Study Comparing Conventional and Fast Track Multi-Discipline Treatment Interventions for Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01080547

Last Updated: 2017-04-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

374 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A new notion"Fast Track Multi-Discipline Treatment" for colorectal cancer is thought with several benefits such as shorter hospitalization stay and less costs. This randomized study aims to compare the differences between conventional and Fast Track Multi-Discipline Treatment for colorectal cancer in hospitalization day, complications, costs and quality of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Laparoscopic Surgery, Fast Track Treatment and XELOX Chemotherapy have been introduced in the treatment of colorectal cancer. All of these procedures are contributed to reduce the hospitalization stay. However, the most economical mode for combination of these procedures is still unclear. This is a randomized controlled study, a new notion"Fast Track Multi-Discipline Treatment" is proposed, which is the combination of the Laparoscopic Surgery, Fast track perioperative treatment during perioperative period and XELOX Chemotherapy. The purpose of this study is to compare the Fast Track Multi-Discipline Treatment with the conventional treatment(Open Surgery with conventional treatment during perioperative period and mFolfox6 chemotherapy) for colorectal cancer on several aspects like the average hospitalization day, complications, costs and quality of life.The focus of the study will be to investigate whether the Fast Track Multi-Discipline Treatment reduces hospital stay with similar complications compared with conventional perioperative treatment. Moreover, the trial will clarify whether laparoscopic surgery is essential for Fast Track Multi-Discipline Treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Length of Stay Complications Adverse Drug Event Quality of Life Hospital Costs

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Treatment (Laparoscopic)

Randomized group of patients receiving laparoscopic colectomy with conventional perioperative treatment and mFolfox6 chemotherapy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer using STORZ laparoscope

mFolfox6 chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Conventional (mFolfox6) chemotherapy

Conventional Perioperative Treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional treatment during perioperation period

FTMD Treatment (Laparoscopic)

Randomized group of patients receiving laparoscopic colectomy with Fast Track Multi-Displine(FTMD)treatment and XELOX chemotherapy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer using STORZ laparoscope

XELOX Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

XELOX chemotherapy

Fast Track Perioperative Treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Fast track treatment during perioperation period

Conventional Treatment(Open Surgery)

Randomized group of patients receiving open colectomy with conventional perioperative treatment and mFolfox6 chemotherapy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

mFolfox6 chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Conventional (mFolfox6) chemotherapy

Conventional Perioperative Treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional treatment during perioperation period

Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open surgery for colorectal cancer using conventional methods

FTMD Treatment(Open Surgery)

Randomized group of patients receiving open colectomy with Fast Track Multi-Displine(FTMD) treatment and XELOX chemotherapy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

XELOX Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

XELOX chemotherapy

Fast Track Perioperative Treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Fast track treatment during perioperation period

Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open surgery for colorectal cancer using conventional methods

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer using STORZ laparoscope

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

XELOX Chemotherapy

XELOX chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

mFolfox6 chemotherapy

Conventional (mFolfox6) chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Fast Track Perioperative Treatment

Fast track treatment during perioperation period

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional Perioperative Treatment

Conventional treatment during perioperation period

Intervention Type OTHER

Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Open surgery for colorectal cancer using conventional methods

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

STORZ laparoscope Capecitabine Oxaliplatin Oxaliplatin Fast track surgery Traditional Perioperative Treatment Traditional open surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with pathologically confirmed colorectal cancer
2. Signed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Tumor can be resected by endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)
2. History of malignancy
3. Bowel obstruction or intestinal perforation
4. Evidence of metastasis by physical examination, chest roentgenogram and computed tomography of liver and pelvis
5. Acute diseases and acute attack of chronic diseases
6. Psychiatric history
7. Deformity of spine
8. ASA score≥Ⅳ
9. Mid-low rectal cancer
10. Pregnant woman
11. Needing to use Chinese traditional patent drug
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zhejiang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ding Ke-Feng

Professor of SAHZU

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ke-Feng Ding, PhD/MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

The Second Affiliated Hospital, and The Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University College of Medicine.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University College of Medicine

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

People's Hospital of Shaoxing

Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Li J, Kong XX, Zhou JJ, Song YM, Huang XF, Li GH, Ying XJ, Dai XY, Lu M, Jiang K, Fu DL, Li XL, He JJ, Wang JW, Sun LF, Xu D, Xu JY, Chen M, Tian Y, Li JS, Yan M, Yuan Y, Ding KF. Fast-track multidisciplinary treatment versus conventional treatment for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled study. BMC Cancer. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6188-x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31647032 (View on PubMed)

Xu D, Li J, Song Y, Zhou J, Sun F, Wang J, Duan Y, Hu Y, Liu Y, Wang X, Sun L, Wu L, Ding K. Laparoscopic surgery contributes more to nutritional and immunologic recovery than fast-track care in colorectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb 4;13:18. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0445-5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25649903 (View on PubMed)

Zhou JJ, Li J, Ying XJ, Song YM, Chen R, Chen G, Yan M, Ding KF. Fast track multi-discipline treatment (FTMDT trial) versus conventional treatment in colorectal cancer--the design of a prospective randomized controlled study. BMC Cancer. 2011 Nov 24;11:494. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-494.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22111914 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009C13017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.