Comparison of Standard Neuronavigation With Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for the Neurosurgical Treatment of Malignant Brain Tumors

NCT ID: NCT00943007

Last Updated: 2015-04-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-02-28

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The treatment of a specific subtype of highly malignant brain tumor (called "glioblastoma" or "glioblastoma multiforme") consists of neurosurgical resection, followed by radiotherapy and mostly chemotherapy as well. Increased extent of tumor resection is associated with prolonged survival. The standard treatment uses conventional neuronavigation systems to increase extent of tumor resection. However, the quality of this form of neuronavigation decreases throughout surgery because of "brain shift". This is caused by edema, loss of cerebrospinal fluid and tumor resection. A new form of neuronavigation uses intraoperative MRI to compensate for brain shift, and to check for the presence of residual tumor that can be removed.

This study aims to compare the extent of glioblastoma resection between the standard treatment and intraoperative MRI.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glioblastoma Multiforme

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional Neuronavigation

Standard form of neuronavigation: based on preoperative MRI without intraoperative correction for brain shift

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Stealth Station

Intervention Type DEVICE

Neuronavigation based on preoperative MRI

Intraoperative MRI

Standard neuronavigation plus intraoperative MRI to correct for brain shift

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PoleStar N20

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intraoperative MRI guided surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stealth Station

Neuronavigation based on preoperative MRI

Intervention Type DEVICE

PoleStar N20

Intraoperative MRI guided surgery

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

cNN iMRI

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* supratentorial brain tumor, on contrast enhanced dMRI suspected to be GBM
* indication for gross total resection (GTR) of the tumor
* age ≥18 years
* WHO Performance Scale ≤ 2
* ASA class ≤ 3
* adequate knowledge of the Dutch or French language
* informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* recurrent brain tumor
* multiple brain tumor localizations
* earlier skull radiotherapy
* earlier chemotherapy for GBM
* Chronic Kidney Disease or other renal function disorder
* known MR-contrast allergy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Henk van Santbrink, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Didier Martin, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege

Koo van Overbeeke, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Maastricht University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Maastricht University Medical Center

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEC 08-2-055

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy
NCT06740955 RECRUITING NA
68Ga-P16-093 PET/CT Imaging in Glioma Patients
NCT05569434 UNKNOWN PHASE1/PHASE2