A Dose Range Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AZD9668 Administered Orally at Three Dose Levels to Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) on Treatment With Tiotropium

NCT ID: NCT00949975

Last Updated: 2012-08-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

838 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-31

Study Completion Date

2010-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective is to evaluate the dose-response relationship and efficacy of AZD9668 at 3 dose levels compared with placebo in symptomatic COPD patients by assessing effects on lung function and symptoms of COPD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Lung Respiratory disease Efficacy Safety and tolerability Placebo-controlled Pharmacokinetics COPD

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

AZD9668 active treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

AZD9668

Intervention Type DRUG

2 x 30 mg oral tablets twice daily (bid) for 12 weeks

2

AZD9668 active treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

AZD9668

Intervention Type DRUG

2 x 10 mg oral tablets twice daily (bid) for 12 weeks

3

AZD9668 active treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

AZD9668

Intervention Type DRUG

2 x 2.5 mg oral tablets twice daily (bid) for 12 weeks

4

AZD9668 placebo treatment

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

AZD9668 Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

2 x Matched placebo to oral tablet twice daily (bid) for 12 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AZD9668

2 x 30 mg oral tablets twice daily (bid) for 12 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

AZD9668

2 x 10 mg oral tablets twice daily (bid) for 12 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

AZD9668

2 x 2.5 mg oral tablets twice daily (bid) for 12 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

AZD9668 Placebo

2 x Matched placebo to oral tablet twice daily (bid) for 12 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of COPD with symptoms over 1 year
* Smokers or ex-smokers
* Males or post-menopausal females between 40 and 80 years old
* Able to use electronic devices

Exclusion Criteria

* Past history or current evidence of clinically significant heart disease
* Current diagnosis of asthma
* Patients who require long term oxygen therapy
* Treatment with antibiotics within 4 weeks of study visit 1b
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Claus Volgemeier, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Director der Klinik fur Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Pneumologie-Universitatsklinikum GieBen und Marburg, D-35043 Marburg, Germany

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Valparaiso, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Gaffney, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boerne, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Concord, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Glebe, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Carina Heights, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Daw Park, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Grimsby, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

La Malbaie, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Mirabel, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Saint-Léonard, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Fulda, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Seto, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Noda, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Touon, Ehime, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yukuhashi, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Nihommatsu, Fukushima, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Himeji, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kochi, Kochi, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Ukyo-ku, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Saiki, Oita Prefecture, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kishiwada, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kita-ku, Sakai, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Matsue, Shimane, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Chūō, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Nakano-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Tanabe, Wakayama, Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Bunkyō City, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Iloilo City, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Lipa City, Batangas, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Quezon City, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Chęciny, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Ostrów Wielkopolski, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Proszowice, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Tczew, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Zawadzkie, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Barnaul, Russia, Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Kazan', Russia, Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, Russia, Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Novosibirsk, Russia, Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, Russia, Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Yekaterinburg, Russia, Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Bardejov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Bojnice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Nové Mesto nad Váhom, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Nové Zámky, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Poprad, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Trnava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Zvolen, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Wŏnju, Gangwon-do, South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Uijeongbu-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Anyang, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Bucheon-si, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Keelung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Ivano-Frankivsk, Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Luhansk, Ukraine, Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Canada Germany Japan Philippines Poland Russia Slovakia South Korea Taiwan Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leidy NK, Murray LT, Monz BU, Nelsen L, Goldman M, Jones PW, Dansie EJ, Sethi S. Measuring respiratory symptoms of COPD: performance of the EXACT- Respiratory Symptoms Tool (E-RS) in three clinical trials. Respir Res. 2014 Oct 7;15(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12931-014-0124-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25287629 (View on PubMed)

Leidy NK, Murray LT, Jones P, Sethi S. Performance of the EXAcerbations of chronic pulmonary disease tool patient-reported outcome measure in three clinical trials of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Mar;11(3):316-25. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201309-305OC.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24432712 (View on PubMed)

Vogelmeier C, Aquino TO, O'Brien CD, Perrett J, Gunawardena KA. A randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study of AZD9668, an oral inhibitor of neutrophil elastase, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated with tiotropium. COPD. 2012 Apr;9(2):111-20. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2011.641803.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22458939 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D0520C00012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id