Evaluation of Vaccination Reminder/Recall Systems for Adolescent Patients
NCT ID: NCT01057888
Last Updated: 2016-01-20
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10599 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-12-31
2010-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of reminder/recall for adolescents: 10,599 adolescents within the managed care organization (MCO) will be randomized into one of three arms: 1) mailed reminders, 2) autodialer telephone messages or 3) standard of care of their practice (no messages from the intervention).
Hypothesis 1: Reminder/recall will increase the receipt of immunizations and preventive services
Hypothesis 2: Telephone (autodialer) reminders will be more effective than mailed reminders
Hypothesis 3: The impact of reminders will be greatest for the most high-risk subgroups which have low baseline immunization rates.
Hypothesis 4: Mailed reminders will be more costly (and less effective) than telephone reminders.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Vaccination Reminder/Recall Systems for Adolescent Patients
NCT00715234
COVID-19 Booster Dose Reminder/Recall for Adolescents
NCT05571657
Study of Adolescent Immunization Recall Systems
NCT01390363
Adolescent Vaccination Reminder Study
NCT01732315
Reducing Delay in Vaccination of Children: Logistic Barriers
NCT03516682
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Autodialer
Autodialer reminder/recall
Autodialer
Autodialer telephone calls
Letters
Mailed reminder letters
Letters
Mailed reminder letters
Controls
Controls
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Autodialer
Autodialer telephone calls
Letters
Mailed reminder letters
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient of a participating practice
* Ages 10.75 to \<18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
* ICD-9 diagnosis of 999.4 for anaphylactic reaction to a vaccine or its components.
* Encephalopathy within 7 days of a previous dose of a pertussis containing vaccine not attributable to another identifiable cause
* Guillain-Barre- ICD-9 code is 357.0
11 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Peter G Szilagyi MD MPH
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter G Szilagyi, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Rochester
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RSRB00026761
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.