Trial Outcomes & Findings for Promote Q Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) and Quartet Left Ventricular Heart Lead Study (NCT NCT00990665)

NCT ID: NCT00990665

Last Updated: 2019-02-27

Results Overview

The primary safety endpoint for this study is freedom from left ventricular lead-related complications through 3 months.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

178 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

3 months

Results posted on

2019-02-27

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
CRT-D and LV Lead
CRT-D and LV lead (Quartet™ lead and Promote Q® device system): Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead
Overall Study
STARTED
178
Overall Study
COMPLETED
130
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
48

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
CRT-D and LV Lead
CRT-D and LV lead (Quartet™ lead and Promote Q® device system): Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead
Overall Study
Unsuccessful Implant
8
Overall Study
Death
29
Overall Study
Heart Transplant
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
6
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
Overall Study
System Explant
3

Baseline Characteristics

Promote Q Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) and Quartet Left Ventricular Heart Lead Study

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
CRT-D and LV Lead
n=178 Participants
CRT-D and LV lead (Quartet™ lead and Promote Q® device system): Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead
Age, Continuous
68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
122 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
140 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
New York Heart Association Class
Class III
175 participants
n=5 Participants
New York Heart Association Class
Class IV
3 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Population: Patients implanted with a Promote Q CRT-D device and Quartet LV lead.

The primary safety endpoint for this study is freedom from left ventricular lead-related complications through 3 months.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CRT-D and LV Lead
n=178 Participants
CRT-D and LV lead (Quartet™ lead and Promote Q® device system): Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead
Patients Per Complete Case Analysis
Complete case analysis includes only the number of patients that were successfully implanted with the Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead.
Freedom From Left Ventricular Lead-Related Complications Through 3 Months
96 percentage probability
Interval 93.0 to
Upper bound was not calculated for this outcome measure with one sided hypothesis

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 Months

Population: Participants implanted with a Promote Q CRT-D device and Quartet LV lead.

The co-primary safety endpoint for this study is freedom from system-related complications through 3 months.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CRT-D and LV Lead
n=178 Participants
CRT-D and LV lead (Quartet™ lead and Promote Q® device system): Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead
Patients Per Complete Case Analysis
Complete case analysis includes only the number of patients that were successfully implanted with the Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead.
Freedom From System-related Complications Through 3 Months
92 percentage probability
Interval 88.0 to
Upper bound was not calculated for this outcome measure with one sided hypothesis

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 Months

The primary effectiveness endpoint for the Promote Q system was the responder rate to biventricular pacing at 3 months. A responder per protocol was defined as a patient with an LV pacing threshold of \<2.5 V at 0.5ms in the D1-M2 pacing configuration (Vector 1) AND at least one other non-standard programmable biventricular lead vector. Non-standard vectors included Vector 2 (D1-P4), Vector 4 (M2-P4), Vector 6 (M3-M2), Vector 7 (M3-P4), Vector 8 (M3-RV coil), Vector 9 (P4-M2) and Vector 10 (P4-RV coil).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
CRT-D and LV Lead
n=178 Participants
CRT-D and LV lead (Quartet™ lead and Promote Q® device system): Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead
Patients Per Complete Case Analysis
n=162 Participants
Complete case analysis includes only the number of patients that were successfully implanted with the Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead.
The Primary Effectiveness Endpoint for the Promote Q System Was the Responder Rate to Biventricular Pacing at 3 Months.
79.2 percentage of participants
Interval 72.5 to
Upper bound was not calculated for this outcome measure with one sided hypothesis
83.3 percentage of participants
Interval 76.7 to
Upper bound was not calculated for this outcome measure with one sided hypothesis

Adverse Events

CRT-D and LV Lead

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 76 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
CRT-D and LV Lead
n=178 participants at risk
CRT-D and LV Lead
Cardiac disorders
Complications
15.7%
28/178 • Number of events 36
Cardiac disorders
Observations
27.0%
48/178 • Number of events 59

Additional Information

Clay Cohorn: Director, Clinical Study Management

St. Jude Medical

Phone: 972 309 8087

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place