Axillary Lymph Node Preservation Surgery in Reducing Lymphedema in Patients With Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00932035

Last Updated: 2017-06-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

39 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-06-30

Study Completion Date

2014-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This pilot phase I and randomized phase II trial studies the best way to perform axillary lymph node preservation surgery and to see how well it works in preventing lymphedema in patients with breast cancer. Lymph node mapping may help in planning surgery to remove breast cancer and affected lymph nodes. It is not yet known whether reverse mapping guided axillary lymph node dissection is more effective than standard axillary lymph node dissection in preventing lymphedema.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To produce a map of the lymphatic drainage of the upper extremity as it relates to breast drainage, to determine the proportion of women undergoing axillary lymphadenectomy at risk for lymphedema. II. To determine if blue lymphatics contain lymph node metastases. III. To evaluate the incidence of lymphedema and associated other surgical related quality of life in those undergoing this procedure as compared to the current standard of care.

OUTLINE: This is a phase I study followed by a randomized phase II study.

PILOT PORTION: Patients receive isosulfan blue dye subcutaneously (SC) and then undergo reverse mapping-guided axillary lymph node dissection.

RANDOMIZED PORTION: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients receive isosulfan blue dye subcutaneously (SC) and then undergo reverse mapping-guided axillary lymph node dissection. ARM II: Patients undergo standard axillary lymph node dissection and then receive isosulfan blue dye SC.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm I (reverse mapping guided axillary lymph node dissection)

Patients receive isosulfan blue dye SC and then undergo reverse mapping-guided axillary lymph node dissection.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

axillary lymph node dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo reverse mapping-guided axillary lymph node dissection

isosulfan blue based lymphatic mapping

Intervention Type DRUG

quality-of-life assessment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ancillary studies

Questionnaire administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Arm II (control)

Patients undergo standard axillary lymph node dissection and then receive isosulfan blue dye SC.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

isosulfan blue based lymphatic mapping

Intervention Type DRUG

axillary lymph node dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Undergo standard axillary lymph node dissection

quality-of-life assessment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ancillary studies

Questionnaire administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

axillary lymph node dissection

Undergo reverse mapping-guided axillary lymph node dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

isosulfan blue based lymphatic mapping

Intervention Type DRUG

axillary lymph node dissection

Undergo standard axillary lymph node dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

quality-of-life assessment

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Questionnaire administration

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

isosulfan blue dye Lymphazurin blue dye isosulfan blue dye Lymphazurin blue dye isosulfan blue dye Lymphazurin blue dye

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Patients diagnosed with breast cancer with a planned axillary lymph node dissection planned for breast cancer

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior lymphedema in either arm
* Prior history of axillary surgery (except for sentinel node biopsies)
* Prior history of chest/axillary radiation
* Need for bilateral axillary node dissection surgery
* Prior neurologic deficits (either motor or sensory) in ipsilateral arm
* Known allergy to vital blue dyes
* No prior diagnosis of inflammatory breast cancer
* Cannot be pregnant or planning to continue breast-feeding immediately after surgery
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

City of Hope Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven Chen, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

City of Hope Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

City of Hope Medical Center

Duarte, California, United States

Site Status

University of California, Davis Medical Center

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11130

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.