Evaluation of Vaccination Reminder/Recall Systems for Adolescent Patients

NCT ID: NCT01057888

Last Updated: 2016-01-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10599 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-12-31

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators will design and implement a randomized clinical trial to test, on a community-wide level, the effectiveness of managed care based tracking/reminder/recall on improving vaccination coverage among adolescents.

The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of reminder/recall for adolescents: 10,599 adolescents within the managed care organization (MCO) will be randomized into one of three arms: 1) mailed reminders, 2) autodialer telephone messages or 3) standard of care of their practice (no messages from the intervention).

Hypothesis 1: Reminder/recall will increase the receipt of immunizations and preventive services

Hypothesis 2: Telephone (autodialer) reminders will be more effective than mailed reminders

Hypothesis 3: The impact of reminders will be greatest for the most high-risk subgroups which have low baseline immunization rates.

Hypothesis 4: Mailed reminders will be more costly (and less effective) than telephone reminders.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Immunization Status Well Child Care Visit

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Autodialer

Autodialer reminder/recall

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Autodialer

Intervention Type OTHER

Autodialer telephone calls

Letters

Mailed reminder letters

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Letters

Intervention Type OTHER

Mailed reminder letters

Controls

Controls

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Autodialer

Autodialer telephone calls

Intervention Type OTHER

Letters

Mailed reminder letters

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Member of the Monroe Plan for Medical Care (managed care organization)
* Patient of a participating practice
* Ages 10.75 to \<18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria

* Member of the Monroe Plan for Medical care for less than 6 months
* ICD-9 diagnosis of 999.4 for anaphylactic reaction to a vaccine or its components.
* Encephalopathy within 7 days of a previous dose of a pertussis containing vaccine not attributable to another identifiable cause
* Guillain-Barre- ICD-9 code is 357.0
Minimum Eligible Age

11 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Peter G Szilagyi MD MPH

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter G Szilagyi, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Rochester

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RSRB00026761

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The 3rd COPENHAGEN Puberty Study
NCT04884620 RECRUITING