Integrated Dual Exercise and Lexiscan Positron Emission Tomography: IDEALPET
NCT ID: NCT01109992
Last Updated: 2018-10-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
43 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-02-28
2017-06-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Assess Regadenoson Administration Following an Inadequate Exercise Stress Test as Compared to Regadenoson Alone for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) Using Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)
NCT01618669
Multivariable Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease Using Cardiac CT Imaging
NCT00857792
A Study of Regadenoson in Subjects Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) Using Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Compared to Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)
NCT01334918
A Phase I Study in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate the Safety of CardioPET™ in Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
NCT00413647
Characterization of Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements Using Lexiscan®™ (Regadenoson) (Lexiscan®™) Rubidium-82 Myocardial Perfusion PET: A Temporal-Dependency Investigation
NCT01919450
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objectives of this study are to assess the tolerability and safety of combined symptom limited exercise stress test with Lexiscan (Lexercise PET) compared to Lexiscan alone (Lexiscan PET), to assess image quality of Lexercise compared to Lexiscan PET and to compare relative and absolute myocardial perfusion imaging with Lexercise compared to Lexiscan PET to identify CAD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Regadenoson (Lexiscan)
Regadenoson Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography
Regadenoson (Lexiscan)
Regadenoson Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography
Exercise + Regadenoson (Lexercise)
Exercise plus Regadenoson (Lexercise) Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography
Exercise plus Regadenoson (Lexercise)
Standard Bruce exercise stress test with regadenoson injection at maximal stress with Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Exercise plus Regadenoson (Lexercise)
Standard Bruce exercise stress test with regadenoson injection at maximal stress with Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography
Regadenoson (Lexiscan)
Regadenoson Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Clinically indicated N-13 ammonia PET study or ten healthy volunteers
* Known coronary artery disease (prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior coronary artery bypass surgery or Q wave MI on ECG) or intermediate to high pretest likelihood of CAD
* Able to exercise on a treadmill
* Able and willing to provide informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject requires emergent cardiac medical intervention or catheterization after the clinical study.
* Documented myocardial infarction (MI) ≤ 30 days prior to enrollment.
* History of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ≤ 4weeks prior to enrollment.
* History of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) ≤ 8 weeks prior to enrollment.
* History of heart transplantation.
* Allergy or intolerance to aminophylline or regadenoson
* Known severe or oxygen dependent bronchoconstrictive or bronchospastic lung disease \[e.g., asthma, wheezing, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), etc.\].
* Severe LV dysfunction, with ejection fraction of \< 30%
* Serious non-cardiac medical illness (e.g., disseminated malignancy, severe neurological dysfunction at time of baseline PET study) or a social situation which will preclude research study participation
* History of Seizures.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sharmila Dorbala, MBBS
Director, Nuclear Cardiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sharmila Dorbala, MBBS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Womens' Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chow BJ, Ananthasubramaniam K, dekemp RA, Dalipaj MM, Beanlands RS, Ruddy TD. Comparison of treadmill exercise versus dipyridamole stress with myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Apr 19;45(8):1227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.016.
Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R. New technology for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2007 Mar 20;115(11):1464-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.629808. No abstract available.
Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, Bateman TM, Messer JV, Berman DS, O'Gara PT, Carabello BA, Russell RO Jr, Cerqueira MD, St John Sutton MG, DeMaria AN, Udelson JE, Kennedy JW, Verani MS, Williams KA, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Alpert JS, Gregoratos G, Anderson JL, Hiratzka LF, Faxon DP, Hunt SA, Fuster V, Jacobs AK, Gibbons RJ, Russell RO; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American Society for Nuclear Cardiology. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). Circulation. 2003 Sep 16;108(11):1404-18. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080946.42225.4D. No abstract available.
Chow BJ, Beanlands RS, Lee A, DaSilva JN, deKemp RA, Alkahtani A, Ruddy TD. Treadmill exercise produces larger perfusion defects than dipyridamole stress N-13 ammonia positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jan 17;47(2):411-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.027.
Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 22;356(8):830-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra061889. No abstract available.
El Fakhri G, Sitek A, Guerin B, Kijewski MF, Di Carli MF, Moore SC. Quantitative dynamic cardiac 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses. J Nucl Med. 2005 Aug;46(8):1264-71.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BWH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.