Trial Outcomes & Findings for SNaP Wound Care System Versus Traditional NPWT Device for Treatment of Chronic Wounds (NCT NCT00951080)

NCT ID: NCT00951080

Last Updated: 2022-08-01

Results Overview

The percent change in wound area as measured from Visitrak tracings (Value at 16 weeks minus value at baseline / value at baseline)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

132 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and 16 weeks

Results posted on

2022-08-01

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
SNaP Wound Care System
SNaP Wound Care System: Wound dressing applications using customized system. Dressing applications changes per manufacturer recommendation.
Traditional NPWT System
Traditional NPWT System: Standard wound dressing applications followed by negative pressure system application per manufacturer recommendations.
Overall Study
STARTED
64
68
Overall Study
COMPLETED
38
41
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
26
27

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
SNaP Wound Care System
SNaP Wound Care System: Wound dressing applications using customized system. Dressing applications changes per manufacturer recommendation.
Traditional NPWT System
Traditional NPWT System: Standard wound dressing applications followed by negative pressure system application per manufacturer recommendations.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
3
3
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
0
1
Overall Study
Physician Decision
4
1
Overall Study
Other
19
22

Baseline Characteristics

SNaP Wound Care System Versus Traditional NPWT Device for Treatment of Chronic Wounds

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
SNaP Wound Care System
n=64 Participants
SNaP Wound Care System: Wound dressing applications using customized system. Dressing applications changes per manufacturer recommendation.
Traditional NPWT System
n=68 Participants
Traditional NPWT System: Standard wound dressing applications followed by negative pressure system application per manufacturer recommendations.
Total
n=132 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
65.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 • n=5 Participants
65.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 • n=7 Participants
65.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity (White)
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
87 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
64 participants
n=5 Participants
68 participants
n=7 Participants
132 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 16 weeks

The percent change in wound area as measured from Visitrak tracings (Value at 16 weeks minus value at baseline / value at baseline)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
SNaP Wound Care System
n=59 Participants
SNaP Wound Care System: Wound dressing applications using customized system. Dressing applications changes per manufacturer recommendation.
Traditional NPWT System
n=56 Participants
Traditional NPWT System: Standard wound dressing applications followed by negative pressure system application per manufacturer recommendations.
Percent Change in Wound Area
-85.7 percentage of baseline wound area
Interval -100.0 to 392.3
-94 percentage of baseline wound area
Interval -100.0 to 500.0

Adverse Events

SNaP Wound Care System

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 14 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Traditional NPWT System

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 18 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
SNaP Wound Care System
n=64 participants at risk
SNaP Wound Care System: Wound dressing applications using customized system. Dressing applications changes per manufacturer recommendation.
Traditional NPWT System
n=68 participants at risk
Traditional NPWT System: Standard wound dressing applications followed by negative pressure system application per manufacturer recommendations.
Infections and infestations
Infection of study wound (Venous Leg Ulcer)
0.00%
0/64
1.5%
1/68
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis right foot (Venous Leg Ulcer)
0.00%
0/64
1.5%
1/68

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
SNaP Wound Care System
n=64 participants at risk
SNaP Wound Care System: Wound dressing applications using customized system. Dressing applications changes per manufacturer recommendation.
Traditional NPWT System
n=68 participants at risk
Traditional NPWT System: Standard wound dressing applications followed by negative pressure system application per manufacturer recommendations.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Maceration
15.6%
10/64
19.1%
13/68
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Allergic reaction to dressing
6.2%
4/64
7.4%
5/68
General disorders
Pain (wound)
1.6%
1/64
5.9%
4/68
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Blisters
4.7%
3/64
5.9%
4/68
Infections and infestations
Infection
3.1%
2/64
7.4%
5/68

Additional Information

VP, Global Clinical Development

KCI

Phone: 12102555595

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place