Study to Evaluate the Effects Icodextrin Versus Dianeal on Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
NCT ID: NCT01021878
Last Updated: 2014-10-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-10-31
2012-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
2. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To measure changes in HOMA index when non-diabetic patients in APD were exposed to 7,5% Icodextrin for the long-dwell; and to compare such changes with those produced by 2,5% glucose for the long-dwell.
3. PRIMARY OUTCOME: The primary efficacy outcome was to measure HOMA index to set the differences with regard to baseline values of this variable for the two groups as well as in each group, which showed control of the glucose metabolism.
STAGE OF THE STUDY : Phase IV postmarket study
DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to receive either to Extraneal (7,5% Icodextrin) or 2.5% Dianeal during the long-dwell.
SAMPLE SIZE: Randomization Upon completion of the study TOTAL: 120 60 ExtranealTM 60 30 Dianeal® 60 30
Duration: 1 year.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dianeal, Extraneal, Nutrineal (D-E-N) Versus Dianeal Only in Diabetic Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) Patients
NCT01219959
Phase IIa Trial to Determine the Effects of Bardoxolone Methyl on Renal Function in Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy
NCT00664027
IMPENDIA- PEN VS Dianeal Only Improved Metabolic Control In Diabetic CAPD and APD Patients
NCT00567489
IMPENDIA- PEN VS Dianeal Only Improved Metabolic Control In Diabetic CAPD and APD Patients
NCT00567398
Study to Evaluate the Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Effects of LX4211 in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes and Renal Impairment
NCT01555008
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1.1 PROTOCOLE TITLE : A RANDOMIZED, OPEN-LABEL CLINICAL TRIAL TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTS OF ICODEXTRIN Vs 2,5% DIANEAL USED FOR THE LONG-DWELL ON HOMA INDEX IN PREVALENT, NON-DIABETIC, PATIENTS IN AUTOMATED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS (APD)
1.2 MAIN RESEARCHERS: Roberto Pecoits Filho, Thyago P. Moraes
1.3 LOCATION OF STUDY: Multicentric study in Brazil.
1.4 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To measure changes in HOMA index when non-diabetic patients in APD were exposed to 7,5% Icodextrin for the long-dwell; and to compare such changes with those produced by 2,5% glucose for the long-dwell.
1.5 PRIMARY OUTCOME: The primary efficacy outcome was to measure HOMA index to set the differences with regard to baseline values of this variable for the two groups as well as in each group, which showed control of the glucose metabolism.
1.6 SECONDARY OUTCOMES:
1.6.1 Other efficacy outcomes were total UF, long-dwell UF, and preprandial glycemia (taken first in the morning before breakfast), serum insulin levels and glycated haemoglobin.
1.6.2 The incidence of adverse events will be measured as a safety outcome.
1.7 STAGE OF THE STUDY : Phase IV postmarket study
1.8 DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to receive either to Extraneal (7,5% Icodextrin) or 2.5% Dianeal during the long-dwell.
1.9 SAMPLE SIZE: Randomization Upon completion of the study TOTAL: 100 60 ExtranealTM 50 30 Dianeal® 50 30
1.12 PHARMACEUTICAL FORM, ROUTE OF DE ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE
ExtranealTM (7.5% Icodextrin) solution for Peritoneal Dialysis:
It is labelled as "solution for dialysis" to be administered within the study for a period of one (1) year.
Available in 2 liter bags of peritoneal dialysis solution (Twin Bag) for CAPD, this product will be used during the long-dwell.
Dianeal® PD4 (2.5% Dextrose) solution for Peritoneal Dialysis:
It is labelled as 2.27% glucose-based "solution for dialysis", to be administered within the study for a period of one (1) year.
Available in 2 and 2.5 liter bags of peritoneal dialysis solution (Twin Bag) for CAPD, this product will be used during the long-dwell.
Duration: 1 year.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
icodextrin
glucose sparing alternative dialysis solution
icodextrin
glucose sparing dialysis solution
dextrose
dianeal, Control group, standard treatment
Dianeal
glucose based dialysis solution
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
icodextrin
glucose sparing dialysis solution
Dianeal
glucose based dialysis solution
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* High PET value, average-high or average-low.
* Cause of renal chronic disease other than diabetes mellitus.
* Patient in APD
* Prevalent patient in APD (defined as at least 90 total days of dialysis therapy)
Exclusion Criteria
* A Charlson comorbidity index \>7, or a life expectancy \< 12 months as assessed by the treating physician.
* Positive VIH.
* Episodes of peritonitis during the month preceding the randomization.
* Significant cardiovascular, metabolic or infectious complications during the month preceding the randomization.
* Patients with active cancer.
* Patients with known allergies to corn starch polymers.
* Patients who are unable to provide an informed consent because of significant psychiatric disorder or mental illness
* Patients not meeting adequacy goals several months after the change in the dosage regime.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
INDUSTRY
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Roberto Pecoits-Filho
MD, PhD, FASN
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roberto Pecoits-Filho, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Parana
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital São João de Deus
Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Clinica de Doencas Renais
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Instituto do Rim de Curitiba
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
Nefroclinica de Caxias do Sul
Caxias do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Clinese
Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil
Universidade Estadual Paulista
Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PUCPR 01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.