Improving Aspirin Use Among Adults at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease (CVD)
NCT ID: NCT00981032
Last Updated: 2011-02-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
884 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-10-31
2010-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Observational Aspirin Use and CVD in the Physicians' Health Study
NCT00005493
Aspirin Resistance in Coronary Artery Disease
NCT00753935
Mechanism Based Resistance to Aspirin
NCT00948987
Aspirin Withdrawal and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Moderate to High Cardiovascular Risk But Without Cardiovascular Disease
NCT03757156
Genotypic and Phenotypic Correlates of Resistance to Aspirin
NCT01361620
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We propose to compare the effectiveness of three models of care in a rigorous randomized controlled trial that will consist of a 3-arm, within-clinic design in which patients will be randomized to either the physician-initiated, the patient-initiated model, or to a control group in which usual care is delivered. In a patient-initiated model, patients are active participants in their own care and receive a pre-visit summary that contains an individualized risk assessment and patient education. In the physician-initiated model, patients receive the pre-visit summary and the physician uses a clinical decision support tool through the electronic health record that details the patient risk of CVD.
The specific aims of the proposed work are to compare the reliability and overall effectiveness of two different methods for motivating patients to take aspirin to prevent stroke and heart attacks as well as to develop a plan for translating the intervention into a process that is suitable for a paper-based clinic.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pre-visit Summary
Patients in this arm will receive a pre-visit summary prior to their appointment. The pre-visit summary details the patient's risk of heart attack or stroke and the benefits of daily prophylactic aspirin use.
Pre-visit Summary
The intervention is a pre-visit summary given to the patient prior to their appointment. The pre-visit summary details the patient's risk of heart attack or stroke and the benefits of daily prophylactic aspirin use.
Clinical Decision Sharing Tool
Patients in this arm will receive a pre-visit summary prior to their appointment. They will also view a clinical decision sharing tool in conjunction with the physician in the office. The pre-visit summary details the patient's risk of heart attack or stroke and the benefits of daily prophylactic aspirin use. The clinical decision sharing tool informs the physician of the patient's heart attack or stroke risk and determines if the patient would benefit from aspirin use.
Clinical Decision Sharing Tool
This intervention includes a pre-visit summary and a clinical decision sharing tool. Patients will receive a pre-visit summary prior to their appointment. They will also view a clinical decision sharing tool in conjunction with the physician in the office. The pre-visit summary details the patient's risk of heart attack or stroke and the benefits of daily prophylactic aspirin use. The clinical decision sharing tool informs the physician of the patient's heart attack or stroke risk and determines if the patient would benefit from aspirin use.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pre-visit Summary
The intervention is a pre-visit summary given to the patient prior to their appointment. The pre-visit summary details the patient's risk of heart attack or stroke and the benefits of daily prophylactic aspirin use.
Clinical Decision Sharing Tool
This intervention includes a pre-visit summary and a clinical decision sharing tool. Patients will receive a pre-visit summary prior to their appointment. They will also view a clinical decision sharing tool in conjunction with the physician in the office. The pre-visit summary details the patient's risk of heart attack or stroke and the benefits of daily prophylactic aspirin use. The clinical decision sharing tool informs the physician of the patient's heart attack or stroke risk and determines if the patient would benefit from aspirin use.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* are between the ages of 45-70 (male) or 50-70 (female), and
* have one of the following risk factors:
1. Smoke
2. Direct LDL \> 160 mg/dl
3. HDL \< 45 mg/dl (males) HDL \< 35 mg/dl (females)
4. Diabetes diagnosis
5. Hypertension diagnosis
6. CAD diagnosis
Exclusion Criteria
* Stomach Ulcer History
* Aspirin Allergy
* Anti-coagulation Therapy History
* Clotting Disorder Diagnosis
* Hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents such as Ibuprofen, Aleve, or Motrin
* Hemorrhagic Stroke History
* Current Aspirin use
* 1st Outpatient Visit
45 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
FED
Geisinger Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Geisinger Clinic
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nirav R Shah, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Geisinger Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Geisinger Clinic - Lewistown
Lewistown, Pennsylvania, United States
Geisinger Clinic - Moshannon Valley
Philipsburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Geisinger Clinic - Lake Scranton
Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
(Click here for more information about Geisinger Health System)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008-0264
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.