The Effect of Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Elderly Patients With Crytogenic Stoke/TCI
NCT ID: NCT01018355
Last Updated: 2010-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
3000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-10-31
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PC-Trial: Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Embolism
NCT00166257
Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Solysafe Septal Occluder in Patients With Atrial Septum Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale
NCT00207376
GORE® Septal Occluder Device for Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) Closure in Stroke Patients
NCT00738894
Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) Closure at the Time of Endovascular Cardiac Electronic Device Implantation
NCT03232450
Procedural Success and Safety of the Nit-Occlud® Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) Closure Device and Its Application System
NCT00968032
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The prevalence of PFO in patients with crytogenic (without known causes) stroke is much higher (about 40%)than the general population (about 10%). This has led to the theory that the presence of PFO can lead to stroke, by the passage of emboli from the peripheral venous circulation through the PFO to the brain by right-to-left shunting of the blood.
There are no existing data from prospective randomized studies focusing on the effect of device closure PFO in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Some observational retrospective studies have shown a beneficial effect in the reduction of recurrent stoke in patients younger that 50 years with cryptogenic stroke when PFO has been closed with a percutaneous device closure(PCD). Some studies have reported an 0% to 3.4% annual recurrence rate of stroke or TIA in patients treated with PDC. The recurrence rate of stroke or TIA in patients with crytogenic stroke or TIA in ordinary antithrombotic treatment is about 5-15 %.
The primary objective of this study is to assess whether percutaneous device closure of patent foramen ovale is superior to conventional antithrombotic treatment in preventing stroke recurrence in elderly patients above 50 years of age.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Device closure of PFO
Device closure of PFO followed by 6 month treatment with clopidogrel 75 mg and 75 - 150 mg of aspirin daily followed by a life long treatment with dipyridamol 200 mg twice daily plus 75-150 mg aspirin daily
Percutaneous device closure of patent foramen ovale
Percutaneous device closure of patent foramen ovale
Medical anticoagulative treatment
Life long treatment with dipyridamol 200 mg twice daily plus 75-150 mg aspirin daily
Percutaneous device closure of patent foramen ovale
Percutaneous device closure of patent foramen ovale
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous device closure of patent foramen ovale
Percutaneous device closure of patent foramen ovale
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Above 50 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
* Dementia
* Allergy to aspirin
* Risk of non-compliance
* Lacking ability to give written or oral consent
* Atrial Fibrillation
* Neurological deficit lasting less than 6 hours
51 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hillerod Hospital, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Department of cardiology and endocrinology at Hillerød Hospital, Denmark
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christian S Hansen, dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hillerød Hospital. dept. of cardiology and endocrinology
Niels Tønder, Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hillerød Hospital. dept. of cardiology and endocrinology
Kasper K Iversen, Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hillerød Hospital. dept. of cardiology and endocrinology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dept. of cardiology and endocrinology H
Hillerød, Region H, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Hillerod-294
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.