Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
162 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-10-27
2017-04-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Secondary outcomes: to evaluate differences in the mean number of clinic visits/antepartum tests avoided with IOL, to compare the differences in utilization of inpatient resources (mean duration of inpatient stay, mean duration of labor), and to evaluate the effect of IOL on the risk of urinary/anal incontinence and sexual dysfunction as analyzed using previously validated measurements. We will evaluate differences in the rate of cervical change once active labor is diagnosed, and the time from completion of active labor, defined as complete dilation and complete effacement, to the delivery of fetus (definition of second stage of active labor). Furthermore, other secondary outcomes to be evaluated include comparisons between IOL and EM in regards to the occurence of chorioamnionitis, stillbirth, operative vaginal delivery, and meconium stained amniotic fluid. An evaluation of the predictive value of cervical length and Bishop score for vaginal delivery will also be examined.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management
NCT01990612
Labor Induction With a Combined Method (Pharmacologic and Mechanical): Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03928600
Labor Induction in Low-risk Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation to Reduce Cesarean: A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management in France (FRENCH-ARRIVE)
NCT04799912
Management of Labor in Patients With Previous Cesarian Section
NCT02196103
The Efficacy of Early Amniotomy for Induction of Labor
NCT00133016
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A routine 6-8 week immediate postpartum and 1 year follow-up examinations will be scheduled for all subjects following delivery. In addition to the routine examinations, all subject evaluations during these visits will include completion of a standard urinary/rectal incontinence/sexual function.
Study data will be entered into a password protected Excel file on a DoD government computer accessible only to study investigators and a clinical research nurse. Withdrawal from the study will be voluntary and results will be analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis.
Data analysis will focus on the primary outcome: to evaluate the effect of elective induction of labor, at 39 weeks gestation, on cesarean delivery rates in nulliparous women compared to expectant (typical) management. Also evaluation of secondary outcomes will include determination of the predictive value of cervical length and Bishop score for successful vaginal delivery; the risk of urinary/anal incontinence and sexual dysfunction with labor induction compared to spontaneous labor; number of clinic visits/antepartum tests avoided with elective induction compared with potential increased utilization of inpatient resources; evaluation of the labor curve with induction compared to spontaneous labor. Other secondary outcomes to be evaluated include comparisons between IOL and EM in regards to the rate of chorioamnionitis, rate of stillbirth, rate of operative vaginal delivery, and rate of meconium stained amniotic fluid. Students t-test will be used to compare continuous variables and the Chi-square test will be used to compare proportions between the groups. Analysis is by intent-to-treat with a p-value of less than 0.05 considered significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Expectant management (EM) arm
Standard of care: routine clinic appointments until they deliver, fetal heart rate and contraction monitoring during their 41st week if not delivered. Also if they have not gone into labor the subjects will be scheduled for an induction by 42 weeks.
No interventions assigned to this group
Induction of Labor (IOL) arm
Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks.
Induction of Labor
If cervical foley bulb placement is possible, the foley bulb will remain in place until either spontaneously removed or after 12 hrs, whichever is earlier. If placement is not possible, cervical ripening with misoprostol 25 micrograms (mcg) per vagina every 4 hrs (max of 4 total doses) will be initiated. Cervical examination will occur every 4 hr. Repeat doses of misoprostol will be given only if foley bulb placement is not possible and/or if palpably firm uterine contractions are less than 6 in 10 min in consecutive 10 min intervals. Once placement of a cervical foley bulb can be performed, oxytocin administration will begin at 2 mIU/min and increasing by 2 mIU/min every 20 min to ensure adequate contractions (maximum oxytocin infusion rate 36 mIU/min). Adequate contractions will be defined as 7 contractions in 15 min in consecutive 15 min intervals that palpate moderate to firm. Oxytocin infusion will begin not earlier than 4 hrs after the last misoprostol dose (if given).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Induction of Labor
If cervical foley bulb placement is possible, the foley bulb will remain in place until either spontaneously removed or after 12 hrs, whichever is earlier. If placement is not possible, cervical ripening with misoprostol 25 micrograms (mcg) per vagina every 4 hrs (max of 4 total doses) will be initiated. Cervical examination will occur every 4 hr. Repeat doses of misoprostol will be given only if foley bulb placement is not possible and/or if palpably firm uterine contractions are less than 6 in 10 min in consecutive 10 min intervals. Once placement of a cervical foley bulb can be performed, oxytocin administration will begin at 2 mIU/min and increasing by 2 mIU/min every 20 min to ensure adequate contractions (maximum oxytocin infusion rate 36 mIU/min). Adequate contractions will be defined as 7 contractions in 15 min in consecutive 15 min intervals that palpate moderate to firm. Oxytocin infusion will begin not earlier than 4 hrs after the last misoprostol dose (if given).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who meet dating criteria as outlined above, and
* Patients who have a Bishop score of ≤ 5.
Exclusion Criteria
* Scheduled induction of labor for medical indications, and/or
* Failure to meet dating criteria above, Bishop score of \> 5.
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Madigan Army Medical Center
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sandra Smith
Maternal Fetal Medicine Fellow
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nathaniel R Miller, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Madigan Army Medical Center
Peter Nielsen, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Madigan Army Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Madigan Army Medical Center
Tacoma, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
de Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.
Middleton P, Shepherd E, Morris J, Crowther CA, Gomersall JC. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 15;7(7):CD004945. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub5.
Miller NR, Cypher RL, Foglia LM, Pates JA, Nielsen PE. Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1258-1264. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001154.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
210013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.