Biomarkers for Outcomes In Late-life Depression (BOLD)

NCT ID: NCT01082237

Last Updated: 2013-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-31

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric illness with high cost to society and individual patients. One reason for the high cost is that most patients endure lengthy and ultimately unsuccessful empiric antidepressant trials before a successful medication is identified by trial-and-error. Care would be improved if a biomarker could determine, early in the course of treatment, whether a particular antidepressant would likely lead to response, remission, or treatment failure. Physicians could rapidly change treatments to an antidepressant which the biomarker indicated would be likely to help the patient. We have identified quantitative electroencephalographic (QEEG) changes that emerge early in the course of treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) that appear to predict later response and remission in a general adult patient population. Demographic trends in the United States suggest that improved care for MDD will be essential for a growing number of elderly with late-life depression. While the consequences of prolonged trial-and-error periods to find a successful treatment are particularly inauspicious for elders with late-life depression, this patient group has not been included in the past studies which demonstrated the use of this biomarker approach in a general adult population. We propose a 12-week treatment trial to evaluate a practical biomarker for predicting outcome based on data from the first week of antidepressant treatment, with a focus only on depression in late life (age ≥65).

There are three study Hypothesis:

H1) ATR prediction of treatment outcome in older subjects will show \>70% accuracy.

H2) The predictive accuracy of the model will be enhanced by including clinical, socio-demographic, and genetic predictors.

H3) The accuracy of ATR prediction will not show a significant dependence on subject gender.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

escitalopram

All subjects will receive escitalopram (ESC), brand name Lexapro (Forest Laboratories, Inc., New York) throughout the study. Dosing will start at 5 mg/d, be titrated to 10 mg after 4 days, and continue at 10 mg/d thereafter; an additional dose titration to 20 mg will be pursued at week 8 for those not significantly better (\<50% improvement on IDS-30 at week 8 visit) and as tolerated.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Escitalopram

Intervention Type DRUG

Start at 5mg per day, after four days increase to 10mg per day for the duration of the study. 20 mg will be administered at week 8 if not significantly better.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Escitalopram

Start at 5mg per day, after four days increase to 10mg per day for the duration of the study. 20 mg will be administered at week 8 if not significantly better.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lexapro

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 62 years of age or older
* Meet the DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD based on Sheehan's Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), with a score of \> 28 on the 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Rated version (IDS-SR30)

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects will have no unstable medical illness that would prevent completion of participation in the trial, determined as needed from physical examination, ECG, laboratory safety tests, as well as a review of systems
* mentally or legally incapacitated, unable to give informed consent
* meets DSM-IV criteria for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, obsessive-compulsive disorder, any cognitive disorder, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, or major depression with psychotic features
* MMSE (Folstein et al., 1975) score ≤ 24
* evidence of drug dependency or substance abuse within the preceding nine months
* stable and in remission on current psychotropic medication(s)
* any ECT within the past six months
* failure to tolerate ESC or treatment failure with an adequate trial of ESC in the current episode
* ESC would be contraindicated (e.g., hyponatremia with a prior SSRI)
* treatment with fluoxetine or an MAOI within the past four weeks
* any medical illness severe enough to significantly affect brain function or to interfere with interpretation of study results
* history of seizures, brain surgery, skull fracture, significant head trauma, or abnormal EEG
* psychiatric hospitalization indicated (e.g., imminent danger to self or others)
* initial QEEG recording is contaminated with artifact so that determination of the biomarker is precluded
* use of medications known to affect brain function (e.g., antidepressants, anticonvulsants/mood stabilizers, anticholinergics, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines - same list as in BRITE-MD)
Minimum Eligible Age

62 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ian A. Cook, M.D.

Ian A. Cook, M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ian A Cook, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, Los Angeles

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCLA Semel Institute

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1RC1MH088438

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1RC1MH088438

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neurotrophic Factors and Depression
NCT00812994 COMPLETED PHASE4