Low-energy Laser Therapy for Prevention of Oral Mucositis in Children

NCT ID: NCT01007617

Last Updated: 2011-01-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Oral mucositis represents a major complication of cytotoxic chemotherapy among cancer in children. Low-power laser therapy (LPLT) has been used to reduce the incidence of oral mucositis in patients who are receiving high-dose chemotherapy. The aim of this study is to compare two preventives energies delivered of LPLT to oral mucosa in decreasing the severity of mucositis in children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mucositis is one of the main complications of cytotoxic chemotherapy and total body irradiation in children cancers. Local and systemic treatments are not efficiency or limited by side effects, (particularly for opioid). Two randomized recent studies in adult have showed the efficiency of LPLT (wavelength 650nm at the intensity of 4J/cm²) in prevention of severe mucositis. In pediatrics patient, only one randomized study was performed to the same intensity of 4J/cm² but with a wavelength of 732nm, and did not show the evidence of profit. In theory, tissues absorption level of laser is similar at 650 and 900nm but lower around 700nm. Procedure was very well tolerated by children; the main limiting factor is the deadline directly proportional to intensity delivered.

The aim of our study is to compare two preventives energies (2J/cm² or 8 J/cm²) daily delivered of LPLT to oral mucosa in decreasing the severity of mucositis in children. Placebo study was not possible to our opinion and we preferred to compare two intensity of LPLT for three reasons : being given the sensation of heat generated by the treatment, a true placebo is difficult to obtain; considering the difficulties proceeding to large-sized clinical trials in this population, it seems to us necessary to end quickly in an optimal protocol; the main inconvenience of LPLT is the duration of the sessions, so in case of negative result, our study will generate data allowing not to realize useless too long sessions.

It's a prospective controlled study, randomized in double blind phase II, in one center. All the patients will receive LPLT (GaAlAs, wavelength 980nm) daily of the 1st in the 5th day of cytotoxic treatment. The patients will be randomized in 2 groups according to the delivered dose: 2 J/cm2/d or 8 J/cm2/d.

Main evaluation criteria: mucositis maximal intensity (WHO scale) Secondary evaluation criteria: mucositis duration, mucositis survival free, pain, opioid treatment, hospitalization, fever and infection, nutrition.

Expected clinical effects: improvement of the children's comfort; dissemination of the technique in the other oncology pediatric centers

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Oral Mucositis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

LLLT :low level laser therapy

The patients will be randomized in 2 groups according to the delivered dose: 2 J/cm2/d or 8 J/cm2/d.

Main evaluation criteria: mucositis maximal intensity (WHO scale).

Secondary evaluation criteria: mucositis duration, mucositis survival free, pain, opioid treatment, hospitalization, fever and infection, nutrition.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 0 at 18 years
* patients receiving therapy with agents likely to cause severe mucositis (grade 3 or 4)
* Patients who had developed severe mucositis previously in any chemotherapy, and receiving the same.
* Healthy oral mucosa
* informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* \- Infection active and proved, viral, bacterial or fungal oral cavity
* Malignant pathology in the oral cavity
* Preliminary local irradiation of the oral cavity
* Simultaneous treatment by an agent of prevention or treatment of mucositis in investigation
* Inclusion in a protocol with oral mucositis as one of the assessment criteria
* Absence of consent lit by parents or child
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Régional de Cancérologie et Thérapie Cellulaire Pédiatrique, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Faculté de chirurgie dentaire, Clermont-Ferrand

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre de Pharmacologie Clinique, INSERM CIC 501

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Laboratoire des Matériaux Inorganiques, ESA CNRS 6002 et ENSCCF, Université Blaise-Pascal, Aubière

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

CHU Clermont-Ferrand

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Etienne MERLIN, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Patrick LACARIN

Role: CONTACT

04.73.75.11.95

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Patrick LACARIN

Role: primary

04.73.75.11.95

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHU-0060

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.