Trial Outcomes & Findings for Gustin Gene Polymorphism and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) Taste (NCT NCT01097915)
NCT ID: NCT01097915
Last Updated: 2018-12-21
Results Overview
We examine associations between PROP status and the polymorphism rs2274333 (A/G) of the gene that codify for the salivary protein, gustin/CA6, Which has been suggested as a trophic factor that promotes growth and development of taste buds by acting on taste bud stem cells. The intensity of taste perception evoked by PROP and NaCl solutions was estimated to evaluate PROP taster status and molecular analysis of the gustin gene polymorphism was performed in individuals classified by PROP status using PCR techniques.
COMPLETED
170 participants
7 months
2018-12-21
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Super Tasters
Subjects highly sensitive to PROP
|
Medium Tasters
Subjects sensitive to PROP
|
Non Tasters
Subjects no sensitive to PROP
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
50
|
70
|
50
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
27
|
28
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
23
|
42
|
30
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Gustin Gene Polymorphism and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) Taste
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Super Tasters
n=50 Participants
Subjects highly sensitive to PROP
|
Medium Tasters
n=70 Participants
Subjects sensitive to PROP
|
Non Tasters
n=50 Participants
Subjects no sensitive to PROP
|
Total
n=170 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 • n=5 Participants
|
25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=7 Participants
|
25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6 • n=5 Participants
|
25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
109 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
70 participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
170 participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
healthy volunteers
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
70 participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
170 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 7 monthsWe examine associations between PROP status and the polymorphism rs2274333 (A/G) of the gene that codify for the salivary protein, gustin/CA6, Which has been suggested as a trophic factor that promotes growth and development of taste buds by acting on taste bud stem cells. The intensity of taste perception evoked by PROP and NaCl solutions was estimated to evaluate PROP taster status and molecular analysis of the gustin gene polymorphism was performed in individuals classified by PROP status using PCR techniques.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Super Tasters
n=27 Participants
Subjects highly sensitive to PROP
|
Medium Tasters
n=28 Participants
Subjects sensitive to PROP
|
Non Tasters
n=20 Participants
Subjects no sensitive to PROP
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Association Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP Sensitivity
Genotype AA
|
85.19 percentage of participants
|
50.99 percentage of participants
|
25.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Association Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP Sensitivity
Genotype AG
|
14.81 percentage of participants
|
35.71 percentage of participants
|
20 percentage of participants
|
|
Association Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP Sensitivity
Genotype GG
|
0 percentage of participants
|
14.29 percentage of participants
|
55 percentage of participants
|
|
Association Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP Sensitivity
Allele A
|
92.59 percentage of participants
|
67.86 percentage of participants
|
35 percentage of participants
|
|
Association Between Gustin Gene Polymorphism and PROP Sensitivity
Allele G
|
7.40 percentage of participants
|
32.14 percentage of participants
|
65 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 7 monthsSince the enzymatic function of gustin (CA6) depends upon the presence of Zn at its active site we measured the salivary zinc ion concentration in subjects classified as super-taster, medium taster and non-taster.The salivary Zn2+ concentration was measured with a QuantiChromTM zinc Assay kit (Gentaur, Brussels, Belgium) where the color intensity is directly proportional to the Zn2+ concentration in the sample.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Super Tasters
n=27 Participants
Subjects highly sensitive to PROP
|
Medium Tasters
n=28 Participants
Subjects sensitive to PROP
|
Non Tasters
n=20 Participants
Subjects no sensitive to PROP
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Association Between PROP Sensitivity and Saliva Zinc Ion Concentration
|
57.3 microg/dl
Standard Error 13
|
89.5 microg/dl
Standard Error 17.2
|
149.64 microg/dl
Standard Error 26.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 7 monthsSince individual ability to taste PROP may be correlated with BMI, we determined BMI (kg/m\^2) in subjects classified as super-taster, medium taster and non-taster.Weight (kg) and height (m) were recorded for each subject.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Super Tasters
n=27 Participants
Subjects highly sensitive to PROP
|
Medium Tasters
n=28 Participants
Subjects sensitive to PROP
|
Non Tasters
n=20 Participants
Subjects no sensitive to PROP
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Association Between PROP Sensitivity and BMI
|
20.3 Kg/m^2
Standard Error 0.48
|
20.76 Kg/m^2
Standard Error 0.58
|
22.58 Kg/m^2
Standard Error 0.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: Relationship between depolarization amplitude of signals and PROP taster status.
electrophysiological recordings from the tongue of 43 subjects classified for their taste sensitivity to 6-n- propyltiouracil (PROP) and genotyped for the specific receptor gene, TAS2R38. Density of fungiform papillae was also determined in each subject. The biopotentials were recorded by means of differential electrophysiological derivations between two silver electrodes, one in contact with the ventral surface of the tongue and one in perfect adhesion with the dorsal surface.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Super Tasters
n=15 Participants
Subjects highly sensitive to PROP
|
Medium Tasters
n=15 Participants
Subjects sensitive to PROP
|
Non Tasters
n=13 Participants
Subjects no sensitive to PROP
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Electrophysiological Recordings From the Tongue for the Objective Evaluation of Individual Variations of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) Sensitivity
|
97,08867 mV
Standard Error 6,538191
|
75,42000 mV
Standard Error 6,538191
|
48,48231 mV
Standard Error 7,023144
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Relationship between density of fungiform papillae and PROP taster status.
43 subjects were classified for their taste sensitivity to 6-n- propyltiouracil (PROP) and density of fungiform papillae was determined in each subject.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Super Tasters
n=15 Participants
Subjects highly sensitive to PROP
|
Medium Tasters
n=15 Participants
Subjects sensitive to PROP
|
Non Tasters
n=13 Participants
Subjects no sensitive to PROP
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Association Between PROP Sensitivity and Fungiform Papilla Density
|
51.66 No./cm2
Standard Error 5.25
|
33.49 No./cm2
Standard Error 5.26
|
18.53 No./cm2
Standard Error 7.023
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 monthsTaste perception was assessed by testing the ability to recognize, and the responsiveness to, representative solutions of the five taste qualities, also when supplemented with L-Arg, in subjects classified as PROP-tasters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Super Tasters
n=64 Participants
Subjects highly sensitive to PROP
|
Medium Tasters
n=64 Participants
Subjects sensitive to PROP
|
Non Tasters
Subjects no sensitive to PROP
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
Citric Acid · Undet Threshold
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
Citric Acid · Correct identification
|
49 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
MSG · Correct identification
|
26 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
sucrose · Undet Threshold
|
18 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
sucrose · Correct identification
|
40 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
sucrose · Incorrect teste response
|
6 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
NaCl · Undet Threshold
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
NaCl · Correct identification
|
52 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
NaCl · Incorrect teste response
|
11 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
Citric Acid · Incorrect teste response
|
10 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
caffeine · Undet Threshold
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
caffeine · Correct identification
|
56 Participants
|
56 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
caffeine · Incorrect teste response
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
MSG · Undet Threshold
|
7 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Taste Perception of Sweet, Sour, Salty, Bitter and Umami and Changes Due to L-Arginine Supplementation, as a Functin of Genetic Ability to Taste PROP.
MSG · Incorrect teste response
|
31 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Super Tasters
Medium Tasters
Non Tasters
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Iole Tomassini Barbarossa, Associate Professor
University of Cagliari
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place