Trial Outcomes & Findings for Promote Q Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) and Quartet Left Ventricular Heart Lead Study (NCT NCT00990665)
NCT ID: NCT00990665
Last Updated: 2019-02-27
Results Overview
The primary safety endpoint for this study is freedom from left ventricular lead-related complications through 3 months.
COMPLETED
NA
178 participants
3 months
2019-02-27
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CRT-D and LV Lead
CRT-D and LV lead (Quartet™ lead and Promote Q® device system): Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
178
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
130
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
48
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
CRT-D and LV Lead
CRT-D and LV lead (Quartet™ lead and Promote Q® device system): Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Unsuccessful Implant
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
Heart Transplant
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
System Explant
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Promote Q Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) and Quartet Left Ventricular Heart Lead Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CRT-D and LV Lead
n=178 Participants
CRT-D and LV lead (Quartet™ lead and Promote Q® device system): Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
122 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
140 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
New York Heart Association Class
Class III
|
175 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
New York Heart Association Class
Class IV
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: Patients implanted with a Promote Q CRT-D device and Quartet LV lead.
The primary safety endpoint for this study is freedom from left ventricular lead-related complications through 3 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CRT-D and LV Lead
n=178 Participants
CRT-D and LV lead (Quartet™ lead and Promote Q® device system): Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead
|
Patients Per Complete Case Analysis
Complete case analysis includes only the number of patients that were successfully implanted with the Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Freedom From Left Ventricular Lead-Related Complications Through 3 Months
|
96 percentage probability
Interval 93.0 to
Upper bound was not calculated for this outcome measure with one sided hypothesis
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 MonthsPopulation: Participants implanted with a Promote Q CRT-D device and Quartet LV lead.
The co-primary safety endpoint for this study is freedom from system-related complications through 3 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CRT-D and LV Lead
n=178 Participants
CRT-D and LV lead (Quartet™ lead and Promote Q® device system): Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead
|
Patients Per Complete Case Analysis
Complete case analysis includes only the number of patients that were successfully implanted with the Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Freedom From System-related Complications Through 3 Months
|
92 percentage probability
Interval 88.0 to
Upper bound was not calculated for this outcome measure with one sided hypothesis
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 MonthsThe primary effectiveness endpoint for the Promote Q system was the responder rate to biventricular pacing at 3 months. A responder per protocol was defined as a patient with an LV pacing threshold of \<2.5 V at 0.5ms in the D1-M2 pacing configuration (Vector 1) AND at least one other non-standard programmable biventricular lead vector. Non-standard vectors included Vector 2 (D1-P4), Vector 4 (M2-P4), Vector 6 (M3-M2), Vector 7 (M3-P4), Vector 8 (M3-RV coil), Vector 9 (P4-M2) and Vector 10 (P4-RV coil).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CRT-D and LV Lead
n=178 Participants
CRT-D and LV lead (Quartet™ lead and Promote Q® device system): Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead
|
Patients Per Complete Case Analysis
n=162 Participants
Complete case analysis includes only the number of patients that were successfully implanted with the Promote Q CRT-D and Quartet LV lead.
|
|---|---|---|
|
The Primary Effectiveness Endpoint for the Promote Q System Was the Responder Rate to Biventricular Pacing at 3 Months.
|
79.2 percentage of participants
Interval 72.5 to
Upper bound was not calculated for this outcome measure with one sided hypothesis
|
83.3 percentage of participants
Interval 76.7 to
Upper bound was not calculated for this outcome measure with one sided hypothesis
|
Adverse Events
CRT-D and LV Lead
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CRT-D and LV Lead
n=178 participants at risk
CRT-D and LV Lead
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Complications
|
15.7%
28/178 • Number of events 36
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Observations
|
27.0%
48/178 • Number of events 59
|
Additional Information
Clay Cohorn: Director, Clinical Study Management
St. Jude Medical
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place