Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1224 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-01-31
2008-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Interactive Preventive Health Record to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT01885351
Evaluating a Preference-based Intervention for Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT00810771
Educational Program to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Cluster Trial
NCT01805622
Randomized Controlled Trial of Tailored Interactive Multimedia to Reduce Colorectal Cancer Screening Disparities
NCT00786747
Computerized and Mailed Reminders in Increasing the Rate of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Adults With an Average Risk for Colorectal Cancer
NCT00355004
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1.1. Update literature reviews of CRCS adherence. 1.2. Conduct secondary analysis of relevant data from other projects. 1.3. Conduct focus groups with primary care patients to determine their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about CRCS and to gather data to use for development of the educational intervention.
Specific Aim 2: Develop a personal computer (PC)-based tailored interactive intervention based on the transtheoretical (stages of change) model to increase CRCS in accordance with American Cancer Society (ACS) CRCS guidelines.
Specific Aim 3: Evaluate the effectiveness of the PC-based tailored interactive intervention for increasing CRCS through a randomized controlled trial.
Specific Aim 4: Analyze the relationship between a number of predictor variables and CRCS completion in order to develop a more complete conceptual framework for understanding screening adherence.
Specific Aim 5: Conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of the PC-based tailored interactive intervention for increasing CRCS in a primary care setting.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PC-based tailored intervention
PC-based tailored intervention
Patients will receive a tailored interactive PC-based intervention at a freestanding kiosk.
Printed educational materials
Printed educational materials
Patients will receive generic printed educational materials about CRCS in the PEC when they arrive at the Main Campus for their appointment.
No patient intervention
Patients will not receive a patient-directed intervention.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PC-based tailored intervention
Patients will receive a tailored interactive PC-based intervention at a freestanding kiosk.
Printed educational materials
Patients will receive generic printed educational materials about CRCS in the PEC when they arrive at the Main Campus for their appointment.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must have been patients at KSC for at least one year prior to enrollment in the study
* Be 50 to 64 years of age
* Have had CRC or adenomatous polyps
* Must agree to schedule a routine physical examination with their primary care provider and to complete a baseline interview
Exclusion Criteria
50 Years
64 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sally Vernon
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sally W Vernon, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
McQueen A, Tiro JA, Vernon SW. Construct validity and invariance of four factors associated with colorectal cancer screening across gender, race, and prior screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Sep;17(9):2231-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0176.
Greisinger A, Hawley ST, Bettencourt JL, Perz CA, Vernon SW. Primary care patients' understanding of colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.10.001. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
Lairson DR, Chang YC, Bettencourt JL, Vernon SW, Greisinger A. Estimating development cost for a tailored interactive computer program to enhance colorectal cancer screening compliance. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):476-84. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2067. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HSC-SPH-01-084
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.