Laryngeal Mask or Endotracheal Tube for Back Surgery in the Prone Position

NCT ID: NCT01041352

Last Updated: 2012-01-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

136 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-31

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to compare anaesthesia (for back surgery) using endotracheal intubation (patients anaesthized in the supine position)with anaesthesia using a laryngeal mask (anaesthesia induced and the laryngeal mask placed with the patient in the prone position on the operation table) as regards advantages, adverse effects and time spent. The anaesthesia in the 2 groups of patients is identical (propofol, remifentanil, rocuronium). Two groups of 70 pt. each are included in the stud. The inclusion criterias are patients 18-70 yrs., ASA group 1-2, normal airways, patients scheduled for back surgery with an estimated duration of less than 2 hours.

Adverse effects (related to the placement on the operation table i.e. pain in the arms or shoulders, pain in the throat, blood in the sputum, irritation in the eyes etc.) and time spent with all the procedures (anaesthesia, placement of the airway, surgery and emergence from the anaesthesia are registered. The hypothesis is that the method using the laryngeal mask is faster and with fewer adverse effects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anaesthesia Adverse Effects

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endotracheal group

airway management: endotracheal tube

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Unomedical endotracheal tube

laryngeal mask group

airway management: laryngeal mask

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

laryngeal mask

Intervention Type DEVICE

LMA Proseal

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

laryngeal mask

LMA Proseal

Intervention Type DEVICE

endotracheal tube

Unomedical endotracheal tube

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients scheduled for backsurgery of an espected duration less than 2 hours,
* Age 18-70 years,
* ASA (american society of anaaesthesiology) class 1-2,
* Normal airways

Exclusion Criteria

* Body mass index \>35
* Expected time of surgery \> 2 hours
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Karsten Skovgaard Olsen

Consultant, DMSC

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Karsten S Olsen, MD, DMSc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Glostrup University Hospital

Glostrup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Olsen KS, Petersen JT, Pedersen NA, Rovsing L. Self-positioning followed by induction of anaesthesia and insertion of a laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation and subsequent positioning for spinal surgery in the prone position: a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 May;31(5):259-65. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000004.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24247413 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Laryngeal mask or endotracheal

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.