Neurodevelopmental Outcomes and Fluconazole Prophylaxis

NCT ID: NCT00975949

Last Updated: 2013-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

39 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the neurodevelopmental outcome and quality of life between the fluconazole-treated and the placebo-treated patients that were enrolled in a fluconazole prophylaxis study that occurred in the investigators' neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between 1998-2000.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Invasive fungal infections in preterm infants is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Mortality in infected infants \< 1000 grams is between 26-66% and neurodevelopmental impairment occurs in 57%.1-13 Between 1998-2000 we conducted a randomized placebo controlled trial of fluconazole prophylaxis in 100 infants \<1000 grams at birth(IRB-HSR #9389). Invasive fungal infections occurred in none of the fluconazole-treated patients compared to 20% of the placebo group. Following this study the efficacy has been confirmed in a multicenter randomized controlled trial and 7 retrospective studies. One major issue that has remained is whether the fluconazole-treated infants have better neurodevelopmental outcomes as well as if it is safe without an increase in neurodevelopmental impairment.

Neurodevelopmental outcomes can be assessed by testing and examinations or by parental and child questionnaires. In addition, quality of life is an important context of outcomes. Recent conceptualizations of quality of life recognize the multidimensional nature of quality of life, including psychological and social functioning, consistent with the World Health Organization's definition of health as "not only the absence of disease and infirmity, but the presence of physical, mental, and social well-being." The World Health Organization subsequently emphasized the growing consensus that quality of life is a subjective experience, defined as "individuals' perceptions of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live, and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns."

To address these issues, we aim to study and compare the neurodevelopmental outcome and quality of life between our fluconazole-treated and placebo-treated patients in our initial study

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fluconazole Group

These subjects received fluconazole in our NICU fluconazole prophylaxis study during 1998-2000

Survey

Intervention Type OTHER

Parents of subjects were interviewed and two surveys were obtained, the Child Health Questionnaire and the Vineland-II.

Placebo Group

These subjects received a placebo during our NICU fluconazole prophylaxis study during 1998-2000

Survey

Intervention Type OTHER

Parents of subjects were interviewed and two surveys were obtained, the Child Health Questionnaire and the Vineland-II.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Survey

Parents of subjects were interviewed and two surveys were obtained, the Child Health Questionnaire and the Vineland-II.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Parents or guardians and their infants who survived and were enrolled in our initial study of fluconazole prophylaxis for prevention of fungal colonization and infection in preterm infants \< 1000 grams
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

10 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Virginia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David A Kaufman

Prinicipal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Kaufman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Virginia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Virginia Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13697

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.