Correlation Between Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in Argentina

NCT ID: NCT01080014

Last Updated: 2013-10-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

252 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This observational study is being conducted to evaluate the usefulness of the MSFC and its relationship with EDSS scores in subjects with MS in Argentina.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This observational, open-label study is being conducted to correlate change in EDSS score with the change in MSFC scores at the end of a 2-year follow-up period for subjects with MS in Argentina. Measurement of disability is an indispensable parameter in assessing the efficacy of experimental therapeutic agents in MS as well as in trying to determine possible individual evolution of the disease. Clinical scales are being used as primary or secondary outcome measures for recording disease progression in clinical trials. Kurtzke's EDSS is still used as a gold standard for measuring impairment and disability in MS. The MSFC is an examination-based quantitative scoring of neurological impairment. This study aims to establish a correlation between the usefulness of both scales.

OBJECTIVES

Primary Objective:

* To evaluate the change in MSFC score with change in EDSS scores at end of 2 year follow-up period for subjects with MS in Argentina

Secondary Objectives:

* To evaluate the cross-sectional correlations in MSFC score at baseline and at 24 months with EDSS score at baseline and at 24 months
* To describe the MSFC score for MS phenotype in this population
* To evaluate the predictive validity of MSFC score of a subsequent EDSS change in a subgroup of MS patients in Argentina

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects with definite diagnosis of MS, according to McDonald's criteria
* All clinical types: relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), primary progressive MS (PPMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Stable disease course without any relapse for at least the previous 3 months
* Subjects treated or not with disease modifying drugs
* Ages between 18 and 65 years and is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements
* Subject has a stable residence with no planned move during the entire investigation period

Exclusion Criteria

* Life expectancy less than 5 years at admission
* Diagnosis of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS)
* Other clinical conditions that mimic MS
* Psychiatric diseases
* Alcohol or drug abuse
* Pregnancy
* The subject is unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol or scheduled appointments
* Subject is unable to understand the language in which the approved informed consent is written
* The subject is a study site employee, or an immediate family member (i.e., spouse, parent, child, sibling) of a study site employee, involved in conduct of this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr. Roberto Rosa, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

PhD Neurologist, Unaffiliated

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr. Roberto Rosa

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EMR 200077_502

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id