pragmatic' trial is a 2X2 open randomized study of patients in advanced HIV disease who have failed on conventional Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) regimens including all three classes of anti-HIV drugs. The first randomization will allocate patients to an intended 3-month antiretroviral drug-free period (ARDFP) or No ARDFP. The second randomization will allocate patients to Mega-ART (5+ drugs) or to Standard-ART (up to 4 drugs). The total study duration is 6.5 years with 5 years of intake and 1.5 year (minimum) of follow-up; median duration of patient follow-up is about 4 years. The target sample size is 390 patients and will provide 75% power to detect a 30% reduction in the hazard rate for the primary endpoint with mega-ART. Sixty-four sites will be participating in the trial--24 VA, 19 UK and 21 Canada.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Hypothesis:

Compared to patients in Standard Antiretroviral Therapy (ART), patients in Mega-ART assuming full compliance, will experience a 30% reduction in the hazard of reaching a clinical endpoint (AIDS event or death).

Secondary Hypotheses:

Time to development of a new, non-HIV related serious adverse event, health related quality of life, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 clinical or laboratory adverse events and changes in virological and immunological markers (CD4 cell count, viral load, resistance profiles) will vary between the different treatment strategies.

Interventions:

Eligible patients will be randomized to one of four treatment strategy arms:

1. No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) and Standard-ART
2. No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) and Mega-ART
3. Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (ARDFP) and Standard-ART
4. Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (ARDFP) and Mega-ART

Note: The 'first' randomization will be ARDFP vs No ARDFP. Patients randomized to No ARDFP will receive their 'second' randomization at the same time. However, patients randomized to an Antiretroviral Drug Free Period (ARDFP) will receive their 'second' randomized assignment (Standard or Mega-ART) at the end of the ARDFP.

Note: All Serious Adverse Events were coded using the MedDRA coding dictionary; other (not serious) Adverse Events were collected as part of the study but were not coded using MedDRA or any other standardized coding dictionary.

This is the first trial of a Tri-National collaboration effort between the UK MRC, the Canadian CIHR and the VA CSP. The OPTIMA Trial was reviewed and approved by CSEC on October 12, 2000. The pre-kickoff meeting was held on March 21, 2001 in Washington, DC. The VA study kickoff meeting was held in Dallas, TX on May 16-18, 2001 and the Canadian kickoff was held in Toronto on May 29, 2001. The UK will have individual site initiation. As of October 17, 2005 there have been 357 patients enrolled in OPTIMA, at 64 sites in the three countries (279 in the VA, 41 in Canada and 37 in the UK). To date there are 64 sites actively participating in the study (24 in the VA, 19 in UK and 21 in Canada). Last date of patient follow-up was December 31, 2007.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

AIDS HIV Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No ARDFP+Standard-ART

No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) and Standard-ART

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) vs ARDFP

Intervention Type OTHER

Continuation or interruption of ART treatment

Standard ART vs Mega ART

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard therapy vs Intensified therapy

No ARDFP+Mega-ART

No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) and Mega-ART

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) vs ARDFP

Intervention Type OTHER

Continuation or interruption of ART treatment

Standard ART vs Mega ART

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard therapy vs Intensified therapy

ARDFP+Standard-ART

Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (ARDFP) and Standard-ART

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) vs ARDFP

Intervention Type OTHER

Continuation or interruption of ART treatment

Standard ART vs Mega ART

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard therapy vs Intensified therapy

ARDFP+Mega-ART

Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (ARDFP) and Mega-ART

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) vs ARDFP

Intervention Type OTHER

Continuation or interruption of ART treatment

Standard ART vs Mega ART

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard therapy vs Intensified therapy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) vs ARDFP

Continuation or interruption of ART treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard ART vs Mega ART

Standard therapy vs Intensified therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) vs ARDFP

Continuation or interruption of ART treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard ART vs Mega ART

Standard therapy vs Intensified therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) vs ARDFP

Continuation or interruption of ART treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard ART vs Mega ART

Standard therapy vs Intensified therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

No Antiretroviral Drug-Free Period (No ARDFP) vs ARDFP

Continuation or interruption of ART treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard ART vs Mega ART

Standard therapy vs Intensified therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ability to provide informed consent
* Age of 18 years or more
* Serologic or virologic diagnosis of HIV infection
* Failure of at least two different multi-drug regimens that include drugs of all 3 classes that the patient can tolerate or laboratory evidence of resistance to drugs in each of the 3 classes
* Had at least 3 months of current ART and are still on treatment
* Two most recent results (which can include screening) on current ART of CD4 count less than or equal to 300 cells/mm3 or less than or equal to 15%, and a plasma viral load greater than or equal to 5,000 copies/ml (Roche Amplicor, v1.0), or greater than or equal to 2,500 copies/ml (by bDNA: Bayer v3.0/Chiron v3.0 or PCR:Roche Amplicor Monitor/COBAS v1.5)

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy, breast-feeding or planned pregnancy
* Likelihood of poor protocol follow-up or if Mega-Art is not feasible (due to significant intolerance of many ARV drugs)
* Serious, uncontrolled major opportunistic infection (OI) within 14 days of screening
* Likelihood of early death due to non-HIV disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical Research Council

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

US Department of Veterans Affairs

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sheldon Brown

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

VA Medical Center, Bronx

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Long Beach

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

VA Palo Alto Health Care System

Palo Alto, California, United States

Site Status

VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA

West Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

VA Connecticut Health Care System (West Haven)

West Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, DC

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bay Pines VAMC (111J)

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach VA Medical Center

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta VA Medical and Rehab Center, Decatur

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Jesse Brown VAMC (WestSide Division)

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital

Hines, Illinois, United States

Site Status

VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Jamaica Plain Campus

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange

East Orange, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New York Harbor HCS

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Bronx

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Durham

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Cleveland

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Portland

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

WJB Dorn Veterans Hospital, Columbia

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152)

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

VA South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

VA Medical Center, San Juan

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Puerto Rico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kyriakides TC, Babiker A, Singer J, Cameron W, Schechter MT, Holodniy M, Brown ST, Youle M, Gazzard B; OPTIMA Study Team. An open-label randomized clinical trial of novel therapeutic strategies for HIV-infected patients in whom antiretroviral therapy has failed: rationale and design of the OPTIMA Trial. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Aug;24(4):481-500. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00029-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12865041 (View on PubMed)

Bedimo R, Kyriakides T, Brown S, Weidler J, Lie Y, Coakley E, Holodniy M. Predictive value of HIV-1 replication capacity and phenotypic susceptibility scores in antiretroviral treatment-experienced patients. HIV Med. 2012 Jul;13(6):345-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2011.00981.x. Epub 2012 Jan 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22276745 (View on PubMed)

Kyriakides TC, Babiker A, Singer J, Piaseczny M, Russo J. Study conduct, monitoring and data management in a trinational trial: the OPTIMA model. Clin Trials. 2004;1(3):277-81. doi: 10.1191/1740774504cn022oa.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16279253 (View on PubMed)

Dau B, Ayers D, Singer J, Harrigan PR, Brown S, Kyriakides T, Cameron DW, Angus B, Holodniy M. Connection domain mutations in treatment-experienced patients in the OPTIMA trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Jun;54(2):160-6. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181cbd235.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20130473 (View on PubMed)

Bansback N, Sun H, Guh DP, Li X, Nosyk B, Griffin S, Barnett PG, Anis AH; OPTIMA TEAM. Impact of the recall period on measuring health utilities for acute events. Health Econ. 2008 Dec;17(12):1413-9. doi: 10.1002/hec.1351.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18404664 (View on PubMed)

Desai S, Kyriakides T, Holodniy M, Al-Salman J, Griffith B, Kozal M. Evolution of genotypic resistance algorithms and their impact on the interpretation of clinical trials: an OPTIMA trial substudy. HIV Clin Trials. 2007 Sep-Oct;8(5):293-302. doi: 10.1310/hct0805-293.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17956830 (View on PubMed)

Barnett PG, Chow A, Joyce VR, Bayoumi AM, Griffin SC, Nosyk B, Holodniy M, Brown ST, Sculpher M, Anis AH, Owens DK. Determinants of the cost of health services used by veterans with HIV. Med Care. 2011 Sep;49(9):848-56. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821b34c0.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21610542 (View on PubMed)

Nosyk B, Sun H, Bansback N, Guh DP, Li X, Barnett P, Bayoumi A, Griffin S, Joyce V, Holodniy M, Owens DK, Anis AH. The concurrent validity and responsiveness of the health utilities index (HUI 3) among patients with advanced HIV/AIDS. Qual Life Res. 2009 Sep;18(7):815-24. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9504-0. Epub 2009 Jun 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19562514 (View on PubMed)

Anis AH, Nosyk B, Sun H, Guh DP, Bansback N, Li X, Barnett PG, Joyce V, Swanson KM, Kyriakides TC, Holodniy M, Cameron DW, Brown ST; OPTIMA Team1. Quality of life of patients with advanced HIV/AIDS: measuring the impact of both AIDS-defining events and non-AIDS serious adverse events. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Aug 15;51(5):631-9. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a4f00d.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19430303 (View on PubMed)

Joyce VR, Barnett PG, Bayoumi AM, Griffin SC, Kyriakides TC, Yu W, Sundaram V, Holodniy M, Brown ST, Cameron W, Youle M, Sculpher M, Anis AH, Owens DK. Health-related quality of life in a randomized trial of antiretroviral therapy for advanced HIV disease. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Jan 1;50(1):27-36. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31818ce6f3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19295332 (View on PubMed)

Joyce VR, Barnett PG, Chow A, Bayoumi AM, Griffin SC, Sun H, Holodniy M, Brown ST, Kyriakides TC, Cameron DW, Youle M, Sculpher M, Anis AH, Owens DK. Effect of treatment interruption and intensification of antiretroviral therapy on health-related quality of life in patients with advanced HIV: a randomized, controlled trial. Med Decis Making. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):70-82. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10397615. Epub 2011 Mar 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21383086 (View on PubMed)

Holodniy M, Brown ST, Cameron DW, Kyriakides TC, Angus B, Babiker A, Singer J, Owens DK, Anis A, Goodall R, Hudson F, Piaseczny M, Russo J, Schechter M, Deyton L, Darbyshire J; OPTIMA Team. Results of antiretroviral treatment interruption and intensification in advanced multi-drug resistant HIV infection from the OPTIMA trial. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 31;6(3):e14764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014764.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21483491 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

512

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.