The Effect of a Pre- and Postoperative Orthogeriatric Service

NCT ID: NCT01009268

Last Updated: 2013-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

332 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators' aim is to assess the effect of a model of preoperative as well as early postoperative care, treatment and rehabilitation in a dedicated orthogeriatric ward in a single-blind randomised study.

The investigators' main hypothesis is that an orthogeriatric service may improve long-time cognitive outcome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will be carried out in close cooperation between the Orthopaedic Centre and the Department of Geriatric Medicine. The patients will be randomized in the Emergency Department in accordance with procedures already established for a recently finished trial. The intervention group will be transferred as soon as possible to the orthogeriatric ward, stabilised there preoperatively, and transferred back to the same ward postoperatively for further treatment and rehabilitation, while the control group will be treated in a traditional orthopaedic ward. Operative and anaesthesiologic procedures will be the same in the two groups.

The primary endpoint is chosen in order to optimize clinical relevance as well as sensitivity to change within a wide range of functional performance, and will be recorded four months after the fracture. Our main hypothesis is that an orthogeriatric service may improve long-time cognitive outcome. Accordingly, we will use a composite endpoint tapping cognitive functioning in the lower as well as the higher spectre of performance by these two instruments:

* Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR), proxy-based scale for severity of dementia, that is able to detect differences also between patients with severe dementia. The scale consists of six questions, each rated 0-3, adding up to a sumscore of 0-18 ("sum of boxes"). The scale is frequently used in dementia treatment trials, and is shown to be valid and reliable. CDR will be scored based on the best available source (relative, staff in nursing home or home nursing service)
* The 10 words memory task from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease battery (CERAD). This test is shown to be sensitive for memory changes in persons that have a good or fairly good cognitive functioning. We will use the immediate recall and the delayed recall parts of this task, i.e. two scales.

The primary endpoint will be assessed after four months, by a specially trained research assistant blinded to allocation. The patients will be re-assessed after 12 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dementia Delirium

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Orthogeriatric intervention

The intervention group will be transferred as soon as possible to the orthogeriatric ward, stabilised there preoperatively, and transferred back to the same ward postoperatively for further treatment and rehabilitation, while the control group will be treated in a traditional orthopaedic ward. Operative and anaesthesiologic procedures will be the same in the two groups.Clinical routines for the orthogeriatric service has been developed during the pilot phase in 2008 and 2009, and are documented in the electronic library of clinical handbooks at Department of Geriatric Medicine.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

• Eligible patients will be admitted acutely for a femoral neck fracture, a trochanteric or a subtrochanteric femoral fracture.

Exclusion Criteria

* Hip fracture as part of multi-trauma or high energy trauma (defined as a fall from a higher level than 1 metre). One recent fracture in addition to the hip fracture (e.g. radius or shoulder) is acceptable.
* Regarded as moribund at admittance.
* Absence of a valid informed consent or assent.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Research Council of Norway

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ullevaal University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Torgeir Bruun Wyller, MD, Prof.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Oslo, Fac of Med., Geriatric dep.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Handoll HH, Cameron ID, Mak JC, Panagoda CE, Finnegan TP. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 12;11(11):CD007125. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007125.pub3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34766330 (View on PubMed)

Torbergsen AC, Watne LO, Frihagen F, Wyller TB, Mowe M. Effects of nutritional intervention upon bone turnover in elderly hip fracture patients. Randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019 Feb;29:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2017.11.012. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30661701 (View on PubMed)

Torbergsen AC, Watne LO, Wyller TB, Frihagen F, Stromsoe K, Bohmer T, Mowe M. Micronutrients and the risk of hip fracture: Case-control study. Clin Nutr. 2017 Apr;36(2):438-443. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.12.014. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26795217 (View on PubMed)

Watne LO, Torbergsen AC, Conroy S, Engedal K, Frihagen F, Hjorthaug GA, Juliebo V, Raeder J, Saltvedt I, Skovlund E, Wyller TB. The effect of a pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric service on cognitive function in patients with hip fracture: randomized controlled trial (Oslo Orthogeriatric Trial). BMC Med. 2014 Apr 15;12:63. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-63.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24735588 (View on PubMed)

Wyller TB, Watne LO, Torbergsen A, Engedal K, Frihagen F, Juliebo V, Saltvedt I, Skovlund E, Raeder J, Conroy S. The effect of a pre- and post-operative orthogeriatric service on cognitive function in patients with hip fracture. The protocol of the Oslo Orthogeriatrics Trial. BMC Geriatr. 2012 Jul 20;12:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-36.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22817102 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1361

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.