Stem Cell Factor (SCF) Priming of Haematopoietic Stem Cell Grafts in Malignant Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT01016795

Last Updated: 2015-06-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1999-01-31

Study Completion Date

2009-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clinical Hypothesis:

It is expected that by removing chemotherapy and adding ancestim to the mobilization scheme in most of the subjects sufficient PBPC will be harvested with a minimum of toxicity and side effects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Autologous stem cell transplantation is used to support high dose chemotherapy in haematological malignancies.1-2 Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) have replaced bone marrow cells as the preferred source for transplantation due to faster blood cell recovery.3-4 One variable of major impact for posttransplant care is the number of PBPC harvested.5-8 Therefore, several clinical studies have aimed to identify priming regimens that improve progenitor and stem cell mobilizations and collections without increased toxicity. Frequently, Filgrastim (r-met HuG-CSF) is administrated alone; however, Filgrastim combined with chemotherapy has proven more effective in context of CD34+ cell numbers harvested9-11 and this combination is considered the gold standard for priming and stem cell mobilization in relapsed malignant lymphoma.

Stem cell factor (SCF) is a glycoprotein growth factor that acts on haematopoietic blood cell progenitors.12 Whereas SCF alone exerts little colony-stimulating activity on normal human bone marrow cells in vitro, combination of SCF with other recombinant haematopoietic cytokines results in a synergistic increase in numbers of colonies.13 In vivo, the addition of SCF to G-CSF (Filgrastim) synergistically increases PBPC mobilization compared to Filgrastim alone.14-17 Several clinical trials have reported the ability of the combination of SCF with Filgrastim to mobilize PBPC in patients with lymphoma, multiple myeloma, breast and ovarian cancers even in heavily pretreated patients.18-26 Priming using chemotherapy is toxic and costly11 and new priming procedures need to be established, which is the background for this randomized pilot study. The hypothesis is that elimination of chemotherapy from the priming regimen may decrease the overall toxicity and the ability to collect a sufficient autograft which, however, may be circumvented by adding r-metHuSCF (Ancestim) to the priming regimen. The aim of this randomized phase II trial was to evaluate safety, toxicity and efficacy of growth factors in lymphoma patients considered candidates for high dose chemotherapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malignant Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

r-metHuSCF and Filgrastim

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either chemotherapy combined with 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim (control arm B), administered by subcutaneous injection for 14 days, or the combination of 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim and SCF administered subcutaneously at a dose of 20 µg/kg/d (experimental arm A) for 8 days. Different injection sites were used for each cytokine.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

r-metHuSCF and Filgrastim

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either chemotherapy combined with 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim (control arm B), administered by subcutaneous injection for 14 days, or the combination of 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim and SCF administered subcutaneously at a dose of 20 µg/kg/d (experimental arm A) for 8 days. Different injection sites were used for each cytokine.

r-metHuSCF and Filgrastim

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either chemotherapy combined with 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim (control arm B), administered by subcutaneous injection for 14 days, or the combination of 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim and SCF administered subcutaneously at a dose of 20 µg/kg/d (experimental arm A) for 8 days. Different injection sites were used for each cytokine.

Chemotherapy plus Filgrastim

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either chemotherapy combined with 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim (control arm B), administered by subcutaneous injection for 14 days, or the combination of 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim and SCF administered subcutaneously at a dose of 20 µg/kg/d (experimental arm A) for 8 days. Different injection sites were used for each cytokine.

Cyclophosphamide and Filgrastim

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either chemotherapy combined with 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim (control arm B), administered by subcutaneous injection for 14 days, or the combination of 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim and SCF administered subcutaneously at a dose of 20 µg/kg/d (experimental arm A) for 8 days. Different injection sites were used for each cytokine.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

r-metHuSCF and Filgrastim

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either chemotherapy combined with 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim (control arm B), administered by subcutaneous injection for 14 days, or the combination of 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim and SCF administered subcutaneously at a dose of 20 µg/kg/d (experimental arm A) for 8 days. Different injection sites were used for each cytokine.

Chemotherapy plus Filgrastim

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either chemotherapy combined with 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim (control arm B), administered by subcutaneous injection for 14 days, or the combination of 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim and SCF administered subcutaneously at a dose of 20 µg/kg/d (experimental arm A) for 8 days. Different injection sites were used for each cytokine.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

r-metHuSCF and Filgrastim

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either chemotherapy combined with 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim (control arm B), administered by subcutaneous injection for 14 days, or the combination of 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim and SCF administered subcutaneously at a dose of 20 µg/kg/d (experimental arm A) for 8 days. Different injection sites were used for each cytokine.

Intervention Type DRUG

r-metHuSCF and Filgrastim

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either chemotherapy combined with 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim (control arm B), administered by subcutaneous injection for 14 days, or the combination of 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim and SCF administered subcutaneously at a dose of 20 µg/kg/d (experimental arm A) for 8 days. Different injection sites were used for each cytokine.

Intervention Type DRUG

Chemotherapy plus Filgrastim

Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either chemotherapy combined with 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim (control arm B), administered by subcutaneous injection for 14 days, or the combination of 10 µg/kg/d Filgrastim and SCF administered subcutaneously at a dose of 20 µg/kg/d (experimental arm A) for 8 days. Different injection sites were used for each cytokine.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Stem Cell Factor and G-CSF Stem Cell Factor and G-CSF Priming chemotherapy and G-CSF

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin lymphomas (Real classification)

* in relapse
* refractory to initial chemotherapy
* with partial response after initial therapy
* Age \> 18 years and \< 65 years
* ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2
* Life expectancy of \> 6 months with treatment
* ANC \> or equal to 1.5 x 109/L, Platelets \> or equal to 100 x 109/L
* Serum creatinine \< or equal to 150 µmol/L, bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), and alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) less than twice the upper limit defined at the investigating laboratory
* Prior to mobilization chemotherapy subject has given written informed consent, personally dated

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior DexaBEAM or miniBEAM therapy and prior bone marrow or PBPC transplant
* Any history of seasonal or recurrent asthma within the preceding 10 years.
* Any history of anaphylactic / anaphylactoid-type event manifested by disseminated urticaria, laryngeal oedema, and / or bronchospasm (example, food, insect bites, etc.). Subjects with drug allergies, manifested solely by rash and / or urticaria, are not excluded
* Any history of angioedema or recurrent urticaria
* Clinical or microbiological evidence of infection at the date of enrollment.
* Subjects with a concurrent malignancy
* Significant non-malignant disease including documented HIV infection, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, poorly controlled diabetes, coronary angioplasty within six months, myocardial infarction within the last six months, or uncontrolled atrial or ventricular cardiac arrhythmias
* Pregnant or breast feeding subjects or those of child-bearing potential who are not using adequate contraceptive precautions
* Concurrent enrollment on any other protocol using an investigational drug
* Haematopoietic growth factors administered within one week of study entry
* Subjects with a psychiatric, addictive or any disorder which compromises ability to give truly informed consent for participation in this study
* Known sensitivity to E. coli derived products
* Concurrent use of beta adrenergic blocking agents
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Herlev Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Helsinki University Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Turku University Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Linkoeping

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Umeå University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oslo University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nordic Lymphoma Group

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Aalborg University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department of Haematology Aalborg Hospital Denmark

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hans E Johnsen, MD DMSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Aalborg Hospital and Herlev University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aalborg Hospital

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Herlev University Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

University Hospital Helsinki

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

University Hospital Turku

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Radiumhospitalet

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

University Hospital Linköping

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

University Hospital Umeå

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark Finland Norway Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-KA-99040-GMS

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SCF 980266

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparing Treatments for Multiple Myeloma
NCT00001750 COMPLETED PHASE2