Orvepitant (GW823296) in Adult Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
NCT ID: NCT01000493
Last Updated: 2017-09-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
132 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-11-02
2010-06-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Following an initial screening visit, subjects fulfilling the study inclusion and exclusion criteria will enter a pre-treatment screening phase to permit evaluation of the laboratory and ECG assessments and to confirm eligibility for inclusion into the study. This screening phase will be a minimum of 7 days, but no longer than 21 days. At the completion of the screening period, eligible subjects will be randomized at the baseline visit to receive either orvepitant 60mg/day or placebo (1:1 ratio). Those subjects randomized to receive placebo will receive study medication identical in appearance to that received by subjects assigned to receive orvepitant.
Efficacy will be assessed using the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) as the primary efficacy measure. Key secondary efficacy endpoints will be based on the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS), the Short PTSD Rating Interview (SPRINT), the Clinical Global Impression- Global Improvement and Severity of Illness Scales (CGI-I and CGI-S, respectively), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
Safety will be assessed by monitoring for adverse events (side effects) and through periodic laboratory evaluations (blood tests), vital signs assessments (e.g., blood pressure, heart rate, temperature) and heart function measurements (electrocardiograms, or ECGs).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Topiramate in the Treatment of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
NCT00203463
Safety & Efficacy Study Using Topiramate in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
NCT00204386
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptom Study
NCT00018798
Substance P Antagonist in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
NCT00383786
Neural Circuits in Women With Abuse and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
NCT01681849
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Efficacy will be assessed using standard symptom and severity rating scales (questionnaires). The Clinicain Adminstered PTSD Scale (CAPS) will serve as the primary measure of efficacy. Secondary efficacy endpoints include the CAPS subscale clusters (Re-Experiencing, Avoidance and Numbing, and Hyperarousal), the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS), the Short PTSD Rating Interview (SPRINT), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Clinical Global Impression- Global Improvement and Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-I and CGI-S, respectively), the Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
Safety and tolerability will be assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs or side effects), physical examinations (including vital signs such as blood pressure and heart rate), clinical laboratory assessments (blood tests), electrical recordings of the heart (electrocardiograms or ECG's), the Columbia Suicidality Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS), Massachusetts Sexual Function Questionnaire (MSFQ), Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) scale and weight change.
Blood samples will be taken at different time points to assess blood levels of orvepitant in patients, allowing the relationship between amount of orvepitant in the body and efficacy to be studied.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of orvepitant (60mg/day) versus placebo (a "sugar pill", with no active ingredients). The secondary objectives include assessing the safety and tolerability of orvepitant, assessing the profile of appearance and disappearance of orvepitant in the body (blood) following administration (i.e., assessing how long the drug remains in the body), and lastly to examine the relationship between blood levels of the drug and efficacy (i..e, the change in CAPS score relative to what it was before starting the study medication).
Following an initial screening visit, subjects fulfilling the study entrance criteria will enter a pre-treatment screening phase to permit evaluation of the laboratory and electrocardiogram assessments and to confirm eligibility for inclusion into the study. This screening phase will be a minimum of 7 days, but no longer than 21 days. Upon completion of the screening period, eligible subjects will be randomly assigned at the baseline visit to one of two treatment regimens: orvepitant 60mg/day or placebo for a 12-week treatment phase. The chances of receiving each of the two possible treatments will be equal. Orvepitant will be administered as tablets. Those subjects randomised to receive placebo will receive study medication identical in appearance to that received by subjects assigned to receive orvepitant.
During the treatment phase, subjects will be required to return to the clinic at the end of Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12. In addition, all subjects will be required to return for a follow-up visit 14 days after the last dose of study medication. In addition, all subjects with ongoing adverse events at the 14-day follow-up visit will be required to return for a further follow-up visit 28 days after the last dose of study medication. Women of child-bearing potential will also be required to attend the 28-Day follow-up visit for a pregnancy test. A further test will be performed 42 Days following the end of treatment.
Male and female outpatients between the ages of 18 to 64 years inclusive with a primary diagnosis of noncombat-related PTSD will be enrolled into this study. A total of approximately 240 subjects are expected to be enrolled at approximately 25 different study sites in North America.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Orvepitant 60 mg
60 mg/day
orvepitant
Neurokinin-1 (NK-1) antagonist
Placebo
Placebo
Inactive placebo to match orvepitant 60 mg dosage form
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
orvepitant
Neurokinin-1 (NK-1) antagonist
Placebo
Inactive placebo to match orvepitant 60 mg dosage form
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A primary diagnosis of noncombat-related Post traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
* Subjects with symptom severity considered to be at least moderate to severe.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects who have a history of failing to respond to adequate treatment for PTSD with an antidepressant/anti-anxiety drug, i..e, failure to improve following administration of at least two other antidepressants/anti-anxiety drugs, each given for at least 4 weeks.
18 Years
64 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
GSK Clinical Trials
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
GlaxoSmithKline
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Beverly Hills, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Torrance, California, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Marietta, Georgia, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Park Ridge, Illinois, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Glen Burnie, Maryland, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Weymouth, Massachusetts, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Willingboro, New Jersey, United States
GSK Investigational Site
The Bronx, New York, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Dayton, Ohio, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Garfield Heights, Ohio, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Seattle, Washington, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Brown Deer, Wisconsin, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Middleton, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ratti E, Bettica P, Alexander R, Archer G, Carpenter D, Evoniuk G, Gomeni R, Lawson E, Lopez M, Millns H, Rabiner EA, Trist D, Trower M, Zamuner S, Krishnan R, Fava M. Full central neurokinin-1 receptor blockade is required for efficacy in depression: evidence from orvepitant clinical studies. J Psychopharmacol. 2013 May;27(5):424-34. doi: 10.1177/0269881113480990. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
113211
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.