Efficacy and Safety of BIIB019 (Daclizumab High Yield Process) Versus Interferon β 1a in Participants With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

NCT ID: NCT01064401

Last Updated: 2016-07-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1841 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary study objective is to test the superiority of Daclizumab High Yield Process (DAC HYP) compared to interferon β 1a (IFN β-1a) in preventing multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse in participants with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

The secondary study objectives are to test the superiority of DAC HYP compared to IFN β-1a in slowing functional decline and disability progression and maintaining quality of life in this participant population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Daclizumab High Yield Process 150 mg SC

Daclizumab High Yield Process (DAC HYP) 150mg subcutaneous (SC) injection once every 4 weeks plus placebo to IFN β-1a intramuscular (IM) injection once weekly for 96 to 144 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BIIB019 (Daclizumab High Yield Process)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Daclizumab High Yield Process for subcutaneous injection

Interferon beta-1a Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to interferon beta-1a intramuscular injection

IFN β-1a 30 µg IM

Interferon beta-1a (IFN β-1a) 30 µg IM once weekly plus placebo to DAC HYP SC once every 4 weeks for 96 to 144 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Interferon beta-1a

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Interferon beta-1a for intramuscular injection

Daclizumab High Yield Process Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to Daclizumab High Yield Process subcutaneous injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BIIB019 (Daclizumab High Yield Process)

Daclizumab High Yield Process for subcutaneous injection

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Interferon beta-1a Placebo

Placebo to interferon beta-1a intramuscular injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Interferon beta-1a

Interferon beta-1a for intramuscular injection

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Daclizumab High Yield Process Placebo

Placebo to Daclizumab High Yield Process subcutaneous injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DAC HYP Avonex IFN β-1a

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must have a confirmed diagnosis of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), and a cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating lesion(s) consistent with MS
* Must have a baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) between 0.0 and 5.0, inclusive
* Male subjects and female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to practice effective contraception during the study and be willing and able to continue contraception for 4 months after their last dose of study treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Known intolerance, contraindication to, or history of non-compliance with Avonex® 30 µg
* History of treatment with Daclizumab High Yield Process (Dac HYP)
* History of malignancy
* History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions
* Known hypersensitivity to study drugs or their excipients
* History of abnormal laboratory results indicative of any significant disease
* History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or other immunodeficient conditions
* History of drug or alcohol abuse (as defined by the Investigator) within the 2 years prior to randomization
* History of seizure disorder or unexplained blackouts OR history of a seizure within 6 months prior to Baseline
* History of suicidal ideation or an episode of clinically severe depression (as determined by the Investigator) within 3 months prior to Day 1
* An MS relapse that has occurred within the 50 days prior to randomization AND/OR the subject has not stabilized from a previous relapse prior to randomization
* Known history of, or positive screening test result for hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B virus
* Varicella or herpes zoster virus infection or any severe viral infection within 6 weeks before screening
* Exposure to varicella zoster virus within 21 days before screening
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AbbVie

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Biogen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Biogen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Gilbert, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pompano Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sunrise, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Worchester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Clinton Township, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Latham, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Franklin, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kirkland, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Research Site

Godoy Cruz, Mendoza Province, Argentina

Site Status

Research Site

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Research Site

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Woodville, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Heidelberg West, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Belo Horizonte, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Brasília, Federal District, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

São Paulo, Rio Grande, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Gatineau, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Brno, Jihočeský kraj, Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Jihlava, Kraj Vysočina, Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Olomouc, Olomoucký kraj, Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, Prague, Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Havířov, Severomoravksy Krav, Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Jihlava, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Glostrup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Odense C, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Oulu, Oulu, Finland

Site Status

Research Site

Tampere, Western Finalnd, Finland

Site Status

Research Site

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Research Site

Seinäjoki, , Finland

Site Status

Research Site

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Research Site

Strasbourg, Alsace, France

Site Status

Research Site

Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France

Site Status

Research Site

Caen, Basse-normandie, France

Site Status

Research Site

Amiens, Picardie, France

Site Status

Research Site

Nice, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur Region, France

Site Status

Research Site

Bourdeaux, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lomme, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Bobigny, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Research Site

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Research Site

Bad Mergentheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Bamberg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

München, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Neuburg an der Donau, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hamburg, City state of Hamburg, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Marburg, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Trier, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, Attica, Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Heraklion, Crete, Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Thessaloniki, Macedoni, Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, Budapest, Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Székesfehérvár, Fejér, Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Győr, Győr-Moson-Sopron, Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Esztergom, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Site Status

Research Site

Delhi, Dwivdee, India

Site Status

Research Site

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Research Site

Trivandrum, Kerala, India

Site Status

Research Site

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Research Site

Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Research Site

New Delhi, , India

Site Status

Research Site

Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Site Status

Research Site

Ashkelon, Ashqelon, Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Tzrifin, Beer Yaakov, Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Petah Tikva, Petah Tiqwa, Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Tzfat, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Bari, Bari, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Catania, Catania, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Genova, Genova, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Cefalù, PA, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Roma, Roma, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Orbassano, Torino, Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Padua, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Chisinau, , Moldova

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Grudziądz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lublin, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Kielce, Swietokrzycie, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Olsztyn, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Szczecin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Bydgoszczas, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Plewiska, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lódz, Łódź Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Bucurest, București, Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Timișoara, Timiș County, Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Târgu Mures, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Kazan', Povolje-Tatarstan, Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Yekaterinburg, Ural, Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Yaroslavl, Yaroslavlr, Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Kaluga, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Krasnoyarsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Perm, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Tomsk, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Tyumen, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Research Site

Kragujevac, , Serbia

Site Status

Research Site

Niš, , Serbia

Site Status

Research Site

Novi Sad, , Serbia

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Córdoba, Cordoba, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Seville, Sevilla, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Girona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Lugano, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kyviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Poltava, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Vinnitsa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Brighton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

New Castle Upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Romford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Salford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Brazil Canada Czechia Denmark Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary India Ireland Israel Italy Mexico Moldova Poland Romania Russia Serbia Spain Sweden Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Loomis SJ, Sadhu N, Fisher E, Gafson AR, Huang Y, Yang C, Hughes EE, Marshall E, Herman A, John S, Runz H, Jia X, Bhangale T, Bronson PG. Genome-wide study of longitudinal brain imaging measures of multiple sclerosis progression across six clinical trials. Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 31;13(1):14313. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41099-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37652990 (View on PubMed)

Castrogiovanni N, Mostert J, Repovic P, Bowen JD, Uitdehaag BMJ, Strijbis EMM, Cutter GR, Koch MW. Longitudinal Changes in Cognitive Test Scores in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: An Analysis of the DECIDE Dataset. Neurology. 2023 Jul 4;101(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207301. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37072219 (View on PubMed)

Cohan S, Kappos L, Giovannoni G, Wiendl H, Selmaj K, Havrdova EK, Rose J, Greenberg S, Phillips G, Ma W, Wang P, Lima G, Sabatella G. Efficacy of daclizumab beta versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a on disability progression across patient demographic and disease activity subgroups in DECIDE. Mult Scler. 2018 Dec;24(14):1883-1891. doi: 10.1177/1352458517735190. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28984179 (View on PubMed)

Benedict RH, Cohan S, Lynch SG, Riester K, Wang P, Castro-Borrero W, Elkins J, Sabatella G. Improved cognitive outcomes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with daclizumab beta: Results from the DECIDE study. Mult Scler. 2018 May;24(6):795-804. doi: 10.1177/1352458517707345. Epub 2017 May 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28485186 (View on PubMed)

Liu Y, Vollmer T, Havrdova E, Riester K, Lee A, Phillips G, Wang P, Sabatella G. Impact of daclizumab versus interferon beta-1a on patient-reported outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017 Jan;11:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28104250 (View on PubMed)

Krueger JG, Kircik L, Hougeir F, Friedman A, You X, Lucas N, Greenberg SJ, Sweetser M, Castro-Borrero W, McCroskery P, Elkins J. Cutaneous Adverse Events in the Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Comparator DECIDE Study of Daclizumab High-Yield Process Versus Intramuscular Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Adv Ther. 2016 Jul;33(7):1231-45. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0353-2. Epub 2016 Jun 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27251051 (View on PubMed)

Kappos L, Wiendl H, Selmaj K, Arnold DL, Havrdova E, Boyko A, Kaufman M, Rose J, Greenberg S, Sweetser M, Riester K, O'Neill G, Elkins J. Daclizumab HYP versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 8;373(15):1418-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501481.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26444729 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-012500-11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

205MS301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.