Study of the Sensitivity of Manual vs Electric Aspiration to Detect Completed Early Abortion

NCT ID: NCT01085825

Last Updated: 2017-02-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

With sensitive urine pregnancy tests, women are now able to confirm very early pregnancies. However, approximately one third of abortion facilities do not offer abortions at less than six weeks of pregnancy. Providers may be concerned that they will be unable to identify products of conception (POCs) in uterine aspirates after early abortion and about the time, cost and risk associated with following serum hCG levels when completed abortion cannot be confirmed by gross inspection. Many providers believe that manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) causes less destruction of pregnancy tissue and therefore may increase the likelihood of identifying POCs on gross inspection. No published reports specifically compare MVA to electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) for the detection of complete products of conception and none compare MVA and EVA at less than 6 weeks of pregnancy. We, the investigators, propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the sensitivity of MVA to EVA for the detection of completed abortion in 500 women with pregnancies of less than 6 weeks gestation at a large inner city family planning center. We will measure positive identification of POCs on gross inspection in patients subsequently shown to have completed abortions. We hypothesize that the rate of true positive detection of POCs will be higher in dilation and curettage (D\&C) using MVA than EVA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Induced Abortion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Manual Vacuum Aspiration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

D & C abortion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will be randomized to receive their abortion using either manual vacuum aspiration or electric vacuum aspiration.

Electric Vacuum Aspiration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

D & C abortion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will be randomized to receive their abortion using either manual vacuum aspiration or electric vacuum aspiration.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

D & C abortion

Participants will be randomized to receive their abortion using either manual vacuum aspiration or electric vacuum aspiration.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* gestational sac size \<12 mm or no visible sac (with positive pregnancy test) day of surgical abortion
* no medical contraindications to outpatient abortion at study site

Exclusion Criteria

* not able to consent
* suspected ectopic pregnancy (pelvic mass, unilateral pain, or detection on ultrasound), suspected molar pregnancy, or no sac and vaginal bleeding suspicious for completed spontaneous abortion
* failed medication abortion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Society of Family Planning

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Planned Parenthood of Greater New York

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Principal Investigator, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Planned Parenthood of Greater New York

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Planned Parenthood of New York City - Margaret Sanger Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dean G, Colarossi L, Porsch L, Betancourt G, Jacobs A, Paul ME. Manual compared with electric vacuum aspiration for abortion at less than 6 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;125(5):1121-1129. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000787.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25932839 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PPNYC 001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pelvic Examination in Pregnancy
NCT01570413 COMPLETED NA