Enteral Nutrition in the Treatment of Pancreatic Fistulas - A Prospective Study
NCT ID: NCT01025414
Last Updated: 2009-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-07-31
2009-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
STUDY OBJECTIVES 2.1 Primary Objective The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectives of enteral nutrition in the treatment of pancreatic fistulas. The ratio of pancreatic fistula closure after 30 days is selected as the primary outcome measure with the null hypothesis assuming that enteral nutrition provides better results than parenteral nutrition as far as the closure ratio, time to closure and treatment-related complications are concerned.
2.2 Secondary Objectives
The secondary objectives are to:
* determine time to fistula closure (defined as time between initiation of treatment and confirmed fistula closure),
* determine rates of fistula and treatment-related complications,
* assess changes in quality of life (QoL),
* determine economic costs of therapy. (for such terms as: fistula closure, time to closure see definition on page 3) For QoL assessment the EORTC QLQ - PAN26 score in Polish version (translation was approved by EORTC) will be used.
Benefits of the study:
1. the implementation of safer and less expensive conservative procedure. Basis: Costs of enteral nutrition are significantly lower than PN and EN is significantly safer than PN especially as far as infectious complications are concerned.
2. the enhancement of indications for enteral nutrition.
The confirmation of the null hypothesis allows recommending enteral nutrition as a method of choice for pancreatic fistula treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
enteral nutrition
Group A - enteral feeding was started 2 to 4 hours after catheter placement via enteral tube inserted via endoscope below the Treitz's ligament into first intestinal loop (location of the tip) (Nutricial Ltd. Flocare). The initial flow rate was 10 ml/ hour, final 125 ml/ hour. Energy requirements was calculated using following rule: 0.15-0.2 gN/ kg and 130-170 kcal/ gN. Diet: Peptisorb (Nutricia Ltd.) - oligopeptide diet well tolerated by intestines
Parenteral nutrition
Parenteral nutrition was started 2 to 4 hours after venous catheter placement (standard Arrow type, the tip located 5 cm over right vestibule, the location confirmed on chest X-ray) and continued until oral diet covering at least 60% of daily caloric and protein demand. The energy requirements were calculated using following rule: 0.15-0.2 gN/ kg and 130-170 kcal/ gN. Parenteral diets: Aminoplasmal 10%, Lipofundin LCT/MCT 10 and 20%, 40% Glucose, Tracutil (microelements and trace elements), Cernevit (vitamins), electrolytes
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* good general status (Karnoffsky \> 80, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale 0 or 1; see Appendix 2);
* NRS and MUST evaluation - low/ medium risk patients not requiring parenteral nutrition as the essence treatment option,
* no PF's complication requiring special treatment present, such as intraabdominal abscess formation, pleuropneumonia, bleeding, paralytic ileus, etc. Complications will be diagnosed and treated according to generally accepted medical knowledge, standards and procedures.
* age below 80 and over 18;
* in case of neoplastic patients: no confirmed neoplastic dissemination nor distant metastases;
* no severe concomitant disease (heart failure, COPD, CABG, etc.);
* no history of known allergies or drug intolerance;
* informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* poor general status (Karnoffsky \<80, ECOG \> 1);
* the presence of serious complications; see above
* recent history of severe heart, lung, kidney or liver failure;
* the history of allergies or drug intolerance;
* confirmed neoplastic spread;
* severe malnutrition requiring combined treatment (PN+EN)
* withdrawal of consent
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jagiellonian University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jagiellonian University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stanislaw Klek, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Jagiellonian University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nutrimed Medical Corporation
Krakow, Malopolska, Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Klek S, Sierzega M, Turczynowski L, Szybinski P, Szczepanek K, Kulig J. Enteral and parenteral nutrition in the conservative treatment of pancreatic fistula: a randomized clinical trial. Gastroenterology. 2011 Jul;141(1):157-63, 163.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.03.040. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CMUJ-FIS-1
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Fistula-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id