A Collaborative Model to Improve Blood Pressure (BP) Control and Minimize Racial Disparities

NCT ID: NCT00935077

Last Updated: 2014-07-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1441 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to determine the degree to which pharmacist-physician collaborative management (PPCM) of hypertension can be adopted and implemented in clinics with geographic and racial diversity and whether patients in clinics which implement PPCM achieve greater blood pressure control than patients in clinics which do not implement PPCM.

Primary Hypothesis: BP control at 9 months will be significantly greater in patients from clinics randomized to the two PPCM BP intervention groups compared to the control group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Blood pressure (BP) is controlled in only 34% of patients with high BP, leading to unnecessary strokes, myocardial infarctions and other cardiovascular events. BP control can be improved with physician/ pharmacist collaborative management (PPCM). Our long-range goal is to achieve excellent BP control rates using PPCM that can be implemented in private practices in diverse communities. The objective of this application is to conduct a large multi-center clinical trial in clinics with geographic, racial and ethnic diversity to determine the extent to which the model is implemented. This practice-based research network (PBRN) is unique with a large minority population and great diversity in operation and community size. This prospective, cluster-randomized trial uses 27 clinics, matched and randomized to the active intervention (2 groups) or a control group in 648 patients. Following 9 months of the intervention, one intervention group will continue the intervention following 9 months while the other will discontinue it. We will also randomize 18 patients per clinic into a passive observation group (n=486) to determine if PPCM is implemented more broadly in the clinic. Patients in all three groups will be followed for 24 months. We will accomplish our objectives and test our central hypothesis by pursing the following aims:

Aim 1: To determine if patients in clinics randomized to PPCM can achieve better BP control at 9 months compared to patients in clinics randomized to the control group.

Primary Hypothesis: BP control at 9 months will be significantly greater in patients from clinics randomized to the two PPCM BP intervention groups compared to the control group.

Aim 2: To determine if patients in clinics randomized to continuation of PPCM achieve better long-term BP control compared to patients in clinics randomized to discontinuation of PPCM after 9 months and to patients in control clinics.

Our innovative approach addresses critical organizational barriers and challenges existing approaches to achieving better BP control. This study is novel because it will: 1) be the largest study to test this model, 2) use a cluster randomized design to include many more clinics than previously used, 3) use a diverse group of clinics with broad geographic distribution, 4) include large numbers of patients from minority groups to assess potential health disparities, 5) evaluate whether the effect can be sustained long-term, 6) include standardized BP measurements rather than error-prone office BPs, 7) minimize selection bias, and 8) evaluate a "passive observation group" to evaluate dissemination of PPCM throughout the practice. We expect that our study will find a 6-8 mm Hg difference in systolic BP which would lead to 20-30% fewer coronary deaths and 25-40% fewer stroke deaths if applied across broadly across similar settings.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension Asthma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

24 Month PPCM BP

A 24 month long physician/pharmacist collaborative intervention is implemented to manage hypertension

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

24 Month PPCM BP

Intervention Type OTHER

Pharmacists collaborate with physicians for 24 months to manage hypertension.

9 Month PPCM BP

A 9 month long physician/pharmacist collaborative intervention is implemented to manage hypertension

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

9 Month PPCM BP

Intervention Type OTHER

Pharmacists collaborate with pharmacists for 9 months to manage hypertension

PPCM Asthma

A 9 month long physician/pharmacist collaborative intervention is implemented to manage asthma

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

PPCM Asthma

Intervention Type OTHER

Pharmacists collaborate with physicians to manage asthma

BP Control Arm

No PPCM intervention

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PPCM Asthma

Pharmacists collaborate with physicians to manage asthma

Intervention Type OTHER

24 Month PPCM BP

Pharmacists collaborate with physicians for 24 months to manage hypertension.

Intervention Type OTHER

9 Month PPCM BP

Pharmacists collaborate with pharmacists for 9 months to manage hypertension

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. English or Spanish speaking males or females, over 18 years of age with a diagnosis of hypertension,
2. have uncontrolled BP defined as \> 140 mm Hg SBP or \> 90 mm Hg DBP for patients with uncomplicated hypertension; or \> 130 mm Hg SBP or \> 80 mm Hg DBP for patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease, and
3. receive care from one of the participating clinics.

Exclusion Criteria

1. current signs of hypertensive emergency (acute angina, stroke, or renal failure;
2. severe HTN (systolic BP \>200 or diastolic BP \> 114 mm Hg);
3. history of MI, stroke, or unstable angina in the prior 6 months;
4. systolic dysfunction with a LV ejection fraction \< 35% documented by echocardiography, nuclear medicine study, or ventriculography;
5. renal insufficiency, defined by a glomerular filtration rate less than 20 ml/min or previously documented proteinuria \> 1 gram per day;
6. significant hepatic disease, including prior diagnoses of cirrhosis, Hepatitis B or C infection, or laboratory abnormalities (serum ALT or AST \> 2 times control or total bilirubin \> 1.5 mg/dl) in the prior 6 months;
7. pregnancy;
8. diagnoses of pulmonary hypertension or sleep apnea (unless treated by continuous positive pressure ventilation);
9. poor prognosis with a life expectancy estimated less than 2 years;
10. residence in a nursing home or diagnosis of dementia; and
11. inability to give informed consent or impaired cognitive function (defined as \> 3 errors on the 10-item Pfeiffer Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, administered during study intake).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Iowa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Barry L. Carter, PharmD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Iowa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

St. Francis Hospital Medical Center

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of South Florida

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Idaho State University

Pocatello, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Midwestern University

Downers Grove, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Genesis Health System

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Broadlawns Medical Center

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

The University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Siouxland Medical Education Foundation

Sioux City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Northeast Iowa Medical Education Foundation

Waterloo, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Cambridge Health Alliance

Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

SUNY-University of Buffalo

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Temple University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Spartanburg Regional Health Service District

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Texas Tech University Health Science Center

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Seton Healthcare

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas at El Paso

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Memorial Hermann Hospital System

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Wheaton Franciscan Medical Group

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Anderegg MD, Gums TH, Uribe L, MacLaughlin EJ, Hoehns J, Bazaldua OV, Ives TJ, Hahn DL, Coffey CS, Carter BL. Pharmacist Intervention for Blood Pressure Control in Patients with Diabetes and/or Chronic Kidney Disease. Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Mar;38(3):309-318. doi: 10.1002/phar.2083. Epub 2018 Feb 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29331037 (View on PubMed)

Anderegg MD, Gums TH, Uribe L, Coffey CS, James PA, Carter BL. Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Management: Narrowing the Socioeconomic Blood Pressure Gap. Hypertension. 2016 Nov;68(5):1314-1320. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08043. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27600181 (View on PubMed)

Carter BL. Primary Care Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Care Model: Strategies for Implementation. Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Apr;36(4):363-73. doi: 10.1002/phar.1732. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26931738 (View on PubMed)

Isetts BJ, Buffington DE, Carter BL, Smith M, Polgreen LA, James PA. Evaluation of Pharmacists' Work in a Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Model for the Management of Hypertension. Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Apr;36(4):374-84. doi: 10.1002/phar.1727. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26893135 (View on PubMed)

Carter BL, Coffey CS, Ardery G, Uribe L, Ecklund D, James P, Egan B, Vander Weg M, Chrischilles E, Vaughn T. Cluster-randomized trial of a physician/pharmacist collaborative model to improve blood pressure control. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 May;8(3):235-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001283. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25805647 (View on PubMed)

Carter BL, Coffey CS, Uribe L, James PA, Egan BM, Ardery G, Chrischilles EA, Ecklund D, Vander Weg M, Vaughn T; Collaboration Among Pharmacists and Physicians to Improve Outcomes Now (CAPTION) trial investigators. Similar blood pressure values across racial and economic groups: baseline data from a group randomized clinical trial. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Jun;15(6):404-12. doi: 10.1111/jch.12091. Epub 2013 Apr 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23730989 (View on PubMed)

Demik DE, Vander Weg MW, Lundt ES, Coffey CS, Ardery G, Carter BL. Using theory to predict implementation of a physician-pharmacist collaborative intervention within a practice-based research network. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Nov-Dec;9(6):719-30. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Mar 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23506651 (View on PubMed)

Carter BL, Clarke W, Ardery G, Weber CA, James PA, Vander Weg M, Chrischilles EA, Vaughn T, Egan BM; Collaboration Among Pharmacists Physicians To Improve Outcomes Now (CAPTION) Trial Investigators. A cluster-randomized effectiveness trial of a physician-pharmacist collaborative model to improve blood pressure control. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jul;3(4):418-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.908038.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20647575 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01HL091841

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.