Effects of Physical Therapy on Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01074957

Last Updated: 2010-02-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-11-30

Study Completion Date

2009-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Although respiratory physiotherapy has been used in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, evidence lacks concerning its effectiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of three physiotherapeutic protocols used to recover respiratory volumes in the postoperative period.

Methods: Thirty five patients were randomly allocated into three groups. Exercise group (E) was oriented to progressive mobilization. Incentive Spirometry group (IS) performed deep breathings using VoldyneTM, while Breath-Stacking group (BS) performed successive inspiratory efforts using a facial mask adapted to an unidirectional valve. Both BS and IS also performed progressive mobilization. Forced spirometry was carried out in the pre-operative period and from the first to the fifth postoperative day. Statistical analysis used student t-test and ANOVA, and the differences were considered significant when p\<0.05.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a prospective, controlled and randomized clinical trial, conducted with patients undergoing cardiac surgery at Hospital de Força Aérea do Galeão (HFAG - Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil). According to Helsinki declaration, the protocol was approved by UNISUAM Ethics Committee (process: 15/2007) and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All patients at the HFAG, who were scheduled for cardiac surgery between November 2007 and February 2009 were eligible to participate in this study.

Patients were not included if any of the following criteria was present: informed consent could not be obtained, they could not perform the preoperative tests, cognitive impairments to perform the IS, intolerance to the use of BS mask. Exclusion criteria included: hemodynamic complications (intraoperative myocardial infarction, major blood loss, marked hypotension, reduced cardiac output requiring the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump or extraordinary use of medications) and intubation period longer than 72 hours following arrival in the intensive care unit. In all patients the surgical procedure was through a median sternotomy, and the postoperative routine was the same, including optimal treatment for pain control. A verbal pain score was obtained using a visual analog scale and all patients initiated the physiotherapeutic treatment at the first postoperative day, following extubation. Demographic data, clinical history and preoperative risk factors were recorded.

In the preoperative period all patients were instructed about the importance of early mobilization and excessive bronchial secretion removal. Patients were taught huffing (forced expiration while the glottis is opened), supported cough (with patient's hands placed on the sternotomy incision) and mobilization, including active limb exercises, sit out of bed and deambulation (starting on the third postoperative day). Then, they were randomly allocated into three groups. Exercise group (E) performed only the procedures described above. Incentive Spirometry group (IS) was oriented to take a deep breathing through Voldyne 5000TM (Sherwood Medical; St Loius, MO, USA) from Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) to Total Lung Capacity (TLC). Breath-Stacking group (BS) performed inspiratory efforts using a facial mask adapted to an unidirectional valve. Since the mask was set to allow only inspiration (the expiratory branch was occluded), the patient carried through successive inspiratory efforts for a period of 20 seconds. Then, the expiratory branch was released allowing exhalation. These three treatments were applied for five days, with three series of five maneuvers twice a day. Patients management was similar among groups in terms of assessment, mobilization protocol and cough orientation.

For safety purposes, vital signs and oxygen saturation (SpO2) were monitored throughout the interventions. SpO2 was measured continuously for seven minutes using a portable pulse oximeter (Model 2500A, Nonin Medical INC; Plymouth, USA) with patient breathing room air. After seven minutes the most consistent value for 30 seconds was recorded and previous oxygen therapy was reinitiated. If during the assessment, patient's SpO2 dropped to below 85%, oxygen was recommenced and it was registered.

All procedures were performed under the supervision of an experienced physical therapist. Forced spirometry was carried out in the preoperative period and from the first to the fifth postoperative day, using a Pony Fx® spirometer (Cosmed; Rome, Italy). A Wright® ventilometer (British Oxygen Company; London, England) was properly attached to Voldyne and to Breath-Stacking mask, allowing to measure the Inspiratory Capacity (IC) during the procedures.

Postoperative risk was evaluated by means of Torrington Scale, using clinical and functional data.

Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was done using Sigma Stat 3.1 (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA, USA). Data are presented as average and standard error of the mean. They presented normal distributions (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with Lilliefors' correction) and homogeneous variances (Levene median test). Comparisons of FVC between IS, BS and E were done with ANOVA, followed by Tukey test whenever multiple comparisons were required. Student's t-test was used to compare IC between IS and BS. The significance level was always set at 5%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulmonary Volumes After Cardiac Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Incentive Spirometry

Incentive Spirometry group (IS) was oriented to take a deep breathing through Voldyne 5000TM (Sherwood Medical; St Loius, MO, USA) from Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) to Total Lung Capacity (TLC).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Incentive Spirometry

Intervention Type DEVICE

Incentive Spirometry (IS) has been used extensively in postoperative period and consists of spontaneous deep breaths through a device which provides a visual feedback to maintain a maximum insuflation

Exercise group

Patients were taught huffing (forced expiration while the glottis is opened), supported cough (with patient's hands placed on the sternotomy incision) and mobilization, including active limb exercises, sit out of bed and deambulation (starting on the third postoperative day).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients were taught huffing (forced expiration while the glottis is opened), supported cough (with patient's hands placed on the sternotomy incision) and mobilization, including active limb exercises, sit out of bed and deambulation (starting on the third postoperative day).

Breath-Stacking

Breath-Stacking group (BS) performed successive inspiratory efforts using a facial mask adapted to an unidirectional valve

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Breath-Stacking Technique

Intervention Type DEVICE

An one-way valve device to promote the summation of successive inspiratory volumes while expiration was avoided

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Incentive Spirometry

Incentive Spirometry (IS) has been used extensively in postoperative period and consists of spontaneous deep breaths through a device which provides a visual feedback to maintain a maximum insuflation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Breath-Stacking Technique

An one-way valve device to promote the summation of successive inspiratory volumes while expiration was avoided

Intervention Type DEVICE

Exercise

Patients were taught huffing (forced expiration while the glottis is opened), supported cough (with patient's hands placed on the sternotomy incision) and mobilization, including active limb exercises, sit out of bed and deambulation (starting on the third postoperative day).

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Voldyne One-way inspiratory valve Early mobilization

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients were not included if any of the following criteria was present:

* Informed consent could not be obtained
* Could not perform the preoperative tests
* Cognitive impairments to perform the IS
* Intolerance to the use of BS mask

Exclusion Criteria

* Hemodynamic complications (intraoperative myocardial infarction
* Major blood loss
* Marked hypotension
* Reduced cardiac output requiring the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump or extraordinary use of medications) and intubation period longer than 72 hours following arrival in the intensive care unit
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cristina M Dias, DSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Mestrado UNISUAM

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

UNISUAM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.