Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study for Monthly Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-Epoetin Beta Treatment in Patients With Chronic Renal Anaemia (NCT NCT01066000)
NCT ID: NCT01066000
Last Updated: 2017-11-13
Results Overview
The proportion of participants with their mean haemoglobin (Hb) concentration (g/dL) within the target range during the efficacy evaluation period was assessed. The target range is the reference Hb not \>12 g/dL and not \< 10 g/dL.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
33 participants
Up to Week 24
2017-11-13
Participant Flow
The study was conducted at 10 sites in the Indonesia and the study period was from 05 October 2009 to 12 September 2011.
Of the 85 screened participants 52 were screening failure due to abnormal haemoglobin concentration and 33 were enrolled in the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Mircera
Eligible participants received methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (Mircera) intravenously (IV), once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 microgram (mcg) which was based on the Epoetin dose of\<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 International units \[IU\]/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
33
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Mircera
Eligible participants received methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (Mircera) intravenously (IV), once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 microgram (mcg) which was based on the Epoetin dose of\<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 International units \[IU\]/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study for Monthly Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-Epoetin Beta Treatment in Patients With Chronic Renal Anaemia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Mircera
n=33 Participants
Eligible participants received Mircera IV, once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 mcg which was based on the Epoetin dose of \<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 IU/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 24Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population was defined as all participants who entered study and took at least one dose of study drug. The ITT and safety population were identical. At Week 24, data of 24 participants were included whereas 9 participants were excluded from the analysis as they discontinued the study before analysis of this outcome measure.
The proportion of participants with their mean haemoglobin (Hb) concentration (g/dL) within the target range during the efficacy evaluation period was assessed. The target range is the reference Hb not \>12 g/dL and not \< 10 g/dL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mircera
n=24 Participants
Eligible participants received Mircera IV, once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 mcg which was based on the Epoetin dose of \<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 IU/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants Maintaining Average Haemoglobin During the Efficacy Evaluation Period Within the Target Range (10-12 g/dl)
|
45.8 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 28Population: Safety population included all participants who entered into the study and took at least one dose of study drug.The ITT and safety population were identical. Data of maximum number of participants (33 participants) available at the time of analysis were analysed and reported.
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that occurred during the course of the trial after study treatment had started. An adverse event was therefore any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A Serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect. The AEs were assessed from baseline to every visit throughout the treatment, post study drug discontinuation, and follow up period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mircera
n=33 Participants
Eligible participants received Mircera IV, once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 mcg which was based on the Epoetin dose of \<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 IU/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Number of participants serious AE
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Total number of participants with at least one AE
|
15 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 24Population: ITT population was defined as all participants who entered study and took at least one dose of study drug. The ITT and safety population were identical. At Week 24, data of 24 participants were included whereas 9 participants were excluded from the analysis as they discontinued the study before analysis of this outcome measure.
The mean haemoglobin (Hb) concentration (g/dL) change from the baseline (Week 0) till efficacy evaluation period (EEP) was assessed and reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mircera
n=24 Participants
Eligible participants received Mircera IV, once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 mcg which was based on the Epoetin dose of \<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 IU/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Screening Period and Efficacy Evaluation Period
At baseline
|
10.89 g/dL
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
|
Mean Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Screening Period and Efficacy Evaluation Period
Mean change at EEP
|
0.04 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 24Population: ITT population was defined as all participants who entered study and took at least one dose of study drug. The ITT and safety population were identical. At Week 24, data of 24 participants were included whereas 9 participants were excluded from the analysis as they discontinued the study before analysis of this outcome measure.
The proportion of participants maintaining haemoglobin concentration within the haemoglobin range 10-12g/dL throughout the efficacy evaluation period (EEP) was assessed and reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mircera
n=24 Participants
Eligible participants received Mircera IV, once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 mcg which was based on the Epoetin dose of \<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 IU/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Proportion of Participants Maintaining Haemoglobin Concentration Within the Haemoglobin Range 10-12g/dL Throughout the Efficacy Evaluation Period
Participants maintaining Hb >10 g/dl
|
62.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Proportion of Participants Maintaining Haemoglobin Concentration Within the Haemoglobin Range 10-12g/dL Throughout the Efficacy Evaluation Period
Participants maintaining Hb within 10-12 g/dl
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 24Population: ITT population was defined as all participants who entered study and took at least one dose of study drug. The ITT and safety population were identical. At Week 24, data of 24 participants were included whereas 9 participants were excluded from the analysis as they discontinued the study before analysis of this outcome measure.
Mean time spent in the haemoglobin range 10 - 12 g/dL during the efficacy evaluation period (EEP) was assessed and reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mircera
n=24 Participants
Eligible participants received Mircera IV, once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 mcg which was based on the Epoetin dose of \<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 IU/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Time Spent by Participants in the Haemoglobin Range of 10 - 12 g/dL During the Efficacy Evaluation Period
|
3.92 Weeks
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 24Population: ITT population was defined as all participants who entered study and took at least one dose of study drug. The ITT and safety population were identical. At Week 24, data of 24 participants were included whereas 9 participants were excluded from the analysis as they discontinued the study before analysis of this outcome measure.
Mean number of months per participant requiring dose adjustment during the dose titration and evaluation periods was assessed and reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mircera
n=24 Participants
Eligible participants received Mircera IV, once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 mcg which was based on the Epoetin dose of \<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 IU/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Number of Months Per Participant Requiring Dose Adjustment During the Dose Titration and Evaluation Periods
|
1 Months
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, and Week 20Population: ITT population was defined as all participants who entered into study and took at least one dose of study drug. The ITT and safety population were identical. Data of maximum number of participants (24 participants) available at the time of analysis were analysed and 9 participants discontinued the study before this analysis.
Mean monthly dose of methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta during the dose titration and evaluation periods was assessed and reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mircera
n=24 Participants
Eligible participants received Mircera IV, once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 mcg which was based on the Epoetin dose of \<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 IU/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Monthly Dose of Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-epoetin Beta During the Dose Titration and Evaluation Periods
At Baseline
|
97.9 μg/month
Standard Deviation 14.6
|
|
Mean Monthly Dose of Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-epoetin Beta During the Dose Titration and Evaluation Periods
At Week 4
|
103.1 μg/month
Standard Deviation 19.9
|
|
Mean Monthly Dose of Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-epoetin Beta During the Dose Titration and Evaluation Periods
At Week 8
|
107.3 μg/month
Standard Deviation 37.9
|
|
Mean Monthly Dose of Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-epoetin Beta During the Dose Titration and Evaluation Periods
At Week 12
|
119 μg/month
Standard Deviation 43.8
|
|
Mean Monthly Dose of Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-epoetin Beta During the Dose Titration and Evaluation Periods
At Week 16
|
114.6 μg/month
Standard Deviation 53.6
|
|
Mean Monthly Dose of Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-epoetin Beta During the Dose Titration and Evaluation Periods
At Week 20
|
120.8 μg/month
Standard Deviation 73.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 28Population: Safety population included all participants who entered into the study and took at least one dose of study drug.The ITT and safety population were identical. Data of maximum number of participants (33 participants) available at the time of analysis were analysed and reported.
A marked laboratory abnormality is defined as above and/or below the normal range of a laboratory parameter which was considered to be potentially clinically relevant. The number of participants with marked laboratory abnormality are presented. Marked laboratory abnormalities were analyzed according to the Roche specified limits for the following reference range: Haemoglobin (Hb) (11.7-17.3 g/dL), Haematocrit (Hct) (35-47%), White blood cells (WBC) (3.6-11.0 10\^3/µL), Red blood cells (RBC) (3.8- 5.9 10\^6/µL), MCV (80-100 fL) Platelets (150-440 10\^3/µL), Iron (37-158 µg/dL), Ferritin (10-365 ng/mL), Transferrin (170-340 mg/dL), TIBC (250-450 µg/dL), TSAT (15-50%), Albumin (3.4-4.8 g/dL), hs-CRP (\<= 10.000 mg/dL), Potassium (3.5-5.1 mmol/L), and Phosphorus (2.7-4.5 mg/dL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Mircera
n=33 Participants
Eligible participants received Mircera IV, once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 mcg which was based on the Epoetin dose of \<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 IU/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, Potassium-High
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, Hb-Low
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, Hct-Low
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, WBC-Low
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, WBC-High
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, MCV-Low
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, MCV- High
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, RBC-Low
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, RBC -High
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, Platelets-Low
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, Iron-Low
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, Iron-High
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, Feritin-High
|
25 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, Transferin-Low
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, TIBC-Low
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, TSAT-Low
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, TSAT-High
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, Albumin-Low
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, hs-CRP-High
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, Potassium-High
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Baseline, Phosphorus-High
|
19 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 8, Hb-Low
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 8, Hct-Low
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 8, WBC-High
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 8, MCV-Low
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 8, RBC -High
|
25 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 8, Platelets-Low
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 8, Platelets-High
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 8, Iron-Low
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 8, Iron-High
|
22 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 8, Feritin-High
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 8, Transferin-Low
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 8, TIBC-Low
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, Hb-Low
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, Hct-Low
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, WBC-High
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, RBC -High
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, Platelets-Low
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, Platelets-High
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, Iron-Low
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, Iron-High
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, Feritin-High
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, Transferin-Low
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, Transferin-High
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, TIBC-Low
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, TSAT-Low
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, TSAT-High
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, Albumin-High
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, hs-CRP-High
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24,Potassium-Low
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Marked Laboratory Abnormalities
At Week 24, Phosphorus-High
|
11 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Mircera
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Mircera
n=33 participants at risk
Eligible participants received Mircera IV, once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 mcg which was based on the Epoetin dose of \<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 IU/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Decrease of state awareness
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Colic renal
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiovascular event
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Mircera
n=33 participants at risk
Eligible participants received Mircera IV, once every four weeks for 24 weeks. Participants received a starting dose of Mircera 100, 150 or 200 mcg which was based on the Epoetin dose of \<8000, 8000-16000, or \>16000 IU/Week, administered during the week preceding the switch to the study drug.
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Hepatitis
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
9.1%
3/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Decrease of state of awareness
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haemorrhoid
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Itching
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Allergy
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Food allergy
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiovascular event
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menstruate
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
|
6.1%
2/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Colic renal
|
3.0%
1/33 • Up to 28 weeks
Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Safety Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had a safety assessment performed post baseline.
|
Additional Information
Roche Trial Information Hotline
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER