Prophylactic Bronchoscopy After Inhalation Injury in Burn Patients
NCT ID: NCT00997555
Last Updated: 2013-01-31
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-10-31
2012-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Lung Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients With Burn
NCT04125108
Toward the Development of a Bronchoscope With a Dedicated O2 Channel ?
NCT01963377
Hyperoxia During Outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Lung Disease - Does it Matter?
NCT06776731
Hyperoxia During Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Lung Disease - Does it Matter?
NCT06174207
Airway Clearance and Bronchoalveolar Lavage for Bronchiectasis Patients With Exacerbation
NCT03643302
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recent research has shown that the process of intubation for mechanical ventilation provides a portal for bacterial contamination, after which the damaged tracheobronchial mucosa quickly becomes colonized with pathogenic organisms in over 50% of the patients. Furthermore, within 15 minutes of smoke inhalation, there is significant airway edema and thickening, more prominently in the lower trachea than the upper portion. These factors place the patient with inhalation injury at high risk for pneumonia.
We have used the National Burn Repository data to previously show that patients who receive aggressive use of bronchoscopy after inhalation injury have an improved outcome in terms of decreased ventilator days, decreased ICU length of stay, decreased incidence of pneumonia, and a trend towards improved mortality. However, that data was unable to document why. It was also unable to confirm that the findings were not due to institutional bias. Therefore, one of the conclusions from that study was that a prospective trial is needed to confirm the findings.
Our hypothesis is that a scheduled and sequential use of bronchoscopy after inhalation injury as a therapeutic tool to remove secretions, slough, carbonaceous material, and screen for the early detection of pneumonia by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) will improve outcome. We will attempt to document this improvement by using the following endpoints: length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, ventilator days, incidence of pneumonia, overall morbidity and mortality with and without bronchoscopy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
bronchoscopy intervention group
Group undergoing scheduled bronchoscopy.
bronchoscopy
Scheduled bronchoscopy.
Control group
Standard treatment without scheduled bronchoscopy.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
bronchoscopy
Scheduled bronchoscopy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. \> 18 years old AND
3. patient believed to be able to survive more than 48 hours after arrival (not likely to be made DNR or comfort care) including:
* any methamphetamine explosion or
* any burn associated with fire (not chemical) of the face or blast injury to the face or
* confined in a burning space for more than 10 minutes or
* any burn with carbonaceous material around the nose or mouth or
* any burn \> 15% TBSA associated with fire (not chemical) or
* any burn associated with an explosion in a confined space.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Less than 18 years old.
3. Burned patient transferred to our facility already on mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours.
4. Patient already on antibiotics for another reason.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hurley Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John A Carr, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hurley Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hurley Medical Center
Flint, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HMC0001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.