Abnormal Structure and Bone Density in Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT01094899

Last Updated: 2021-09-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

79 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-03-10

Study Completion Date

2014-07-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Assumptions and Objectives: The working hypotheses are: 1 - subjects with type 1 diabetes and / or type 2, compared to subjects without diabetes are at risk for osteopenia and / or abnormal bone structure the foot (calcaneus and ankle) can lead to bone deformities, fractures and final stage of Charcot foot. These anomalies are favored by the presence of peripheral neuropathy and plasma levels of advanced glycation end products higher than in diabetic subjects without bone abnormalities.

The objectives of this research are to evaluate these anomalies quantitative and qualitative bone in the foot (calcaneus and ankle) through the use of MicroScanner. In parallel a whole body bone mineral density (BMD) and calcaneal ultrasound will be performed to measure bone mineral density as realized in clinical practice in a defined population of patients with type 1 or type 2. These bone abnormalities will be correlated with the presence of peripheral neuropathy and the rate of advanced glycation end products of proteins and reference to parameters of chronic inflammation and oxidative stress to better understand the pathophysiology and target a population at risk.

The importance of this study is paramount in the management of diabetic foot. Indeed for the moment we are dealing primarily the consequences of diabetes impact bone when bone deformities have appeared with their attendant disability and the risk of recurrent infections in areas of friction in this fragile environment. The ultimate goal is to target people with diabetes have abnormal bone subclinical and take care to avoid changes to bone deformities and find ways to treat them.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The population studies on subjects with type 1 and 2 diabetes have revealed a fracture risk multiplied by 4 to 12, especially at the shoulder, hip, ankle and foot, compared to a population of non-diabetic subjects matched for age and sex.

If osteopenia (decreased bone mineral density) is consistently associated with fracture risk in diabetic patients with type 1 diabetes type 2 often have a bone mineral density comparable or superior to non diabetes subjects.

The various causes mentioned in this alteration of the quantity and bone quality in the context of chronic hyperglycemia is a disturbance of the interaction between osteoblasts (cells forming bone) and osteoclasts (cells that resorb bone), partly mediated by the system RANK / RANK-L / osteoprotegerin with decreased bone formation and increased osteolyses. The peripherical neuropathy, the glycation proteins (modifications of proteins by addition of glucose) and the receptor of glycation proteins are directly involved.

At the foot, these changes in the bones (osteopenia and decreased bone quality) are responsible for deformations observed in some diabetic subjects, resulting in the formation of "Charcot foot" and the risk of sores and amputation as a major disability cause. Few studies have examined the abnormalities that we could find at the foot of the diabetic patients before the development of deformities observed in the Charcot foot. One study looked at bone mineral density measured by ultrasound at the Charcot foot and the contralateral foot in subjects with type 1 or type 2 compared to subjects with no diabetic Charcot foot. The authors found a decrease in bone density measured by ultrasound at the Charcot foot compared with the contralateral foot in subjects with type 1 and type 2. Bone density at the contralateral foot was reduced compared with control subjects with diabetes only in subjects with type 1 diabetes but not in patients with type 2 diabetes. The link with the peripheral neuropathy is not clear. A second study in women with type 1 diabetes in premenopausal also found a decrease in bone density at the calcaneus measured by ultrasound compared with women without diabetes. None of these studies focused on the local structure of the bone. Yet we may suspect that hyperglycemia, including glycation of proteins may cause structural changes in the bone of diabetic subjects. Previously, it was difficult to understand the structure of bone by non-invasive, the MicroScanner developed by the Scanco company can measure bone density and trabecular architecture of the wrist and ankle with a discrimination of 42 microns . He does a minimal radiation (3 microsV) and allows a resolution of 80 microns. It has already been used in osteopenic women and showed significant differences in terms of bone architecture between women with fracture and those who do not.

Assumptions and Objectives: The working hypotheses are: 1 - subjects with type 1 diabetes and / or type 2, compared to subjects without diabetes are at risk for osteopenia and / or abnormal bone structure the foot (calcaneus and ankle) can lead to bone deformities, fractures and final stage of Charcot foot. These anomalies are favored by the presence of peripheral neuropathy and plasma levels of advanced glycation end products higher than in diabetic subjects without bone abnormalities.

The objectives of this research are to evaluate these anomalies quantitative and qualitative bone in the foot (calcaneus and ankle) through the use of MicroScanner. In parallel a whole body BMD and calcaneal ultrasound will be performed to measure bone mineral density as realized in clinical practice in a defined population of patients with type 1 or type 2. These bone abnormalities will be correlated with the presence of peripheral neuropathy and the rate of advanced glycation end products of proteins and reference to parameters of chronic inflammation and oxidative stress to better understand the pathophysiology and target a population at risk.

The importance of this study is paramount in the management of diabetic foot. Indeed for the moment we are dealing primarily the consequences of diabetes impact bone when bone deformities have appeared with their attendant disability and the risk of recurrent infections in areas of friction in this fragile environment. The ultimate goal is to target people with diabetes have abnormal bone subclinical and take care to avoid changes to bone deformities and find ways to treat them.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 1 Diabetes Type 2 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Type 1 Diabetics without Neuropathy

Adult male with type 1 diabetes and without peripherical neuropathy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radiography

Intervention Type RADIATION

Radiography, microscanner, osteodensitometry

Urine and Blood sampling

Intervention Type OTHER

mainly dosage of bones metabolism

Echography

Intervention Type OTHER

body bones echography

Type 2 Diabetics without Neuropathy

Adult male with type 2 diabetes and without peripherical neuropathy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radiography

Intervention Type RADIATION

Radiography, microscanner, osteodensitometry

Urine and Blood sampling

Intervention Type OTHER

mainly dosage of bones metabolism

Echography

Intervention Type OTHER

body bones echography

Type 1 Diabetics with Neuropathy

Adult male with type 1 diabetes and with peripherical neuropathy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radiography

Intervention Type RADIATION

Radiography, microscanner, osteodensitometry

Urine and Blood sampling

Intervention Type OTHER

mainly dosage of bones metabolism

Echography

Intervention Type OTHER

body bones echography

Type 2 Diabetics with Neuropathy

Adult male with type 1 diabetes and with peripherical neuropathy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radiography

Intervention Type RADIATION

Radiography, microscanner, osteodensitometry

Urine and Blood sampling

Intervention Type OTHER

mainly dosage of bones metabolism

Echography

Intervention Type OTHER

body bones echography

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radiography

Radiography, microscanner, osteodensitometry

Intervention Type RADIATION

Urine and Blood sampling

mainly dosage of bones metabolism

Intervention Type OTHER

Echography

body bones echography

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult with type 1 or 2 diabetes with or without neuropathy

Exclusion Criteria

* Pathology affecting bone metabolism:

* abnormalities of phosphate metabolism proved biologically hepatic,
* chronic alcoholism
* renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \< 60 ml / min)
* hyperthyroidism,
* intoxication active smoking,
* occlusive arteritis of lower limbs (IPS \> IPS 1.2 or \< 0.9)
* Treatment affecting bone metabolism (corticosteroids or glitazones for over 3 months in the year or bisphosphonates within 6 months)
* Known HIV positive serology
* Progressive, inflammatory disease (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, bowel inflammatory)
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christian Boitard, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hotel Dieu

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-A00937-48

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

C08-25

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.